Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
答案:AABDB
两会时间:听政协委员怎么说
揭秘:八大你不得不知的面试问题[1]
追《太阳的后裔》有风险?有了这8样东西就不怕了
你的接吻方式暴露了什么?[1]
国外专家:小李子获2016奥斯卡影帝“无悬念”
美音乐奇才Prince逝世 各路音乐人发推纪念
怎么整容才最美?视频揭各国美女标准[1]
老外给总理提建议[1]
2050年世界半数人口将是近视眼
美打造《饥饿游戏》电影主题公园 预计2019年前开放
2016奥斯卡奖精华看点汇总(附小李子获奖感言视频)[1]
“雪诺”新戏裸照流出 坦言“不爱露”[1]
2016李克强总理记者会文字实录(双语)[1]
奇葩DIY:塑料瓶喷头 扫把雨刮器[1]
奇才老太做出电影主题蛋糕[1]
牛津刁钻面试样题:海盗如何分宝?为什么很多动物有条纹?
神吐槽:17种奇葩的乘机行为[1]
“极限捏手机”你敢玩吗?[1]
“龙母”大方谈起全裸镜头称自己很骄傲
凯特首赴白金汉宫国宴 英媒提点王妃注意事项[1]
肯尼亚女子靠PS“游”中国 终获资助旅行
屁蛋、无头兔…网民热衷于分享“复活节败笔”
期末备考太无聊 英网友玩“插笔挑战”
反脸相向:推特惊现诡异自拍
喵星人的心事你能懂:喵星人14种摇尾方式详解[1]
心真大!埃及航空人质与劫机犯玩自拍
夏洛特,原来你是这样的小公主
这4位好莱坞女星的母语竟然不是英语[1]
活植物珠宝,边戴边长!(组图)[1]
七幅地图带你从七个角度看世界[1]
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |