Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
专家点评:SAT写作应避免的错误
SAT写作:认知你论文的读者和目的
SAT作文中间段修改实例讲解(二)
SAT写作名人素材艾柯卡
SAT写作法则及实例:文章由始至终的使用简单的语句
SAT作文常用的100个词语搭配 下
SAT考试写作素材two horses
九步修改你的SAT作文
一篇优秀SAT作文范例
100个SAT热点词汇
SAT写作题目总结35-40
SAT写作法则及实例:合并短句
SAT作文素材 Iacocca自述
SAT写作常用固定搭配
SAT写作素材——名人生平(4)
SAT写作法则及实例:在文章中使用借词
SAT作文常见论据解析
SAT作文备考策略
SAT写作法则及实例:建议不要使用的词汇
SAT写作题目大全 81-86
SAT写作人物论据Franklin Delano Roosevelt
10月SAT考试真题之写作范文
SAT写作:满分作文欣赏
一篇SAT作文的实例讲解
SAT写作法则及实例:避免使用俚语
SAT作文:想得高分 控制写作速度是关键
SAT写作名人素材Iacocca 英文
SAT写作练习十大话题
SAT作文素材 爱因斯坦
SAT考试作文范文一篇
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |