开头段模板 The conclusion endorsed in this argument is that. Several reasons are offered in support of this argument. First of all whats more of equal importance is that. At first glance, the authors argument appears to be somewhat convincing, but further reflection reveals that the conclusion is based on some dubious assumptions and the reasoning is biased due to the inadequacy and partiality in the nature of evidence provided to justify the conclusion. A careful examination would review how groundless this conclusion is.
结尾段模板To conclude, this argument is not persuasive as it stands. Accordingly, it is imprudent for the author to claim that. To make this argument logically acceptable, the author would have to show that. In addition, to solidify the conclusion, the author should provide concrete evidence as well to demonstrate that. Only with more convincing evidence could this argument become more than just an emotional appeal.
选择性样本攻击 A threshold problem is that the author provides no evidence to claim that the general group as a whole is of the same characteristic. The example cited, while suggestive of this trend, is insufficient to warrant its truth because there is no reason to believe that the sample is representative of the whole general group. One need only observe A to appreciate the truth that such evidence would be clearly unrepresentative of the entire general group for obvious reasons. In fact, in face of such limited anecdotal evidence, it is fallacious for the author to draw any conclusion at all.
样本数量攻击 Another problem that seriously weaken the logic of this argument is that the survey cited is based on too small a sample to be reliable. Offered in support of the argument, the only evidence is that. Unless it can be shown that the sample is typical of all general group, the fact that is groundless for claiming that.
Loaded question和诚实性攻击 Whats more, the methodology of the survey is problematic for two reasons. For one thing, we are not informed whether the survey provided only 3 alternatives. If it did, the respondents, who might very well prefer another choice not provided in the survey, might be forced to give up their preferences. For another thing, we are not informed whether the survey response were anonymous or even confidential. If they were not, regardless of whether the responses were truthful, the respondents might supply responses favored by their superiors who might conduct the survey. Both events would lead this survey unreliable, let alone about drawing the conclusion that.
样本代表性攻击Moreover, a possible methodology problem in this argument is that of bias. At first place, the term so many is too vague to be statistically meaningful. Even if by so many the author means nearly all, perhaps workers who were more interested than others in the survey might be more likely to respond to the questionnairepossibly because they found the questionnaire more attractive. Lacking in the information about the number of workers surveyed and the number of respondents, it is impossible to assess the validity of the survey. For instance, if 1000 workers were surveyed but only 10 responded, the result should be highly suspect. Because the author fails to account for other interpretations such as this, the survey would be useless in concluding that.
样本时效性攻击Last but not the least, it is necessary to point out another flaw that significantly undermines this argument that the author neglects to indicate how recently the survey was actually conducted. When used to generally claim a particular group, the samples should be close enough to support the generalization, so as to prevent historical changes from invalidating the generalization. All we know is that the survey is recently published. The less recent the survey itself, the less reliable the results to demonstrate that.
必要性攻击At first place, the author unfairly assumes that A determined solely by B. While B is a seemingly important element in determining A, it is hardly the only or even necessarily required element. This assumption overlooks other crucial criteria in determining Asuch as C, D, to list just a few. Accordingly, without accounting for these potential factors, the author concludes too hastily that these prescriptions cited are the best means of achieving goals.
充分性攻击At second place, the authors solution rests on the assumption that B is sufficient to give birth to the desired goals. However, if it turns out that A is due to a combination of factors, some of which will remain unchanged in the future, such as C and D, mere B might have no stimulating impact on A.
以上为大家推荐了一些GMAT作文考试的实用模板,考生可以适当参考,并通过大量的写作练习来逐步提高自己的GMAT作文的写作水平,从而在GMAT考试中取得更好的成绩。
Better judgement?
体坛英语资讯:Barcelona step up interest in Gremio midfielder Arthur
世界上最古老的已知词语,I,fire, mother等词已是15000岁高龄
很多毕业生并不懂什么叫上班
国际英语资讯:Iran accelerates nuclear propulsion project amid U.S. hostile policies
再穷也有追求美的权利:印度穷人将可免费隆胸
国内英语资讯:CPC proposes listing supervisory commissions as state organs in Constitution
平昌冬奥会闭幕 “北京8分钟”惊艳亮相
国际英语资讯:France, Germany say ready to work with Russia to realize cessation of hostilities in Syria
国际英语资讯:UN Security Council adopts Russian-drafted resolution on renewal of Yemen sanctions
再穷也有追求美的权利:印度穷人将可免费隆胸
国际英语资讯:Chief DPRK delegate says doors open for talks with U.S.: S.Korea
Who Decides the Future 是谁决定了未来
体坛英语资讯:Football long-term project for China
体坛英语资讯:Win in Leganes lifts Real Madrid up to third
四部门联合发文专项治理校外培训机构
体坛英语资讯:Norway, Japan claim mens and womens team pursuit speed skating titles in PyeongChang Gam
请不要再放气球了 它其实是个杀手
川普要求国防部为退伍军人节举行阅兵式做准备
美文赏析:美丽与否,永远都是主观的
兵马俑美国展出被盗走拇指!博物馆里办派对安保漏洞引争议
又到开学季 “学校恐惧症”引关注
体坛英语资讯:Wolfsburg coach Schmidt steps down
国内英语资讯:China establishes national center for new energy vehicles
国内英语资讯:Apple CEO to co-chair Chinas development forum
国际英语资讯:Spotlight: Momentum of inter-Korean detente gives hope of lasting peace
国内英语资讯:China Focus: CPC Central Committee to hold third plenary session
你最爱的H&M衣服,可能来自中国监狱...
涨姿势:英国人最爱的10个形容词
国内英语资讯:Equatorial Guinea president hails cooperation with China
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |