Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
参考答案:AABDB
SAT阅读完成句子题分类介绍
SAT阅读小说类材料的阅读方法
SAT阅读小说:UNCLE SILAS系列(2)
SAT OG阅读文章分类解析
SAT考试阅读常见问题FAQ
带你闯过SAT阅读四大难关
SAT阅读填空题真题两道
SAT阅读信号词总结
SAT阅读文章特点分析
SAT阅读完成句子题答题规律
SAT和托福阅读考试的不同之处
SAT阅读真题考什么?
SAT阅读填空题三道(逻辑关系)
提高SAT阅读成绩的三种定位词
如何加快SAT阅读速度?
解读SAT阅读中的双篇对比文章
SAT阅读怎么提高---掌握选项特点
SAT阅读考试内容详解
SAT阅读文章方法
提高SAT阅读成绩需要抓住主题
如何提高SAT阅读速度?
SAT阅读小说:UNCLE SILAS系列(1)
SAT阅读要求及应对方法
SAT阅读考试内容一览
SAT阅读题解题策略
3道SAT阅读填空题练习
SAT阅读真题长难句解析2道
SAT阅读题型分类总结
SAT阅读扩展:Elizabeth Taylor
SAT阅读真题小说节选
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |