The following appeared in the editorial section of a corporate newsletter. The common notion that workers are generally apathetic about management issues is false, or at least outdated: a recently published survey indicates that 79 percent of the nearly 1,200 workers who responded to survey questionnaires expressed a high level of interest in the topics of corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs. Discuss how well reasoned.。. etc.
Based upon a survey among workers that indicates a high level of interest in the topics of corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, the author concludes that workers are not apathetic about management issues. Specifically, it is argued that since 79 percent of the 1200 workers who responded to survey expressed interest in these topics, the notion that workers are apathetic about management issues is incorrect. The reasoning in this argument is problematic in several respects.
First, the statistics cited in the editorial may be misleading because the total number of workers employed by the corporation is not specified. For example, if the corporation employs 2000 workers, the fact that 79 percent of the nearly 1200 respondents showed interest in these topics provides strong support for the conclusion. On the other hand, if the corporation employs 200,000 workers, the conclusion is much weaker.
Another problem with the argument is that the respondents views are not necessarily representative of the views of the work force in general. For example, because the survey has to do with apathy, it makes sense that only less apathetic workers would respond to it, thereby distorting the overall picture of apathy among the work force. Without knowing how the survey was conducted, it is impossible to assess whether or not this is the case.
A third problem with the argument is that it makes a hasty generalization about the types of issues workers are interested in. It accords with common sense that workers would be interested in corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, since these issues affect workers very directly. However, it is unfair to assume that workers would be similarly interested in other management issuesones that do not affect them or affect them less directly.
In conclusion, this argument is not convincing as it stands. To strengthen it, the author would have to show that the respondents account for a significant and representative portion of all workers. Additionally, the author must provide evidence of workers interest other management topicsnot just those that affect workers directly.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
雅思口语话题预测
雅思阅读必看文章郁金香
雅思写作预测及练习题
雅思写作预测2
必看雅思阅读文章欧洲运输业
雅思阅读文章预测
雅思口语预测Driving
G类雅思大作文题目预测
雅思口语预测Part1
雅思口语预测练习汇总附参考答案
雅思口语最新调整1
A类雅思写作预测
雅思口语预测Birds
G类雅思大作文预测
雅思口语最新调整4
雅思口语预测及解析
雅思口语预测Part2
雅思阅读必看文章Decisionmaking
雅思阅读必看文章岩洞艺术
必看雅思阅读文章苏联劳动时间的变化
雅思口语预测Internet
雅思阅读必看文章茶与工业革命
雅思阅读必看文章之竹子
雅思口语预测Part1Hometown
雅思阅读必看的文章
雅思大作文紧急练笔题
雅思阅读必看文章人脸识别
必看雅思阅读文章广告始祖
雅思阅读必看文章竹子
雅思阅读必看文章药片包装
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |