Missions to Mars: a rocky road to the Red Planet
Missions to Mars may have stalled, but the search for signsof life continues by analysing the DNA of Martian meteorites, writes Roger Highfield.
Are we alone in the cosmos? For centuries, that question has been purely speculative. But in recent years scientists have gathered evidence of alien life on Mars that is as tantalising as it is inconclusive.
We thought we might have a definitive answer in 2003, when Britains £50 million Beagle 2 probe was scheduled to touch down on the Red Planet, carrying an instrument that could have detected traces of living things. But we never heard from the little probe again.
The loss was a massive disappointment to the professor behind the mission, Colin Pillinger of the Open University. During the late Nineties, I had seen him doggedly enlist support for the project from fellow space scientists, the government and even the likes of Blur and the artist Damien Hirst.
The European Space Agency promised Prof Pillinger that there would be a follow-up programme, with a mission as soon as 2007. That date slipped back again and again. The Mars mission is now scheduled for 2018, when a joint mission with Nasa is due to send two rovers to search for life. Towards the end of this year, Nasa will launch the Mars Science Laboratory mission, which will set down a rover called Curiosity that will study whether conditions have ever been favourable for microbial life.
There is, however, another way to answer this giant question. In 1989, Prof Pillingers team found organic material, typical of that left by the remains of living things on Earth, in a meteorite called EETA79001. This is one of a relatively small number of rocks fewer than 100 that chemical analysis reveals must have been blasted off the surface of the Red Planet by an asteroid impact and then subsequently fallen to Earth.
The Open University team stopped short of saying they had discovered life on Mars but, in 1996, Everett Gibson and his colleagues at Nasa announced that they believed that they had discovered a fossil no bigger than a nanometre in another meteorite, known as ALH84001, which had fallen to Earth roughly 13,000 years ago. Other researchers, studying the data collected by Americas Viking landers, which touched down in 1976, concluded that life signs had been detected then, too.
Sceptics and there are many remain convinced that inorganic processes could have produced the same data and features that have been interpreted by some as signs of microbial life. But how can we even tell these rocks came from Mars?
Well, a few days ago, I found myself back at the Open University, to test another Martian meteorite, which we will offer as a prize to readers of New Scientist in the next issue. I bought it from Luc Labenne, a well-known collector based in France. It was a piece of a rock that crashed into the desert in Algeria, hence the designation NWA2975 .
One measure of its rarity is its astonishing value one 102g sample of the same rock is on sale for $100,000 . To ensure that it was genuine, I enlisted the help of Prof Pillingers colleagues. Andy Tindle studied a slide of NWA2975 provided by Ted Bunch of Northern Arizona University, a member of the team who originally described the meteorite in 2005. This revealed a mixture of rounded desert sand grains and various minerals of the kind found on Mars, such as pyroxene, which contains manganese and iron in a ratio typical of the Red Planet.
To make absolutely sure, Richard Greenwood and Jenny Gibson removed around ten-thousandths of a gram for further analysis. Using an instrument called a mass spectrometer , they studied the relative abundance in the meteorites silicate minerals of three isotopes of oxygen oxygen-16, oxygen-17 and oxygen-18. They were released for analysis with the help of a laser and a powerful reagent.
Because the relative abundance of these isotopes varies throughout the solar system, it is possible to use them like a DNA test in order to identify whether a meteorite comes from the Moon, an asteroid or Mars. In this case, they found a slight excess in the abundance of oxygen-17 and oxygen-18 compared with rocks from Earth, just as we would expect from a Martian rock.
What this tells us is that we dont have to go to Mars to get all kinds of insights into the Red Planet. We can reveal a lot simply by studying its meteorites to reveal data from the composition of the atmosphere to the presence of water. And, of course, these meteorites offer us a welcome opportunity to search for life signs, as we wait for the
next mission to land on the planets dusty, pink surface.
GRE逻辑阅读应注意单词后缀
GRE阅读:训练方式+5大要点解析
GRE阅读:类比思维解题方法
GRE阅读考试出题规律解析
赵津:GRE阅读备考经验分享(一)
GRE阅读方法技巧汇总(六)
得高分需学会分析新GRE阅读文章
GRE阅读高分策略
GRE阅读掌握特性是关键(2)
新GRE阅读题五大步骤详细解析
新GRE阅读练习选择题(20-27附答案)
GRE长阅读练习题:Mary Barton
GRE阅读主旨题题型解析
GRE阅读中的客观题备考技巧
GRE阅读定位技巧与思路解析
紧抓主题句 新GRE阅读得高分
GRE阅读高分方法:排除法
新gre阅读技巧 紧抓主题句
学会分析GRE阅读文章
GRE考试阅读猜词技巧
如何破解GRE快速阅读误区?
GRE阅读倒装句结构分析
GRE阅读考试长难句六大结构解析
GRE逻辑阅读考试指南说明
GRE阅读首段及各段首句最重点
新GRE阅读理解方法攻略
如何攻克GRE阅读生难学术词汇
卢杨:两G阅读在我这里都一样
GRE阅读长难句实例分析(10)
坚持住 GRE阅读难句训练
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |