2. The following appeared in a memorandum from the business department of the Apogee Company.
When the Apogee Company had all its operations in one location, it was more profitable than it is today. Therefore, the Apogee Company should close down its field offices and conduct all its operations from a single location. Such centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and helping the company maintain better supervision of all employees.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
In this argument the author concludes that the Apogee Company should close down field offices and conduct all its operations from a single, centralized location because the company had been more profitable in the past when all its operations were in one location. For a couple of reasons, this argument is not very convincing.
First, the author assumes that centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and streamlining supervision of employees. This assumption is never supported with any data or projections. Moreover, the assumption fails to take into account cost increases and inefficiency that could result from centralization. For instance, company representatives would have to travel to do business in areas formerly served by a field office, creating travel costs and loss of critical time. In short, this assumption must be supported with a thorough cost-benefit analysis of centralization versus other possible cost-cutting and/or profit-enhancing strategies.
Second, the only reason offered by the author is the claim that Apogee was more profitable when it had operated from a single, centralized location. But is centralization the only difference relevant to greater past profitability? It is entirely possible that management has become lax regarding any number of factors that can affect the bottom line such as inferior products, careless product pricing, inefficient production, poor employee expense account monitoring, ineffective advertising, sloppy buying policies and other wasteful spending. Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to diminishing profits, this argument commits the fallacy of assuming that just because one event follows another , the second event has been caused by the first.
In conclusion, this is a weak argument. To strengthen the conclusion that Apogee should close field offices and centralize, this author must provide a thorough cost-benefit analysis of available alternatives and rule out factors other than decentralization that might be affecting current profits negatively.
雅思阅读疑难杂症 巧应对
如何有效提高雅思阅读答题质量和速度
雅思阅读题型归纳:Summary (Part 4)
给低龄烤鸭 的雅思阅读 攻略
雅思阅读:考试:认真地对待、积极地准备
喷饭雅思作文经典笑话
雅思阅读:趋势分析及备考方法
雅思阅读长难句
跨过雅思阅读障碍: 解析生词种类做到对症下药
雅思 阅读标题配对 题思路
实例讲解雅思阅读单选题如何 做对
如何备战雅思阅读
揭秘:《 阿凡达》 纳美人外星语言诞生之谜
雅思阅读考试真题词汇收集——摩斯电码
突破雅思阅读考试的 关键
雅思阅读技巧 利用构词法猜测词义
雅思阅读:Choices题型攻略小总结
雅思阅读考试发展方向及准备方法
名师浅谈: 雅思阅读哪一篇更难
雅思阅读SUMMARY 题型解答
名师指导 : 雅思阅读部分最基本复习思路
雅思阅读围绕题型怎样备考
雅思考试辅导: 雅思阅读陌生词汇应对方法
雅思阅读Summary (Part 3 )
雅思阅读真题类似文章 :蚂蚁智力
雅思阅读:Summary(摘要填空)题的终极技巧
雅思阅读泛读中雅思词汇的 心有灵犀
边玩边学、提高雅思阅读能力 (下)
雅思阅读文章(鳄鱼)解析及答案
粗谈雅思阅读的基本复 习思路
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |