2. The following appeared in a memorandum from the business department of the Apogee Company.
When the Apogee Company had all its operations in one location, it was more profitable than it is today. Therefore, the Apogee Company should close down its field offices and conduct all its operations from a single location. Such centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and helping the company maintain better supervision of all employees.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
In this argument the author concludes that the Apogee Company should close down field offices and conduct all its operations from a single, centralized location because the company had been more profitable in the past when all its operations were in one location. For a couple of reasons, this argument is not very convincing.
First, the author assumes that centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and streamlining supervision of employees. This assumption is never supported with any data or projections. Moreover, the assumption fails to take into account cost increases and inefficiency that could result from centralization. For instance, company representatives would have to travel to do business in areas formerly served by a field office, creating travel costs and loss of critical time. In short, this assumption must be supported with a thorough cost-benefit analysis of centralization versus other possible cost-cutting and/or profit-enhancing strategies.
Second, the only reason offered by the author is the claim that Apogee was more profitable when it had operated from a single, centralized location. But is centralization the only difference relevant to greater past profitability? It is entirely possible that management has become lax regarding any number of factors that can affect the bottom line such as inferior products, careless product pricing, inefficient production, poor employee expense account monitoring, ineffective advertising, sloppy buying policies and other wasteful spending. Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to diminishing profits, this argument commits the fallacy of assuming that just because one event follows another , the second event has been caused by the first.
In conclusion, this is a weak argument. To strengthen the conclusion that Apogee should close field offices and centralize, this author must provide a thorough cost-benefit analysis of available alternatives and rule out factors other than decentralization that might be affecting current profits negatively.
2011年实用口语练习:各种哭的说法(一)
英语口语:怎样放“狠话”让对方离你远点
如何用英文表达“我不太想做某事”
2011年实用口语练习:口语当中的ball
2011年实用口语练习:各种睡不着
英语口语-安慰
英文单词 “Do”的活用
如何提高英语口语
2011年实用口语练习:你把事情搞砸了
2011年实用口语练习:昙花一现式的一夜成名
2011年实用口语练习:我是无辜的
如何用英文表达“你活该”
2011年实用口语练习:At the post office 在邮局
2011年实用口语练习:“淘金热”
2011年实用口语练习:高铁开通了
如何用英文表达“满意”
2011年实用口语练习:各种哭的说法(二)
2011年实用口语练习:Join a club 社团活动
2011年实用口语练习:与天气有关的口语(下)
2011年实用口语练习:当猪飞起来的时候
2011年实用口语练习:In the bookstore 在书店里
2011年实用口语练习:说客 拾人牙慧
如何用英文表达“欣赏,感激”
2011年实用口语练习:取钱那些事
2011年实用口语练习:今天我做东
英语口语-商业谨致问候语
2011年实用口语练习:睡或不睡
男生女生:我们可以只当朋友吗?
英文结婚短信祝福语
2011年实用口语练习:生活奢华的猪
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |