Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
答案:AABDB
中招了吗?14件90后开始经历的事
小孩童大智慧:永不过时的外国童话书
如何提高阅读能力?KWL阅读方法来助力
英国警察不减肥就会丢掉工作?
七个非同一般的小国:一起去吧!
哈利波特外传敲定!小雀斑出演男一号
高考大日子:世界各地的高校入学考试
高情商的人才有的18个特质
迈克尔•杰克逊梦幻庄园出售:标价1亿
全美最肥喵星人:体重相当4岁男孩
13句受用终生的人生格言
25个小短句 测试你的英语水平
2017年最受游客欢迎的十个城市
职场创造力:获得灵感的5种方法
减肥不用节食!7款低热量美味食材
美女们请注意!千万别在简历上附照片!
人类能否在两三年内治愈癌症
英国看病全免费?留学生就医3大绝招
教你如何正确地请教他人
谁更高大上? 热门英剧角色口音大盘点
阅读推荐:爱因斯坦最爱的5本书
男人心声:你的10个细节令他偷偷高兴
大学毕业生成为人生赢家的九个诀窍
韩国妹子卸妆视频走红网络
A型人格的11条纠结特质 中招否?
爆笑街头采访经典问题:爱爸爸or爱妈妈?
外国人眼中的高考 理想与现实的差距
献给丢失爱情的你:戛纳获奖短片Sign笔记
囧研究 你喝的每一杯水都是恐龙尿
晒幸福or自黑:马尔福和哈利恋爱了?
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |