Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
答案:AABDB
GRE阅读分割方法巧利用
GRE阅读词汇记忆比例8%就可以
GRE阅读中的文字价值
GRE阅读长句难句分析解剖
GRE阅读考试准备方法及技巧
GRE阅读难句分类训练法
GRE阅读两种形式主题句解析
GRE考试阅读备考解题方法
新旧GRE阅读有哪些区别?
6方面备考GRE阅读才能得高分
GRE阅读套路规则解析
轻松记GRE阅读考试单词
GRE阅读复杂学术语应对办法
GRE阅读高分两大方法顺利度难关
甄别GRE阅读文章4大原则
如何应对GRE阅读陌生词汇?
新GRE阅读五步走
如何应对GRE阅读复杂学术语?
GRE阅读逻辑题出题规律解析
GRE阅读长难句训练法则
GRE阅读长难句举例解析
怎样进行GRE阅读速度训练?
GRE阅读训练方法及要点解析
GRE阅读解题技巧4则
准确把握GRE阅读词汇含义方法
GRE阅读类比思维解题方法
GRE阅读高频题目之乙醇汽油
GRE阅读速度提高6大法门
GRE阅读细节题两方面技巧
GRE阅读理解真题解析(乙醇汽油)
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |