The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper. This past winter, 200 students from Waymarsh State College traveled to the state capitol building to protest against proposed cuts in funding for various state college programs. The other 12,000 Waymarsh students evidently werent so concerned about their education: they either stayed on campus or left for winter break. Since the group who did not protest is far more numerous, it is more representative of the states college students than are the protesters. Therefore the state legislature need not heed the appeals of the protesting students. Discuss how well reasoned.。. etc.
The conclusion in this argument is that the state legislature need not consider the views of protesting students. To support this conclusion, the author points out that only 200 of the 12,000 students traveled to the state capitol to voice their concerns about proposed cuts in college programs. Since the remaining students did not take part in this protest, the author concludes they are not interested in this issue. The reasoning in this argument is flawed for two reasons.
First, the author assumes that because only one-tenth of the students took part in the protest, these students views are unrepresentative of the entire student body. This assumption is unwarranted. If it turns out, for example, that the protesting students were randomly selected from the entire student body, their views would reflect the views of the entire college. Without information regarding the way in which the protesting students were selected, it is presumptuous to conclude that their opinions fail to reflect the opinions of their colleagues.
Second, the author cites the fact that the remaining 12,000 students stayed on campus or left for winter break as evidence that they are not concerned about their education. One obvious rejoinder to this line of reasoning is that the students who did not participate did so with the knowledge that their concerns would be expressed by the protesting students. In any case, the author has failed to demonstrate a logical connection between the students alleged lack of concern and the fact that they either stayed on campus or left for winter break. Without this connection, the conclusion reached by the author that the remaining 12,000 students are not concerned about their education is unacceptable.
As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically acceptable, the author would have to demonstrate that the protesting students had some characteristic in common that biases their views, thereby nullifying their protest as representative of the entire college.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
2016届高考英语二轮复习检测训练:选修8 Unit 2 Cloning(新人教版)
总理访澳展现“户外外交”
体坛英语资讯:Slovakia beats Malta 3-1 in World Cup qualifier
2016届高考英语二轮复习阶段滚动补偿练:7
国际英语资讯:GERB party leads in Bulgarias parliamentary elections: exit polls
2016届高考英语二轮复习阶段滚动补偿练:3
体坛英语资讯:Germany keep perfect record, England down Lithuania in World Cup qualifiers
2017届高考英语一轮复习知识梳理练习:必修1 Unit 3 Celebration(北师大版)
2016届高考英语二轮复习阶段滚动补偿练:5
2016届广东天河区重点高中高考英语专题训练课件: 代词01
国际英语资讯:Pakistani authorities nab 100 Indian fishermen, 19 boats
2016届高考英语二轮复习阶段滚动补偿练:2
博鳌论坛全球化宣言全文(双语)
2016届广东天河区重点高中高考英语专题训练课件: 冠词
2017届高考英语一轮复习知识梳理练习:必修3 Unit 9 Wheels(北师大版)
2016届广东天河区重点高中高考英语专题训练课件: 代词02
2017届高考英语一轮复习知识梳理练习:必修4 Unit 11 The Media(北师大版)
2016届高考英语二轮复习检测训练:选修8 Unit 1 A land of diversity(新人教版)
2016届广东天河区重点高中高考英语专题训练课件: 名词、冠词与介词02
2017届高考英语一轮复习知识梳理练习:必修3 Unit 7 The Sea(北师大版)
这些时尚单品今年还流行 你入手了吗?
2016届广东天河区重点高中高考英语专题训练课件: 连词与状语从句01
美国酿酒厂用下水酿啤酒 顾客称味道好极了
2017届高考英语一轮复习知识梳理练习:必修1 Unit 2 Heroes(北师大版)
2016届广东天河区重点高中高考英语专题训练课件: 连词与状语从句02
2016届高考英语二轮复习阶段滚动补偿练:11
2016届高考英语二轮复习阶段滚动补偿练:9
2016届高考英语二轮复习阶段滚动补偿练:8
2016届高考英语二轮复习检测训练:选修8 Unit 3 Inventors and inventions(新人教版)
2016届高考英语二轮复习阶段滚动补偿练:12
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |