Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
答案:AABDB
囧研究:为什么化妆品都死贵死贵的?
老外也恨读名著!一星差评网带你喷文学著作
囧研究:为何Siri语音助手都是女声?
给未来IT工程师们的10条骨灰级建议
白宫与国会星期天将再次商讨结束政府部分关闭
5个神准的身体测试:性格特点立见分晓!
我们究竟要吃什么才能不致癌?
英新护照引发性别歧视口水战
神总结拖延症的一天:你中枪了吗
广州拟推行痛经假引发网友热议
西安8岁神童智商竟然高达146
习大大卡梅伦去的那间酒吧已被中国人占领!
生活中寻找快乐:Facebook教我的7堂课
大脑分性别雄脑更会赚钱:你的脑是男是女?
为什么弹性工作制度更利于高效的工作?
广电总局将严厉整治票房造假
姑娘,这样自拍最美:秀出头发,不拍额头,撇开伙伴
直接发钱能帮助穷人吗?
2017年将成史上最热年份
你的哥哥姐姐是否比你更聪明
推荐:最适合女人独自旅行的城市TOP5
万圣节来袭:化妆师让迪士尼公主变身恐怖主角
研究表明:晚睡容易让你的体重增加!
一张图带你深扒:英国女王私宅都有啥陈设
帅哥变迁史 1分钟看遍百年男神造型改变
习主席和马英九将在新加坡举行历史性会面
为什么要娶一个情感丰富的女人
我国去年网购正品率不足六成 投诉率居高不下
心理学家解析九大常见梦境
这些健康新知识 你了解多少
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |