The conclusion in this argument is that the state legislature need not consider the views of protesting students. To support this conclusion, the author points out that only 200 of the 12,000 students traveled to the state capitol to voice their concerns about proposed cuts in college programs. Since the remaining students did not take part in this protest, the author concludes they are not interested in this issue. The reasoning in this argument is flawed for two reasons.
First, the author assumes that because only one-tenth of the students took part in the protest, these students views are unrepresentative of the entire student body. This assumption is unwarranted. If it turns out, for example, that the protesting students were randomly selected from the entire student body, their views would reflect the views of the entire college. Without information regarding the way in which the protesting students were selected, it is presumptuous to conclude that their opinions fail to reflect the opinions of their colleagues.
Second, the author cites the fact that the remaining 12,000 students stayed on campus or left for winter break as evidence that they are not concerned about their education. One obvious rejoinder to this line of reasoning is that the students who did not participate did so when they that their concerns would be expressed by the protesting students. In any case, the author has failed to demonstrate a logical connection between the students alleged lack of concern and the fact that they either stayed on campus or left for winter break. Without this connection, the conclusion reached by the author that the remaining 12,000 students are not concerned about their education is unacceptable.
As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically acceptable, the author would have to demonstrate that the protesting students had some characteristic in common that biases their views, thereby nullifying their protest as representative of the entire college.
小编提醒:这些文章的价值不在于它们的语言表达,而在于它们提出的观点具有启发作用。考生们请不要背样文,应背写作模式及每篇的理由。
探析A类雅思阅读判断题的标准
雅思阅读逻辑关系词的阅读功能
雅思阅读是非判断题的涵义
雅思阅读的基础:词汇
雅思时事阅读:英国《自然》杂志向叶诗文和读者道歉
雅思阅读完成句子题的解题要点
雅思阅读常见短语大汇总(二)
雅思阅读List of Heading题型特点及规则
如何切实提高雅思阅读成绩?
以考官观点看雅思阅读考试
镜像法解决雅思阅读判断题
雅思阅读技巧和重点笔记整理(二)
雅思阅读高分在于文章上的功夫
雅思阅读复习指南
雅思阅读段落信息配对题解题思路
雅思阅读技巧和重点笔记整理(三)
提高雅思阅读能力的三大法则
雅思阅读真题文章:蚂蚁如何交流
雅思阅读写作长句分析
雅思阅读真题文章:茶与工业革命
雅思阅读失分原因及解决办法
雅思阅读考试应合理安排时间
雅思阅读的四大障碍及相应对策
雅思阅读段落标题题的应对策略
雅思阅读8种题型的解题方法
雅思阅读真题文章:素描与性格(旧文)
雅思阅读方法与技巧一览
雅思阅读真题文章:化学的发展
雅思阅读平行阅读法介绍
雅思阅读真题文章:物种起源和大陆形成
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |