21. The conclusion of this editorial is that the government should lower property taxes
for railroad companies. The first reason given is that railroads spend billions per year
maintaining and upgrading their facilities. The second reason is that shipping goods by
rail is cost-effective and environmentally sound. This argument is unconvincing for
several reasons.
First of alt, the argument depends upon a misleading comparison between railroad
and truck company expenditures. Although trucking companies do not pay property tax
on roads they use, they do pay such taxes on the yards, warehouses and maintenance
facilities they own. And while trucking companies pay only a portion of road
maintenance costs, this is because they are not sole users of public roads. Railroad
companies shoulder the entire burden of maintenance and taxes on their own facilities
and tracks; but they distribute these costs to other users through usage fees.
In addition, the author assumes that property taxes should be structured to provide
incentives for cost-effective and environmentally beneficial business practices. This
assumption is questionable because property taxes are normally structured to reflect the
value of property. Moreover, the author seems to think that cost-effectiveness and
environmental soundness are equally relevant to the question of tax relief. However,
these are separate considerations. The environmental soundness of a practice might be
relevant in determining tax structuring, but society does not compensate a business for
its cost-efficiency.
Splitting the issues of cost-efficiency and environmental impact highlights an
ambiguity in the claim that railway shipping is more appropriate. On the one hand, it
may be appropriate, or prudent, for me to ship furniture by rail because it is cost-
effective; on the other hand, it might be appropriate, or socially correct, to encourage
more railway shipping because it is environmentally sound. The argument thus trades
on an equivocation between social correctness on the one hand, and personal or business
prudence on the other.
In sum, this argument is a confusion of weak comparisons, mixed issues and
equivocal claims. I would not accept the conclusion without first determining: the
factors relevant to tax structure, whether specific tax benefits should accrue to
property as well as to income and capital gains taxes, whether railway shipping
really does provide greater social benefits, and whether it is correct to motivate more
railway shipping on this basis.
惊蛰
请天鹅捎去祝福
疲惫和轻巧的脚步
恩情无限,真诚回馈
球台下的脚步
水
你还会浮躁吗
越来越多种动物被确诊新冠病毒
给市长的一封信
体坛英语资讯:World Athletics postpones three more Diamond League events
国内英语资讯:Chinas top legislature proposes to adjust agenda of standing committee session
墙
国内英语资讯:China firmly opposes U.S. restrictions on Chinese tech giant Huawei
生日
已经不怕新冠肺炎了?豪华邮轮订票量飙升翻倍
祈祷明天,祈祷美丽
体坛英语资讯:Chinese Olympic Committee supports IOC decision on new dates for Tokyo 2020
暖心!世卫组织给武汉中学生手写回信,这中文太工整了!
国内英语资讯:Guangdong, Hong Kong, Macao studying mutual recognition of quarantine measures, virus testin
让民族精神走进心灵
有人夸我的裙子很美
国内英语资讯:Spotlight: What China has done to boost intl cooperation against COVID-19
体坛英语资讯:Atletico Mineiro boss Sampaoli eyes Santos quartet
如何改变自己的生活习惯
记住自己失败的时候
520上新!央行发行心形纪念币
我眼中,你最美
活力四射的初三岁月
幸福的真谛
新研究:男人的肺似乎更易感染新冠病毒
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |