Clearly, government has a responsibility to support the arts. However, if that support is going to produce anything of value, government must place no restrictions on the art that is produced.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above? Develop your position by giving specific reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
The speaker argues that government must support the arts but at the same time impose no control over what art is produced. The implicit rationale for government intervention in the arts is that, without it, cultural decline and erosion of our social fabric will result. However, I find no empirical evidence to support this argument, which in any event is unconvincing in light of more persuasive arguments that government should play no part in either supporting or restricting the arts.
First, subsidizing the arts is neither a proper nor necessary job for government. Although public health is generally viewed as critical to a societys very survival and therefore an appropriate concern of government, this concern should not extend tenuously to our cultural health or well-being. A lack of private funding might justify an exception: in my observation; however, philanthropy is alive and well today, especially among the new technology and media moguls.
Second, government cannot possibly play an evenhanded role as arts patron. Inadequate resources call for restrictions; priorities, and choices, it is unconscionable to relegate normative decisions as to which art has value to a few legislators and jurists, who may be unenlightened in their notions about art. Also, legislators are all too likely to make choices in favor of the cultural agendas of those lobbyists with the most money and influence.
Third, restricting artistic expression may in some cases encroach upon the constitutional right of free expression. In any case, governmental restriction may chill creativity, thereby defeating the very purpose of subsidizing the arts.
In the final analysis, government cannot philosophically or economically justify its involvement in the arts, either by subsidy or sanction. Responsibility lies with individuals to determine what art has value and to support that art.
雪天随想
《黑暗骑士崛起》蝉联北美周末票房冠军
我会多采些雏菊花
与反穆斯林影片有关的美国男子被逮捕
注重欢乐:为快乐而做-1
美国应抛弃新帝国主义
中国制造业进阶之路
习惯与目标
日少将任军演副指挥 日本军事影响力强化
中国两基金拟收购德克夏资产管理
AIG与中国人保集团商谈成立合资企业
留澳一年
美丽人生
马石油收购被驳 中国投资者兔死狐悲
技术问题致美股异常波动 部分交易暂停
美国总统辩论为何没有提及印度?
给爱最重的礼物
If the Dream is Big Enough
你是穷人吗?
I “Heard” the Love
女性受教育权不可剥夺
生命即是奇迹
你是我整个世界
三星反诉苹果侵犯其三项专利
“代沟”导致苹果iPhone销量不及预期
寂静的狂欢
iPhone增量式改变或将令苹果面临风险
岛屿争端打击日本对华出口
日本召回驻华大使
香港撞船事故有关细节逐渐浮出水面
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |