In this argument the author concludes that the city should allocate some of its arts funding to public television. The conclusion is based on two facts: attendance at the citys art museum has increased proportionally with the increases in visual-arts program viewing on public television, and public television is being threatened by severe cuts in corporate funding. White this argument is somewhat convincing, a few concerns need to be addressed.
To begin with, the argument depends on the assumption that increased exposure to the visual arts on television, mainly public television, has caused a similar increase in local art-museum attendance. However, just because increased art-museum attendance can be statistically correlated with similar increases in television viewing of visual-arts programs, this does not necessarily mean that the increased television viewing of arts is the cause of the rise in museum attendance.
Moreover, perhaps there are other factors relevant to increased interest in the local art museum; for instance, maybe a new director had procured more interesting, exciting acquisitions and exhibits during the period when museum attendance increased, in addition, the author could be overlooking a common cause of both increases. It is possible that some larger social or cultural phenomenon is responsible for greater public interest in both television arts programming and municipal art museums.
To be fair, however, we must recognize that the authors assumption is a special case of a more general one that television viewing affects peoples attitudes and behavior. Common sense and observation tells me that this is indeed the case. After all, advertisers spend billions of dollars on television ad time because they trust this assumption as well.
In conclusion, I am somewhat persuaded by this authors line of reasoning. The argument would be strengthened if the author were to consider and rule out other significant factors that might have caused the increase in visits to the local art museum.
小编提醒:这些文章的价值不在于它们的语言表达,而在于它们提出的观点具有启发作用。考生们请不要背样文,应背写作模式及每篇的理由。
雅思阅读真题相似文章:全球变暖
雅思阅读真题相似文章:生物防治病虫害
雅思阅读电影:飞越疯人院
雅思阅读:沃尔玛最能代表美国
雅思阅读:你不知道的词义用法(下)
雅思阅读模拟真题:How to increase sales
决定雅思阅读高分的四大要素
雅思阅读:英国饮食文化之早餐篇
如何应对雅思阅读中的生词
雅思阅读倒计时1个月复习计划
雅思阅读中必须避免的“七宗罪”
雅思阅读高分应试策略
雅思阅读材料:How come you didn't see the whole of the Moon?
雅思阅读:法国呼吁市民微笑迎游客
雅思阅读模拟试题:Dont wash those fossils
考场注意事项:四步应对雅思阅读
雅思阅读搭配题解题技巧讲解
详解雅思阅读所必备的四大技能
雅思阅读:爱尔兰口音获评全球“最性感口音”
雅思阅读模拟真题:Dont wash those fossils
雅思阅读备考五大攻略
雅思阅读解析对策:要“全”要“准”
雅思阅读:世界上最慷慨的14人
雅思阅读模拟试题:How to increase sales
雅思阅读真题词汇:老龄职工
雅思阅读真题词汇:蚂蚁防虫
雅思阅读:你不知道的词义用法(上)
雅思阅读词汇:高频同义词整理
《剑桥雅思7》阅读题型分析
题目?文章?三种方法拿下雅思阅读
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |