Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
参考答案:AABDB
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《美女与野兽》:全自动砍柴机
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《小美人鱼》: 人鱼的百年好合
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《美女与野兽》:转角走岔路了
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《小飞侠》:我们出海吧!
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《公主与青蛙》:超级无敌大懒虫
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《小美人鱼》:如何打动王子的心
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《公主与青蛙》:善恶终有报
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《公主与青蛙》:事情真相大白
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《公主与青蛙》:别愣着快动手
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《美女与野兽》:你看起来有点傻
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《美女与野兽》:你看着办吧
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《美女与野兽》:反客为主是不对的
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《公主与青蛙》:精疲力尽却无回报
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《公主与青蛙》:真蛙告白
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《小美人鱼》: 女巫也不能当小三
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《美女与野兽》:思考是件危险的事
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《美女与野兽》:如何打动女孩的心
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《公主与青蛙》:最美丽的萤火虫
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《小美人鱼》:鱼尾巴没有了
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《小飞侠》:你是个丑女孩!
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《公主与青蛙》:奄奄一息
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《美女与野兽》:完美结局
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《小飞侠》:准备开火!
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《美女与野兽》:她是我们的贵客
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《美女与野兽》:不吃你就别吃了!
少儿英语圣经故事01:Story of Joseph约瑟的故事
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《公主与青蛙》:浪漫烛光晚餐
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《美女与野兽》:他学会了如何去爱
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《小飞侠》:你知道错了没?
迪斯尼动画儿童英语故事《小飞侠》:女孩子们总是说话太多
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |