Fifty years ago, Rachel Carson wrote and published Silent Spring. Carson was ahead of hertime. She said pesticides like DDT were damaging the environment and human health.Although the book became an inspiration for the environmental movement, the battle for theenvironment continues.
In the 1950s, the U.S. Department of Agriculture was spraying more than a quarter-millionkilograms of pesticides each year. Silent Spring, by Rachel Carson, revealed that pesticides likeDDT were lethal not only for insects but for all living things.
Silent Spring essentially told the reading public that human beings could alter the naturalworld in ways that were quite deadly and that it could be potentially lethal to human beings aswell as to other parts of the natural world, said Linda Lear, the author of a biography onCarson.
More than six million copies of the book have been sold in the U.S. Its been translated intosome 30 languages.
In the Washington suburbs, the house where Carson wrote Silent Spring is now a NationalHistoric Landmark. Carson was a pathbreaker.In Silent Spring, she is writing in a voice that Icall apocalyptic writing, added Linda Lear. She is trying to sound an alarm to get ourattention.
Thirty years after Silent Spring was published, public television, in its program The AmericanExperience, called the book one of the most important of our time.
But there were dissenters. Norman Borlaug, the 1970 Nobel Peace Prize winner, led thedefense of pesticides.Were having troubles now feeding this hungry world, said Borlaug. Ifyou remove DDT with the hysteria that is present in the USA, the U.S. will be importing food,only there wont be any place from where to import it. By 1972, DDT was banned foragricultural use in the U.S. But thousands of new chemicals were being developed. NFor years,the U.S. Senates Committee on the Environment has been trying to ban or control hundredsof chemicals from agricultural products and consumer goods. This committee heard from CDC officials who told us their scientists found 212 industrialchemicals, including six carcinogens, coursing through Americans bodies, said DemocraticSenator Frank Lautenberg. In 2006, the World Health Organization announced plans to useDDT again - indoors - in its campaign against malaria. Syngenta is a major producer ofagricultural chemicals. Like others in the industry, it says its chemicals are safe if used properly. We try to do every single study that is necessary to support the safety characteristics of theproduct. said Tim Pastoor, the companys principal scientist. Fifty years after Silent Spring,millions of kilograms of new pesticides and other chemicals are being sprayed across USfarmlands. And the environmental movement is still fighting back.
牛津实用英语语法:214 将来进行时与will +动词原形的比较
牛津实用英语语法:196 过去完成时在间接引语中的用法
牛津实用英语语法:174其他用法
牛津实用英语语法:条件句
牛津实用英语语法:194 过去完成时形式和用法
牛津实用英语语法:206 be going to 形式用于预测
牛津实用英语语法:208 第一人称will和shall
牛津实用英语语法:220 条件完成时
牛津实用英语语法:247 用to代表的不定式
牛津实用英语语法:212 将来进行时用做一般的进行时态
牛津实用英语语法:235 某些动词之后的that…should结构
牛津实用英语语法:201 will+动词原形表示做出决断时的意图
牛津实用英语语法:177用来叙述过去发生的事件
牛津实用英语语法:246 不带to的不定式
牛津实用英语语法:227 if和in case
牛津实用英语语法:209 一般将来时的用法
牛津实用英语语法:231 should/would think+that从句或so/not
牛津实用英语语法:162 used
牛津实用英语语法:218 从句时态的呼应
牛津实用英语语法:222 条件句类型2
牛津实用英语语法:232 would 表示过去的意图
牛津实用英语语法:189现在完成时和一般过去时
牛津实用英语语法:226 if,even if,whether,unless,but for,
牛津实用英语语法:234 shall用于第二、第三人称
牛津实用英语语法:217从句
牛津实用英语语法:will/would,shall/
牛津实用英语语法:192 现在完成时的一般式与进行式的比较
牛津实用英语语法:236 it is/was+形容词+ that… should结构
牛津实用英语语法:219 条件现在时
牛津实用英语语法:203 be going to形式
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |