Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and pollution. What extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think more effective?
Bad traffic and increasing pollution are thorny issues challenging every major city in the globe. To combat such problems, government encourages companies to mark up gas price in an effort to decrease car use and cut down waste gas. However it may temporarily alleviate the problem, but is doubtfully the optimal solution.
First of all, consumers and economy would be victimized by such measures. The number of cars in a country directly depends on the proportion of the population affluent enough to own cars. As a result, raises in gas price could invoke hard feelings among this segment of people but would not drastically change their behavior in using cars. Even if the number of cars on road is reduced due to higher gas cost, this is not the best way to solve traffic problems. Such policy would hurt the auto industry, place higher costs on current and prospect car owners, and undermine the economy of a nation. In the long run, the final way out could be the construction of better roads and more effective use of available transport facilities.
Secondly, there is evidence that waste gas from cars is not the leading cause of air pollution. The culprit may be the discharge of polluting substances into the atmosphere due to the rapidly growing manufacturing industry. As a result, reduction of the number of cars would not return us a blue sky and fresh air. We could better handle this problem if we could increase control over industrial waste discharge and adopt more environmental friendly materials and production equipment.
Finally, other measures like the application of cheaper and cleaner energy resources could also be a better solution. For example, we now have the ability to make cell-powered or even solar-powered cars. Such energy is completely clean and plentiful. However we still have a very long way to go to turn such technologically possible into affordable and practical products.
To conclude, it is not the best way to control traffic and pollution by increasing gas price because such action will hurt consumers and economy without achieving what it is aimed for. Measures such as construction of better transport facilities and development of new energy resources could be more effective solutions.
高考英语听力训练应重视课下积累和考场技巧
2008年高考上海听力试题、答案、录音音频和原文
学会试题推断 高考英语听力训练要讲究策略
2009年广东省高考英语听力强化训练15--16套
2009年高考复习:英语听力提高六大关键
07年高考全国卷Ⅰ 英语听力下载
2009年广东省高考英语听力强化训练11--12套
高考英语听力突破四大瓶颈 全面巩固弱势
高考英语听力训练三部曲
【海南】2009年高考英语听力50%计入总分
2007年高考外语科目听力考试将延长半小时交卷
2008年高考湖北听力试题、答案、录音音频和原文
2008年高考北京听力试题、答案、录音音频和原文
备考指南:高考英语听力技巧
2009年广东省高考英语听力强化训练3--4套
2008年高考上海听力试题、答案、录音音频和原文
2008年高考体检:近视与听力下降是“软肋”
四川2009年高考英语取消听力,考生如何应对?
2008年高考全国卷听力试题、答案、录音音频和原文
考生关注:高考英语听力、口试如何考?
英语听力男声朗读人辞世 千万高考生都是听众
专家指导:2009年高考英语听力考试备考技巧
2009年广东省高考英语听力强化训练1--2套
高考英语听力制胜法宝五步曲
浙江:09年高考英语听力考试中旬起报名
高考英语听力训练应重视课下积累和考场技巧
2009年广东省高考英语听力强化训练19--20套
2009年广东省高考英语听力强化训练13--14套
名师解读高考英语:加强听力训练刻不容缓
高考听力特点及高分应试策略
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |