为了方便广大考生更好的复习,综合整理了备考资料:GMAT优秀作文精选,以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。
69. The following appeared in a memorandum from the president of a company that makes shampoo.
A widely publicized study claims that HR2, a chemical compound in our shampoo, can contribute to hair loss after prolonged use. This study, however, involved only 500 subjects. Furthermore, we have received no complaints from our customers during the past year, and some of our competitors actually use more HR2 per bottle of shampoo than we do. Therefore, we do not need to consider replacing the HR2 in our shampoo with a more expensive alternative.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
The president of the company that produces Glabrous Shampoo argues against removing the ingredient HR2 from the shampoo even though a scientific study claims that prolonged use of HR2 can contribute to hair loss. Three reasons are cited as the basis for this decision. First, it is argued that since the scientific study involved only 500 subjects, it can be disregarded. Second, none of Glabrous customers have complained of problems during the past year. And, finally, Glabrous competitors use more HR2 per bottle than Glabrous. The presidents decision is problematic in several respects.
To begin with, the fact that the scientific study on HR2 involved only 500 subjects is insufficient grounds to dismiss the results of that study. If the subjects for the study were randomly chosen and represent a diverse cross section of the population of shampoo users, the results will be reliable regardless of the number of participants.
Next, the scientific study determined that prolonged use could contribute to hair loss. While prolonged use was not defined in the memorandum, the fact that none of Glabrous customers have complained of problems during the past year is not a reliable reason to believe that problems will not arise in the future.
Finally, the fact that Glabrous competitors use more HR2 in their products than Glabrous uses is irrelevant to the question of whether Glabrous should remove HR2 from its product. Moreover, rather than providing a reason for not removing the compound, this fact serves better as a reason for doing so. By removing HR2 from its product Glabrous could gain an edge over its competitors.
In conclusion, the reasoning in this argument is not convincing. To strengthen the argument the author would have to show that the study was biased or was based on too small a sample to yield reliable results.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
2017届高考英语一轮复习知识点专练:数词与主谓一致
体坛英语资讯:Neymar: Brazil has recovered winning DNA
国际英语资讯:Chinese vice premier urges boosting supply-side structural reform
体坛英语资讯:14th Cameroon International Cycling Tour concludes in Yaounde
国内英语资讯: 2 dead, 8 missing after boats sink in east China
2017届高考英语一轮全册复习学案:Unit15《Learning》(北师大版)
娱乐英语资讯:Legendary musician Chuck Berry dies at 90
2017届高考英语一轮复习知识点专练:定语从句
2017届高考英语一轮复习知识点专练:代词
国内英语资讯: More irregularities found in environment inspections in China
2017届高考英语一轮复习知识点专练:介词及介词短语
2017届高考英语一轮全册复习学案:Unit19《Language》(北师大版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习语法专练:4 定语从句(牛津译林版含解析)
2017届高考英语一轮全册复习学案:Unit21《Human Biology》(北师大版)
体坛英语资讯:Monaco keep high-flying profile in Ligue 1 title contest
2017届高考英语一轮全册复习学案:Unit14《Careers》(北师大版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习知识点专练:动词与动词短语
2017届高考英语一轮全册复习学案:Unit18《Beauty》(北师大版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习知识点专练:听力模拟题组三
体坛英语资讯:Bayern, Schalke win in German Bundesliga
2017届高考英语一轮全册复习学案:Unit20《New Frontiers》(北师大版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习知识点专练:名词性从句
2017届高考英语一轮全册复习学案:Unit16《Stories》(北师大版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习知识点专练:动词的时态与语态
2017届高考英语一轮复习语法专练:10 特殊句式(牛津译林版含解析)
2017届高考英语一轮复习语法专练:7 形容词和副词(牛津译林版含解析)
2017届高考英语一轮复习知识点专练:听力模拟题组二
2017届高考英语一轮复习语法专练:3 并列句和状语从句(牛津译林版含解析)
国内英语资讯: Beijing issues smog alert
2017届高考英语一轮复习语法专练:6 名词、冠词和代词(牛津译林版含解析)
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |