How to evaluate students? When it comes tothis question, I think most people will have a word in front of their mind. Itis score. But now some people propose another opinion. They don’t think it isright to value a student is qualified or not only by their scores. As far as Iam concerned, I would stand in the latter side, because I think to qualifystudents only by score is one-side and not good for the development ofstudents.
如何评价学生?当谈到这个问题时,我想大多数人都会在他们脑海里浮现一个词。那就是分数。但现在有人提出另一种看法。他们认为只根据分数来衡量学生是否合格是不对的。就我而言,我支持后者,因为我认为只通过分数来评价学生是否合格是片面的,并不利于学生的发展。
The first and foremost, to value studentsonly by scores is not good for their development. If the unique expectation forstudents is to get high scores, students will become high marks imbecile. Theymay know nothing except study. In the long term, it will have negative effecton their life and future career. If a person can’t take care of themselves, howcan they do well in other things? In addition, their school life must be verybored, because there is only study in it.
首先,只通过成绩来衡量学生不利于学生的发展。如果学生的唯一期望就是得高分,学生们会变成学生高分低能儿。他们可能除了学习之外就一无所知。从长远来看,这会影响到他们的生活和未来职业。如果一个人不能好好照顾自己,他怎么能把其他事情做好呢?此外,他们的校园生活肯定很无聊,因为只有学习。
Secondly, evaluating students only fromgrade will let employers lose some excellent employees. In the employmentmarket, most employers will judge a student is qualified or not according theirmarks in school. However, sometimes the high mark students are not suitable tothat job for one hundred percent. And different people may have differenttalents. Not everyone’s specialty is study. Not to lose any talent, theemployers should value students in full sides.
其次,只通过分数来评价学生会让雇主失去一些优秀的员工。在就业市场上,大多数雇主会根据他们在学校的成绩去判断一个学生是否合格。然而,高分的学生并不是百分百就适合这个岗位。不同的人有不同的能力。不是每个人的专长都是学习。为了不失去任何人才,雇主们应该全面地评价学生。
In general, to judge a student is qualifiedor not only by scores is not a wise way in the long term. We should look at problems all-sidedly.
一般来说,只根据成绩来判断一个学生是否合格从长期来看并不是明智的方式。我们要全面地看问题。
世界杯上的“反歧视日”
日本执政党就解禁“集体自卫权”达成一致
“目标价格”制度将取代农业补贴
中国银行否认为移民“洗钱”
韩国“济州岛”80%购房者为中国人
美葡战平 一起学学“平局”的英文说法
世界杯半决赛史上最大“比分失利”
意英回家 哥希“出线”
河南现大批高考“替考”
天气闷热 世界杯首现“喝水暂停”
从戴安娜到凯特:看英国的“王室效应”
足球场上的“假摔”及其它欺诈行为
“倒卖进京户口指标”团伙落网
京沪穗汉将试点“反按揭”
中韩货币将实现“直接交易”
盘古氏告《变形金刚4》合作方“合同欺诈”
埃及倡议巴以“停火”
了解“中美战略经济对话”
“射手榜”三足鼎立
北京将严控“天桥积水”
新规定:公务出行不得购买“全价机票”
北京有望2017年通“七环”
金砖国家将成立“新发展银行”
“点球大战”决胜负
越南“冲撞”中方船只
京东打“墙面广告”进军农村
“背包游”改变国人海外消费
教育部新政收紧“高考加分”
守门员“扑球”的各种说法
国产埃博拉“检测试剂”获批文
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |