Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
答案:AABDB
男童遭绑架连唱3小时圣歌 逼疯绑匪被释放
爱担心VS.乐天派:忧虑来袭时,教你11招
美国蒙面男持土豆抢劫 抢得20元假钞
睡觉的时候,动物们都做什么梦?
舌尖上的中国为何这么火?
跨国恋背后的艰辛与浪漫
看唇膏消费差异折射出社会贫富差距
五种应该多吃的白色蔬菜
后天学者症候群:男子头部被打后成数学天才
内地孩童香港当街小便事件引热议
美媒致切尔西孩子:生为希拉里道具 伪装过一生
九大事实为证:传统的性别角色?胡扯!
繁琐的文化规范
这辈子你富不起来的十大原因
机智!女童借与米歇尔见面机会递父亲简历
时间都去哪儿了?你在浪费生命的13件事
美国3名女同性恋结婚 3人家庭将迎新成员
《生活大爆炸》谢耳朵教会我们的20件事
给爱旅游的你:穷游欧洲的实用小贴士
“岁月号”沉船打捞出遗体 学生曾试图逃生
为什么被理想学校拒录并非世界末日?
商务人士 一部手机不够用怎么办?
英女王迎来88岁寿辰 王室公布其最新肖像照
读书日特别推荐:“改变美国青少年人生的书籍”
再见NOKIA:诺基亚将更名微软移动Oy
《舌尖上的中国2》被指抄袭BBC纪录片
英媒评出十佳亚洲小说 《红楼梦》居首
奥巴马:如果普京溺水 我绝对会救他
凯特王妃用衣服给儿子乔治擦口水
2017年世界读书日:我们为什么要阅读?
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |