留学小编为大家搜集总结了新GRE写作中的优秀范文,供大家参考,希望对考生有所帮助。
题目: Competition is ultimately more beneficial than detrimental to society.
归根结底,竞争对于社会是利多弊少。
正文:
Darwin suggested that the process of evolution is one based on competition. This deadly competition weeds out the weak and only the fittest of the species survives. Humans, being the product of millions of years of evolution, are by nature, competitive beings. Yet, humans are also social beings. Like the bees in the hive, we are not very successful living completely on our own. We need to cooperate with other individuals for our survival. Thus, a conflict ensues, between our innate competitiveness, and our need to cooperate. There are pros and cons associated with both. However, it is my belief that overall, competition, is more detrimental than beneficial to human society.
First, let us try to identify why there is competition in the first place. In an environment abundant with resources, where supply outstrips demand, there is very little need for the inhabitants to fight with each other over them. This is not the case on planet earth. Resources are limited, and there is constant jostling to get to the front of the queue to get acquire them. For example, thousands of prospective students apply to gain entrance to top universities around the world, but there are only a handful of places in those universities. Thus, there is competition to get into to these hallowed institutions of higher learning.From a utilitarian perspective, competition is a good thing. In evolution it is responsible for the elimination of weak genes. In the business environment, it gets rid of the weaker players. In politics, it weeds out unpopular candidates. In academia, it gets rid of weak students.
Furthermore, competition leads to self improvement. Businesses will strive to offer better products and services at lesser prices. The consumer reaps rich rewards from this competitive spirit. Politicians strive to do the utmost for the people, so they would get reelected. Students excel in there studies, trying to outdo each other.
Thus, ostensibly, competition is responsible for the betterment of the society as a whole. However, this is just the superficial view. Underneath the surface, competition, in every aspect, is slowly eating away at the very fabric of the society.
While it is true to say that competition in corporate world has brought great benefits to the consumer, the society as Missed A herewhole is playing a great price for it. Most businesses are exploiting cheap labour in the third world to maximise their profits. There are thousands of sweatshops run by well known western corporations in countries like Indonesia, Bangladesh and China. People are forced to work in squalid conditions, often 16 hours a day. They are lucky to receive a dollar a day for there labours. The moment a government in any of these countries try to improve the working conditions of the employees, these multinational giants flee the country, often leaving whole communities facing financial ruin. The corporations are aware that there are plenty of other labour markets that could be exploited with gay abandon.
That is just the human cost. What about the environmental costs? Competition has forced many corporations to stream line their operations. Environmental standards are normally the first victims of this stream line process. A significant amount of environmental pollution and land degradation has been blamed on industry, yet the factories keep producing more and more. Thousands of items go unsold each year due to competition. Only a fraction of this merchandise is recycled. The rest goes to the already overflowing landfills.
In politics, the detrimental effects of competition are blatant. Politicians often resort to popular yet socially damaging policies to gain votes. These measures include imprudent spending to rabble rousing. The current volatility in Israel and Palestine, the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka, and the famine in Zimbabwe are all, at least partially, problems created by politicians to get elected.
It has been said that education is one sphere where competition has always had a beneficial influence. Even this claim is dubious. Due to competition students are less likely to exchange ideas with one another, thus enriching the student population as whole. Furthermore, competition drives students to study well to pass exams, but not to gain wisdom. Students spend many hours preparing for standardised tests; tests which many believe are inherently flawed. Thus, it is often not the most intellectual student who succeeds, but the most competitive.
Competition is an inborn human trait. It has some positive qualities, but overall, it does far more harm than help to the society. As intelligent beings, humans can transcend their evolutionary weaknesses. Thus, humans should rely less competition and more cooperation for the sake of the society.
以上是新GRE写作中的优秀范文,希望考生能认真阅读,把握其写作特点以及写作思路,以便取得高分。
时事资讯:国庆60周年庆典将采取人工消雨
时事资讯:09年奥巴马独立纪念日献词
时事资讯:世卫建议先给医护人员接种甲流疫苗
时事资讯:G8领导人穿上明星大衣 参加峰会不惧风暴
时事资讯:阿里巴巴在美启动广告宣传
时事资讯:花旗将与联邦存款保险签署秘密协议
时事资讯:摩根大通:中美股市关联度增加
时事资讯:试验性爱滋病疫苗取得进展
时事资讯:台风凯萨娜袭击越南 至少23人死亡
时事资讯:意总理女儿公开指责老爸与女模曝绯闻
时事资讯:六成美国人支持二战时向日本投原子弹
时事资讯:奥巴马获赠巴西队球衣 面露尴尬
时事资讯:高盛交易业务秘密会议受调查
时事资讯:中国网民人数达到3.38亿
时事资讯:英首相夫人写博客 爆"G8夫人峰会"内幕
时事资讯:美国经济已对刺激计划上瘾
时事资讯:白宫委任特别检察官调查中情局虐囚
时事资讯:中国率先购买500亿美元IMF债券
时事资讯:奥巴马:美中将"塑造21世纪"
时事资讯:美国养育孩子成本高昂
时事资讯:社交网站好友申请爆棚 盖茨无奈退出
时事资讯:美国清洁能源立法无损产油国影响力
时事资讯:"奥巴马"进入俚语词典 意思为"酷"
时事资讯:作别Vista,携手Windows 7
时事资讯:看涨派不再看好美股前景
时事资讯:韩国指责朝鲜发动网络攻击
时事资讯:美俄就削减核武器达成共识
时事资讯:意总理"有染"应召女郎获盛邀出席巴黎派对
时事资讯:奥巴马选大使唯"钱"是举?
时事资讯:吉利在沃尔沃竞购赛中领先
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |