The following appeared in the editorial section of a corporate newsletter. The common notion that workers are generally apathetic about management issues is false, or at least outdated: a recently published survey indicates that 79 percent of the nearly 1,200 workers who responded to survey questionnaires expressed a high level of interest in the topics of corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs. Discuss how well reasoned.。. etc.
Based upon a survey among workers that indicates a high level of interest in the topics of corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, the author concludes that workers are not apathetic about management issues. Specifically, it is argued that since 79 percent of the 1200 workers who responded to survey expressed interest in these topics, the notion that workers are apathetic about management issues is incorrect. The reasoning in this argument is problematic in several respects.
First, the statistics cited in the editorial may be misleading because the total number of workers employed by the corporation is not specified. For example, if the corporation employs 2000 workers, the fact that 79 percent of the nearly 1200 respondents showed interest in these topics provides strong support for the conclusion. On the other hand, if the corporation employs 200,000 workers, the conclusion is much weaker.
Another problem with the argument is that the respondents views are not necessarily representative of the views of the work force in general. For example, because the survey has to do with apathy, it makes sense that only less apathetic workers would respond to it, thereby distorting the overall picture of apathy among the work force. Without knowing how the survey was conducted, it is impossible to assess whether or not this is the case.
A third problem with the argument is that it makes a hasty generalization about the types of issues workers are interested in. It accords with common sense that workers would be interested in corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, since these issues affect workers very directly. However, it is unfair to assume that workers would be similarly interested in other management issuesones that do not affect them or affect them less directly.
In conclusion, this argument is not convincing as it stands. To strengthen it, the author would have to show that the respondents account for a significant and representative portion of all workers. Additionally, the author must provide evidence of workers interest other management topicsnot just those that affect workers directly.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
江苏2012年下半年PETS考试准考证9月1日起打印
2015下半年上海公共英语考试成绩查询入口开通
北京2012年6月公共英语五级成绩单及证书领取
北京2014年上半年公共英语考试准考证打印时间
北京2013年上半年公共英语考试准考证打印时间
上海应用技术学院2015年3月PETS准考证领取通知
延边大学2015上半年英语等级考试PETS准考证领取
2015年安徽公共英语等级考试(PETS)成绩查询开始
辽东学院2015年3月公共英语等级考试准考证领取
2015下半年西藏公共英语考试成绩查询入口开通
2015年黑龙江公共英语等级考试(PETS)成绩查询开始
上海2015下半年全国英语等级考试成绩于11月4日开始
湖南2015下半年全国英语等级考试成绩查询入口开通
2015年山西公共英语等级考试(PETS)成绩查询开始
2016年公共英语考试准考证打印(领取)时间汇总
2015年5月公共英语五级成绩查询入口已开通
2015下半年宁夏公共英语考试成绩查询入口开通
2015年山东公共英语等级考试(PETS)成绩查询开始
北京2013下半年公共英语等级考试准考证打印时间
各地2016年公共英语(PETS 1-4)考试报名时间汇总
2015年江西公共英语等级考试(PETS)成绩查询开始
2015下半年新疆公共英语考试成绩查询入口开通
全国外语水平考试成绩单(证书)补办流程
2016年海南省公共英语五级考试(WSK)准考证打印时间
2015下半年济南公共英语考试成绩查询入口开通
厦门大学2016上半年公共英语考试准考证领取时间
各地2016年公共英语五级(WSK)准考证打印汇总
2015年江苏公共英语等级考试(PETS)成绩查询开始
2015上半年全国英语等级考试成绩查询入口已开通
2015下半年青海公共英语考试成绩查询入口开通
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |