Higher education can be funded in several ways including the following three: 1. All costs are paid by the government. 2. All costs are paid by the student. 3. All costs are paid by the student using loans from the government that must be repaid after graduation. Discuss the benefits of each option. Which is the best one?
The issue that who should support students to carry on tertiary education has been constantly discussed and the range have already been restricted within three stakeholders: the government, the student or the student who borrows money from the government and return it after finishing education.
In terms of the first proposal, it is crystal-clear that the families financial burden will, to a large extent, decrease. As a result of this, a substantial number of students from financially inferior families tend to have the access to university education, which will surely enlarge the number of people receiving higher education, therefore contributing to development of the whole nation.
The student is likely to be more independent when the third approach is chosen. If students pay for their education themselves, they will probably have several years off and make a living. Not only could this help to gain social experiences, which will help to determine their major in university they are most interested in, but they will also be more of appreciating their own efforts for accumulating such a massive amount of money for education. This will probably stimulate the student to study hard and realize value of the money they earn.
With regard to the third choice, the prominent upside may lie with the students strong motivation to learn. In comparison with their counterparts, they shoulder more financial pressure and this would help them fully concentrate on their study so as to be more competitive for a job position. In this regard, there is a higher possibility for them to have a more promising career prospect.
Taking all three ways into consideration, I personally would prefer students to use the loan from government and repay it after graduation. For one thing, there would be additional financial stress for the government if only the government take the responsibility. For another, if all costs are paid by the student, s/he needs to take time off for years and there might be dangers for them never coming back to school.
纽约发型师行善 免费为穷人理发
麦当劳正失去对年轻人的吸引力
研究:婚礼越盛大 婚姻越幸福
福布斯排行榜:伦敦成为全球最具影响力城市
逗比小萝莉:不想让弟弟长大哭晕
17种讨人厌微博朋友圈 你中了几箭
2017年艾美奖《绝命毒师》成最大赢家
MH370残骸位置锁定印度洋58处地点
朋友借钱忘了还?3招帮你巧妙化解
埃博拉疫情防控:“肥皂桶挑战”
科学家发现绝佳购物音乐
职场潜规则 工作中你该如何道歉
德艺术家沙滩埋30金条 英国民众掀起寻金热
8条办公室环境里的健康贴士
天才or吃货?宝宝出生三天会抓奶瓶
美国9岁女童练枪误杀教练
招聘人员不会告诉你的十件事
剑桥大学禁养狗 院长指狗为猫
你不是真正的快乐:向前七步,找回本真
小米充电宝因质量问题受央视批评
女大学生现身说法三种危险情况如何自我防范
加州出奇招吸引赴美旅游的中国游客
世界最小土豪:9岁萌娃开饼干公司
妹妹患癌 姐姐替她生下宝宝
英式英语被美语攻占 Awesome的胜利
美国最新研究 走神能提高学习效率
《老友记》缘何已成明日黄花?
世卫组织建议对电子烟双重监管
火星一号移民计划 探险者的单程票
颠覆三观:最新调查表明早餐无用
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |