Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
答案:AABDB
雅思听力训练需要做到三原则和四个字
雅思听力陷阱词之条件词
雅思听力中的“一分钟恐怖”和“连续作战”
为什么雅思听力听不懂还爱出错?
雅思听力常考英美国家的地名
雅思听力特点:文章场景性强 专业话题多
词汇联想法助你突破雅思听力词汇
雅思听力不可忽视听说能力的锻炼
走进雅思 带你全方位了解雅思听力
雅思听力动植物场景词汇整理
雅思听力备考 剑桥系列做3遍就够了
雅思听力电话号码场景的应试技巧介绍
雅思听力训练应培养猜字能力
详解雅思听力考试中的填空题
为什么雅思听力第二遍才能听懂?
看故事学雅思听力:新生入学主题高频词汇
详解雅思听力中的顺序原则与重复原则
雅思听力相貌场景备考指导
雅思听力大小写的问题不可忽视
雅思听力的三个特点及难点指导
雅思听力数字题目的考点归纳
雅思听力7大陷阱需小心
有效攻克雅思听力学术讲座题的三个步骤
教学经验:“三级跳”有效提高雅思听力水平
雅思听力名词复数形式的细节不可忽视
雅思听力中的理解、辨别和听写
避免雅思听力出现失误的应对方法
雅思听力听说训练需要注意的三点
如何应对雅思听力中的填空题
雅思听力咨询与申请场景的要点整理
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |