Citing facts drawn from the color-film processing industry that indicate a downward trend in the costs of film processing over a 24-year period, the author argues that Olympic Foods will likewise be able to minimize costs and thus maximize profits in the future. In support of this conclusion the author cites the general principle that as organizations learn how to do things better, they become more efficient. This principle, coupled with the fact that OlympicFoods has had 25 years of experience in the food processing industry leads to the authors rosy prediction. This argument is unconvincing because it suffers from two critical flaws.
First, the authors forecast of minimal costs and maximum profits rests on the gratuitous assumption that Olympic Foods long experience has taught it how to do things better. There is, however, no guarantee that this is the case. Nor does the author cite any evidence to support this assumption. Just as likely, Olympic Foods has learned nothing from its 25 years in the food-processing business. Lacking this assumption, the expectation of increased efficiency is entirely unfounded.
Second, it is highly doubtful that the facts drawn from the color-film processing industry are applicable to the food processing industry. Differences between the two industries clearly outweigh the similarities, thus making the analogy highly less than valid. For example, problems of spoilage, contamination, and timely transportation all affect the food industry but are virtually absent in the film-processing industry. Problems such as these might present insurmountable obstacles that prevent lowering food-processing costs in the future.
As it stands the authors argument is not compelling. To strengthen the conclusion that Olympic Foods will enjoy minimal costs and maximum profits in the future, the author would have to provide evidence that the company has learned how to do things better as a result of its 25 years of experience. Supporting examples drawn from industries more similar to the food-processing industry would further substantiate the authors view.
2.
In this argument the author concludes that the Apogee Company should dose down field offices and conduct all its operations from a single, centralized location because the company had been more profitable in the past when all its operations were in one location. For a couple of reasons, this argument is not very convincing.
First, the author assumes that centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and streamlining supervision of employees. This assumption is never supported with any data or projections. Moreover, the assumption fails to take into account cost increases and inefficiency that could result from centralization. For instance, company representatives would have to travel to do business in areas formerly served by a field office, creating travel costs and loss of critical time. In short, this assumption must be supported with a thorough cost-benefit analysis of centralization versus other possible cost-cutting and/or profit-enhancing strategies.
Second, the only reason offered by the author is the claim that Apogee was more profitable when it had operated from a single, centralized location. But is centralization the only difference relevant to greater past profitability? It is entirely possible that management has become lax regarding any number of factors that can affect the bottom line such as inferior products, careless product pricing, inefficient production, poor employee expense account monitoring, ineffective advertising, sloppy buying policies and other wasteful spending. Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to diminishing profits, this argument commits the fallacy of assuming that just because one event follows another , the second event has been caused by the first.
In conclusion, this is a weak argument. To strengthen the conclusion that Apogee should close field offices and centralize. This author must provide a thorough cost-benefit analysis of available alternatives and rule out factors other than decentralization that might be affecting current profits negatively.
浪漫英文情书精选:My Love Will Reach Any Distance爱无边
精选英语美文阅读:假如生活欺骗了你
精选英语美文阅读:饶孟侃《呼唤》
双语美文:What are you still waiting for?
态度决定一切 Attitude Is Everything
双语阅读:回家的感觉真好
精选英语散文欣赏:微笑挽救生命
浪漫英文情书精选:Is It Love?这是爱么?
精选英语散文欣赏:一棵小苹果树
浪漫英文情书精选:Need You With Me需要你爱我
精美散文:27岁的人生
精美散文:守护自己的天使
精选英语美文阅读:How selfless real love is 无私的爱
双语美文:I Wish I Could believe
精选英语美文阅读:你见或者不见我(中英对照)
精美散文:让我们撩起生命的波纹
生命可以是一座玫瑰花园
英文《小王子》温情语录
英语美文:Keep on Singing
精选英语美文阅读:A Friend's Prayer 朋友的祈祷
如果生命可以重来(双语)
双语散文: Optimism and Pessimistic
伤感美文:人生若只如初见
最美的英文情诗:请允许我成为你的夏季
人生哲理:年轻无悔 别停下追寻梦想的脚步
浪漫英文情书精选:The Best Surprise最好的惊喜
美文欣赏:海边漫步
浪漫英文情书精选:Could This Be Real?这是真的吗?
浪漫英文情书精选:Keep You Forever永远温存着你
浪漫英文情书精选:My Everything我的一切
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |