Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
参考答案:AABDB
牛津实用英语语法:95 above, over, under, below, beneath等
牛津实用英语语法:97 动词和介词
牛津实用英语语法:68 you,one和they作不定代词
牛津实用英语语法:105 否定疑问式
牛津实用英语语法:85 whoever,whichever,whatever,whenever,
牛津实用英语语法:82 连接性关系从句
牛津实用英语语法:136 can和 be able的各种形式
牛津实用英语语法:98 介词后的动名词
牛津实用英语语法:87 介词的位置
牛津实用英语语法:88 间接宾语前to和for的省略
牛津实用英语语法:120 had better+不带to的不定式
牛津实用英语语法:118 构成各种时态的形式及用法
牛津实用英语语法:103 各种时态的否定形式
牛津实用英语语法:106 助动词及情态动词
牛津实用英语语法:132 may/might表示可能
牛津实用英语语法:102 主动语态形式一览表
牛津实用英语语法:114 be+不定式
牛津实用英语语法:116 there is/are/was/were等
牛津实用英语语法:128 can用来表示许可
牛津实用英语语法:137 can/am able,could/was able
牛津实用英语语法:122 have意指possess(拥有)
牛津实用英语语法:119 have+宾语+过去分词
牛津实用英语语法:127 may用来表示许可
牛津实用英语语法:135 can表示可能
牛津实用英语语法:117 it is和there is的比较
牛津实用英语语法:86 介词概说
牛津实用英语语法:124 形式
牛津实用英语语法:130 could或 was/were allowed to
牛津实用英语语法:100 动词的分类
牛津实用英语语法:92 表示时间的介词to,till/until
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |