Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and pollution. What extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think more effective?
Bad traffic and increasing pollution are thorny issues challenging every major city in the globe. To combat such problems, government encourages companies to mark up gas price in an effort to decrease car use and cut down waste gas. However it may temporarily alleviate the problem, but is doubtfully the optimal solution.
First of all, consumers and economy would be victimized by such measures. The number of cars in a country directly depends on the proportion of the population affluent enough to own cars. As a result, raises in gas price could invoke hard feelings among this segment of people but would not drastically change their behavior in using cars. Even if the number of cars on road is reduced due to higher gas cost, this is not the best way to solve traffic problems. Such policy would hurt the auto industry, place higher costs on current and prospect car owners, and undermine the economy of a nation. In the long run, the final way out could be the construction of better roads and more effective use of available transport facilities.
Secondly, there is evidence that waste gas from cars is not the leading cause of air pollution. The culprit may be the discharge of polluting substances into the atmosphere due to the rapidly growing manufacturing industry. As a result, reduction of the number of cars would not return us a blue sky and fresh air. We could better handle this problem if we could increase control over industrial waste discharge and adopt more environmental friendly materials and production equipment.
Finally, other measures like the application of cheaper and cleaner energy resources could also be a better solution. For example, we now have the ability to make cell-powered or even solar-powered cars. Such energy is completely clean and plentiful. However we still have a very long way to go to turn such technologically possible into affordable and practical products.
To conclude, it is not the best way to control traffic and pollution by increasing gas price because such action will hurt consumers and economy without achieving what it is aimed for. Measures such as construction of better transport facilities and development of new energy resources could be more effective solutions.
雅思听力背景:预约医生
雅思听力核心短语:A开头生活短语
名师点睛:雅思听力最实用的6个技巧
雅思听力评分中的字数要求
雅思听力技巧:克服“语音不全”才能拿高分
雅思听力高频场景词汇:学生生活
雅思听力答题的13条基本规律
雅思听力核心词汇:六类信号词
熟悉留学生活场景拿雅思听力高分
雅思听力背景材料:微生物
雅思听力核心词汇:数字
雅思听力背景材料:圣诞树的来历
雅思听力背景词汇:关键地名
盘点雅思听力真题中的动植物词汇
雅思听力各题型高分技巧
雅思听力常见场景词汇:学校生活
雅思听力高分技巧:两大信号词
雅思听力核心词汇总结:同义词(7)
雅思听力趣味背景:圣诞习俗(1)
雅思听力核心词汇总结:词形相近
雅思听力高分:“And”一点通
雅思听力银行场景考点点拨
雅思听力常见场景之选课
高分必备:细心成就雅思听力高分
雅思听力核心词汇总结:同义词(2)
雅思听力练习材料:章鱼“保罗”
雅思听力背景材料:Christmas in the UK
雅思听力趣味背景:圣诞习俗(2)
雅思听力小技巧:大写还是小写?
解析雅思听力选择题的词汇问题
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |