为了方便广大考生更好的复习,综合整理了备考资料:GMAT优秀作文精选,以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。
69. The following appeared in a memorandum from the president of a company that makes shampoo.
A widely publicized study claims that HR2, a chemical compound in our shampoo, can contribute to hair loss after prolonged use. This study, however, involved only 500 subjects. Furthermore, we have received no complaints from our customers during the past year, and some of our competitors actually use more HR2 per bottle of shampoo than we do. Therefore, we do not need to consider replacing the HR2 in our shampoo with a more expensive alternative.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
The president of the company that produces Glabrous Shampoo argues against removing the ingredient HR2 from the shampoo even though a scientific study claims that prolonged use of HR2 can contribute to hair loss. Three reasons are cited as the basis for this decision. First, it is argued that since the scientific study involved only 500 subjects, it can be disregarded. Second, none of Glabrous customers have complained of problems during the past year. And, finally, Glabrous competitors use more HR2 per bottle than Glabrous. The presidents decision is problematic in several respects.
To begin with, the fact that the scientific study on HR2 involved only 500 subjects is insufficient grounds to dismiss the results of that study. If the subjects for the study were randomly chosen and represent a diverse cross section of the population of shampoo users, the results will be reliable regardless of the number of participants.
Next, the scientific study determined that prolonged use could contribute to hair loss. While prolonged use was not defined in the memorandum, the fact that none of Glabrous customers have complained of problems during the past year is not a reliable reason to believe that problems will not arise in the future.
Finally, the fact that Glabrous competitors use more HR2 in their products than Glabrous uses is irrelevant to the question of whether Glabrous should remove HR2 from its product. Moreover, rather than providing a reason for not removing the compound, this fact serves better as a reason for doing so. By removing HR2 from its product Glabrous could gain an edge over its competitors.
In conclusion, the reasoning in this argument is not convincing. To strengthen the argument the author would have to show that the study was biased or was based on too small a sample to yield reliable results.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
北京幼升小证件材料审核严格 家长没吃透政策
上海总结“零起点” 35所学校亮招数
幼升小:入学、户籍、孩子、房子!
北京大兴区开办两所全日制公办小学
北京教改:学校间构建深度联盟致择校热降温
“幼升小”暑假必须学拼音? 专家:拔苗助长没有必要
怎样制作一个暑假学习计划
家长必读:科学暑假计划分享
黄磊写给女儿多多:写给未来的你
“零起点教学”再调查:零起点教学,家长怎么看?
升学季衔接班 家长一掷数万元
义务教育阶段体育课时普涨 小学初中增加体育课
专家指导:亲子阅读三步曲集锦
家长必知:如何营造家庭英语环境
适龄儿童入学扎堆,教育资源如何分配?
家长和孩子共同做到“无缝衔接”
学以致用:怎样更好的和外国人交谈?
幼升小毕业典礼两6岁男孩拥抱大哭
北京城南迎来教育“大咖” 北京四中新校区落子房山
上海总结“零起点” 35所学校亮招数
上不上培训班 孩子无力否决 大人也很纠结
父母需知:给孩子讲故事有益成长
孩子暑期要过好,家长先备课
零起点教学有助于遏制教育“抢跑”
北京史家小学开设星期六课程
专家解读:非京籍上学难真是因为学生太多吗?
幼儿园杜绝小学化倾向
教育6问,上学到底有多难?
幼升小孩子习惯培养:预习教材不如叫他收拾书包
暑期统计:孩子意外伤害增多
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |