为了方便广大考生更好的复习,综合整理了备考资料:GMAT优秀作文精选,以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。
The recommendation endorsed in this argument is that residents of San Perdito vote current mayor Montoya out of office, and re-elect former mayor Varro. The reasons cited are that during Montoyas four years in office the population has decreased while unemployment has increased, whereas during Varros term unemployment declined while the population grew. This argument involves the sort of gross oversimplification and emotional appeal typical of political rhetoric; for this reason it is unconvincing.
First of all, the author assumes that the Montoya administration caused the unemployment in San Perdito as well as its population loss. The line of reasoning is that because Montoya was elected before the rise in unemployment and the decline in population, the former event caused the latter. But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps a statewide or nationwide recession is the cause of these events. Or perhaps the current economic downturn is part of a larger picture of economic cycles and trends, and has nothing to do with who happens to be mayor. Yet another possibility is that Varro enjoyed a period of economic stability and Varros own administration set the stage for the unemployment and the decline in population the city is now experiencing under Montoya.
Secondly, job availability and the economic health of ones community are issues that affect people emotionally. The argument at hand might have been intentionally oversimplified for the specific purpose of angering citizens of San Perdito, and thereby turning them against the incumbent mayor. Arguments that bypass relevant, complex reasoning in favor of stirring up emotions do nothing to establish their conclusions; they are also unfair to the parties involved.
In conclusion, I would not cast my vote for Varro on the basis of this weak argument. The author must provide support for the assumption that Mayor Montoya has caused San Perditos poor economy. Moreover, such support would have to involve examining and eliminating other possible causal factors. Only with more convincing evidence could this argument become more than just an emotional appeal.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
中考英语重要短语的用法及区别:among between
2016年中考英语语法知识考点总结:时态二
2016年中考英语词组辨析:what’s …like?/ How’s …?
中考英语重要短语的用法及区别:borrow lend
中考英语重要短语的用法及区别:arrive reach get to
中考英语重要短语的用法及区别:across cross through
中考英语重要短语的用法及区别:finally at last in the end
2016年中考英语词组辨析:like / as
2016年中考英语词组辨析:meet / meet with
2016年中考英语词组辨析:like/ love/ be fond of
2016年中考英语词组辨析:socks/ stockings
2016年中考英语语法知识考点总结:副词
中考英语重要短语的用法及区别:not … until until
中考英语重要短语的用法及区别:must have to
中考英语重要短语的用法及区别:as when while
2016年中考英语词组辨析:mist/ fog
2016年中考英语词组辨析:neither/ none
中考英语重要短语的用法及区别:how long how often
2016年中考英语语法知识考点总结:不定式
中考英语重要短语的用法及区别:alone lonely
2016年中考英语语法知识考点总结:动词
中考英语重要短语的用法及区别:also either too as well
中考英语重要短语的用法及区别:too much too many
2016年中考英语语法知识考点总结:形容词
2016年中考英语词组辨析:much too/ too much
2016年中考英语词组辨析:little/ small
2016年中考英语词组辨析:look/ look for/ find/ find out / look up
2016年中考英语词组辨析:past
2016年中考英语词组辨析:no longer/ not…any longer/no more
中考英语重要短语的用法及区别:few little
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |