Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
答案:AABDB
GRE重点单词语境记忆(4)
我们究竟需要多少GRE词汇
张安琪:GRE词汇量从5000到20000的转变
包含"it"GRE词汇精选汇总
背诵GRE词汇需要注意的问题总结
GRE红宝书词汇精选(1)
GRE词汇难易度实例分析
如何合理安排GRE词汇背诵时间
GRE词汇词根整理之duc
背诵GRE词汇的意义
GRE词汇的备考步骤
GRE词汇记忆:对比记忆法
GRE考试必备的600个高频词汇:C
GRE重点单词语境记忆(1)
从词汇考察内容解析GRE词汇记忆技巧
GRE词汇故事记忆法:青霉素的发现
三个月拿下GRE词汇经验
为什么GRE词汇很难记?
新旧GRE词汇量要求的变化
GRE考试新手如何入手GRE词汇背诵?
GRE填空对比词汇整理
新GRE词汇记忆四种方法三个切记
新版GRE红宝书缺失词汇补充
GRE分类词汇:房屋词汇
GRE重点单词语境记忆(2)
轻松记忆GRE词汇的4个心得分享
GRE词汇背诵拆分联想法介绍
GRE考试词汇考察方法简介
GRE反义词汇总结
中国特色的GRE词汇整理(2)
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |