题目:
The only responsibility of corporate executives, provided they stay within the law, is to make as much money as possible for their companies.
公司的经营者们唯一的责任就是在法律规定范围之内为他们的公司赚尽可能多的钱。
正文:
As long as staying within the law, is the corporate executives only responsibility is to maximize the profit for companies? I dont think so. Making money is a fundamental aim of the executives, and creating as much social benefits as possible is also their responsibility. Furthermore, only staying in the range of law is not enough.
In the first place, the corporate executives primary aim is earning as much profit as possible for the companies. The companies are built to earn money, without this aim,the modern society, which is pushing by the accumulation of capitals, would not develop in such a speed. The modern industry world is based on the value that making as much money as possible at lowest cost. Holding this value, the executives have to try their best to maximize profits of the corporations, otherwise, they will fail in the competitive business world. So in order to make corporate improving and keep the position of all the employees, the executives most important responsibility is to earn profits. Of course, it could also ensure their own good lives. Making more and more money, the lives of whole corporate workers will be better, the tax incomes of the nation will raise, the business market will be active, and the society will develop faster.Accordingly, making more economical benefits is the aim of the corporations, and the responsibility of executives.
However, although making profits is the primary purpose of executives, it does not equal to that making profits is the only goal. At the same time, making social benefits is also important for executives. Corporations money is not only gained by the efforts of the executives and employees, but also by the help of the whole society. Without the societys support, companies could not get so many benefits from it. Therefore, it is important for executives to return something to society. Take Bill Gates for example.Leading the biggest company of the world, Gates never forgets to create social benefits for the society. Up to now, he have donated more than 3 billion dollars to respond the worlds help. He help poor country deal with some serious diseases,support scientist to research on human bodies, fund the welfare of the nation, help improve the education, and donate to various kinds of charity groups. The rewards of such behaviors are obvious and enormous. The Microsoft may gain a better reputation,and the whole market condition may thrive in the long rung, either of which will defintely make sense for the lasting profits of Microsoft. Seeing all those mentioned above, it is clear that executives should help society to reach balanced improvement just as Gates did.
Besides the restrain of social responsibilities, the executives should also act within a range which is wider than laws. Law is merely the most basic limit of people; also,there is morality for individuals and groups to obey. As corporate executives, people should also keep a high level of morality, for they are the representatives of the companies, and the public person who noticed by ordinary people. So being honest,respect others, helping people as they could are all necessary regulations for executives. That could help the corporations and the society keep harmonious. In addition, laws are not always perfect. There are often some holes among them, since the laws could not react as soon as the newest changes of the world happen. For instance, the laws of the internet are not consummate yet, so there are a lot of behaviors which have not been regulated. And executives have the responsibility to keep away from those behaviors which could lead to unfair competing or damage to the society, even if they might bring corporations big economical benefits.
In conclusion, the economical and social benefits, which are significant factors for social development, both should be pursued by corporate executives. And those behaviors which are towards any purposes should within the limits of morality rather than basic laws.
FT社评 新兴经济体亟需结构改革
希腊“债务违约”进入倒计时
端午节习俗之佩戴香包
业绩不佳的管理者照样拿奖金
81岁英国女性亲授不老秘诀:永远不结婚
牛市催生中国私募基金繁荣
大象屎咖啡成为新时尚 每公斤售价1880美元
MERS不具持续“人际传播”能力
端午传说之白娘子喝雄黄酒现原形
马欣德拉 廉价并非印度制造唯一优势
富士康意欲印度制造苹果,正积极寻址
朋友圈热议人贩子死刑 在外国如何定罪?
Thomas Cook携手复星进军中国
澳大利亚电视台首次使用自拍杆进行资讯直播
金州勇士队赢得2015年NBA总冠军
揭秘中国端午节习俗大餐
台胞来往大陆将免签 适时实行卡式台胞证
女足世界杯:魅力持续升温
日本人气漫画《海贼王》发行量创吉尼斯纪录
端午习俗之饮雄黄酒
渐别世界工厂迈向“中国智造”
互联网让我们过度自信
安吉丽娜·朱莉·皮特:手术日记
意大利老师留另类暑假作业
俄中破译斯诺登文件致英国撤回一线特工
汉能经济危机谜团出现新波折
007超酷车型诞生?宝马7远程操控内置影院
2020年10美元纸币将首次出现女性头像
《时尚芭莎》前主编如何实现了巴黎梦
一张图告诉你:2100年的地球将有多热?
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |