In this argument the author concludes that the city should allocate some of its arts funding to public television. The conclusion is based on two facts: attendance at the citys art museum has increased proportionally with the increases in visual-arts program viewing on public television, and public television is being threatened by severe cuts in corporate funding. White this argument is somewhat convincing, a few concerns need to be addressed.
To begin with, the argument depends on the assumption that increased exposure to the visual arts on television, mainly public television, has caused a similar increase in local art-museum attendance. However, just because increased art-museum attendance can be statistically correlated with similar increases in television viewing of visual-arts programs, this does not necessarily mean that the increased television viewing of arts is the cause of the rise in museum attendance.
Moreover, perhaps there are other factors relevant to increased interest in the local art museum; for instance, maybe a new director had procured more interesting, exciting acquisitions and exhibits during the period when museum attendance increased, in addition, the author could be overlooking a common cause of both increases. It is possible that some larger social or cultural phenomenon is responsible for greater public interest in both television arts programming and municipal art museums.
To be fair, however, we must recognize that the authors assumption is a special case of a more general one that television viewing affects peoples attitudes and behavior. Common sense and observation tells me that this is indeed the case. After all, advertisers spend billions of dollars on television ad time because they trust this assumption as well.
In conclusion, I am somewhat persuaded by this authors line of reasoning. The argument would be strengthened if the author were to consider and rule out other significant factors that might have caused the increase in visits to the local art museum.
小编提醒:这些文章的价值不在于它们的语言表达,而在于它们提出的观点具有启发作用。考生们请不要背样文,应背写作模式及每篇的理由。
上海“自由贸易试验区”将挂牌
FDI 外国直接投资
提高“信息透明度”
王金平“关说”案
“华盛顿海军工厂”枪击案
“阳澄湖大闸蟹”订单减少
“以房养老”受争议
“厨房废气”成空气治理新焦点
“地方政府债务”逾10万亿
恒大“亚冠”夺冠
奶粉自动售货机 vs. 专营店
湖南严查“破坏选举”案
用好“批评和自我批评”的武器
“劳改所”英语怎么说?
债务展期 debt extension
习近平现身“包子铺”
中国“受污染耕地”达5000万亩
“国家级新区”改革促进政府“职能转变”
第三方支付机构获“跨境支付”牌照
“高铁抽烟”将严惩
户籍“城镇化率”偏低
薄熙来案“宣判”
中印“边防合作协议”
星巴克“遭抨击”
春节前交管部门将开展“安全大检查”
台风“天兔”
首条“跨省地铁”开通
老外在中国参加“午夜弥撒”
“习总套餐”走红
自上而下的“壮士断腕式的”改革
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |