Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
参考答案:AABDB
为什么心情不好时爱吃垃圾食品
白宫提名耶伦成为美联储首位女主席
分享阳光:让别人快乐的20种方式
如何面对缺失的校园性教育
保值储蓄不保值:如何保住自己的钱
同事交恶怎么办 别忘了微笑
情侣装:中国爱人之间的特殊示爱方式
英国六口之家放弃安居房,朋友家院子搭帐篷
瑞典科学家发明死亡手表 倒数生命
新生活:今天尝试做的30件新鲜事
爱生活:8件点亮心情的日常小事
在线教育网站Coursera与网易公开课合作
男子重达900斤 减肥成功后喜获爱情
8个你需要戒掉的坏习惯 统统丢掉!
你愿意和另一半分担订婚戒指的费用吗?
最可爱!萌猫红小胖Snoopy爆红网络
iphone的历史:不只是初始开发成本的1.5亿美元
讨厌自己的工作 为什么还在坚持?
英媒公布2013世界大学排名:北大清华排前50
婚戒丢失41年后再度找回
同性恋演员在好莱坞仍被歧视
伦敦警方上演现实版《少数派报告》
你家宠物吃太胖?也许是因为不开心
今天下班后就要开始做的15件事
潘石屹接受采访口吃 大V也害怕?
有创意的人20大特质 说的是你么?
婴儿爬向海边险落水 小狗英勇挡道
英半数飞行员驾驶中打盹 延长飞行时间引担忧
亿万富翁的贫富分化解决方案
你不会聊天:10个常见的对话错误
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |