Topic: Should government invest poor population or hi-tech research.
Government investment has been put on more and more emphasis since peoples gradual awareness of its importance. The discussion of whether the government should investigate in Hi-Tech products or on poor people become fierce among different people. In my opinion, this is a dilemma which cannot be easily decided. However, the poor people should be concerned first.
People is the most fundamental aspect to form the society, thus they deserve more emphasis. It was our ancestors who first lit a fire with wood and bring light and culture to this world. And it is due to this, society was gradually formed and developed as we can see today. We can not ignore the significant role that people play in the long history of this world, therefore, as the central machine of country, government is responsible for every person in the society, and it should concern those who are poor and give them necessary help.
In addition, poverty will make the society unstable. Because of poverty, many people tend to steal or rub with the purpose of making a living, which highly increase the crime rate. Being desperate, some of them become more assailable, with their brain full of resentment and envy. As a result, they find killing an innocent person or lit a fire on others house is a good way of releasing their anger, and thats what we often see in the news. If our government dont investigate on them, we can not imagine what our society will be like.
Moreover, using a lot of money on Hi-Tech in a country which still has a large poor population is a waste of money. To produce a large number of Hi-Tech products will certainly lead to the result of detaining in stores because people have neither money nor emotion to enjoy the luxuries. When poor people are making every effort to make their ends meet, the government have no reason not to give a hand in them but put money on wasteful research or explore on Hi-Tech products.
To sum up, investigating on poor people benefit overweigh using money on Hi-Tech products. It is better to make poor people rich first, and then enjoy the pleasure that Hi-Tech bring to us.
了解“中美战略经济对话”
“恶搞视频”舌尖泡面版你看过了吗?
美国队凭借“净胜球数”出线
“点球大战”决胜负
“中国戏曲”繁荣只是“昙花一现”
埃及倡议巴以“停火”
北京有望2017年通“七环”
京沪穗汉将试点“反按揭”
足球场上的“假摔”及其它欺诈行为
世界杯上的“反歧视日”
新规定:公务出行不得购买“全价机票”
越南“冲撞”中方船只
意英回家 哥希“出线”
中国银行否认为移民“洗钱”
美葡战平 一起学学“平局”的英文说法
国产埃博拉“检测试剂”获批文
“倒卖进京户口指标”团伙落网
京津冀将实现“一卡通”通行
李克强英国智库演讲:中国没有“扩张基因”
“耽美派”文学受中国宅女追捧
梅西助攻天使“绝杀”瑞士
科普:“比赛球衣”也分主客场
金砖国家将成立“新发展银行”
新版汉语词典收“土豪”弃“屌丝”
教育部出台教师收受礼品礼金“六项禁令”
“射手榜”三足鼎立
世界杯半决赛史上最大“比分失利”
“省会城市”成大学毕业生就业首选
北京或扩大“无烟缓冲区”
北京人“健康期望寿命”为58.17岁
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |