BEIJING, March 24 -- History tells that trade wars are a losing game. No one benefits, and everyone ends up a bit bruised.
Despite the risk of triggering a trade war, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive memorandum that could result in heavy tariffs on up to 60-billion-U.S.-dollar imports from China as well as restrictions on Chinese investments.
The unilateral move is a bullying tactic long played by Washington in the face of trade disputes, which uses its superior economic status to force concessions from its partners.
The strategy isn't a wise one, especially in today's world where the economic and trade interests of all countries are intertwined. If a trade war breaks out, no one escapes unscathed.
Some say China benefits more in its trade with the United States, and therefore China would lose more in a trade war; others argue China stands to lose little given its status as the world's second largest economy.
Both arguments miss the mark for one simple reason: trade ties between the world's two largest economies are fundamentally reciprocal. Statistics from the U.S.-China Business Council show that the bilateral economic relationship supports roughly 2.6 million jobs in the United States across a range of industries, among which about 104,000 jobs were created by Chinese investment.
Today, American consumers enjoy low-priced products made in China, and Chinese businesses realize profits in the United States. The relationship is win-win.
The last thing Beijing wants is a trade war spoiling this positive dynamic. But should it happen, the Chinese economy is resilient enough to manage it.
After years of painful adjustment, the Chinese economy today is less dependent on foreign trade, and as the economy continues to expand while the country's debt growth slows, Beijing has a broader macro-economic policy space.
In the meantime, by deepening domestic reforms, promoting industry restructuring and diversifying its export markets, China is capable of turning a crisis into an opportunity for further economic progress.
For example, in Japan's trade war with the United States in the 1980s, Japanese industries were forced to lower their production costs and promote technological innovation. As a result, the country's exports resumed growth after a short period of stagnation. China could follow Japan's lead should a full-blown trade war occur.
Currently, the global economy is in the midst of a delicate recovery. Any protectionist or unilateral move -- such as the one taken by the Trump administration -- could stifle momentum and threaten a long-awaited return to growth.
Trade isn't a zero-sum game, something Washington ought to realize. If not, all parties will be dragged into the abyss of a conflict where no one emerges a winner.
2015考研英语阅读美国的企业管治
2015考研英语阅读身为人父的喜悦
2015考研英语阅读入侵物种繁衍与湮灭
2015考研英语阅读日本的手机游戏业
2015考研英语阅读硅谷知识产权之争
2015考研英语阅读拼拼凑凑见真相
2015考研英语阅读种族广告
2015考研英语阅读定制宠物
2015考研英语阅读简单的输血
2015考研英语阅读以整体思维设计欧洲债券
2015考研英语阅读现代红娘
2015考研英语阅读戛纳电影节
2015考研英语阅读解密达芬奇密码
2015考研英语阅读脸谱和那些13岁以下的孩子们
2015考研英语阅读比尔克林顿的忠告
2015考研英语阅读重塑皮拉马尔
2015考研英语阅读教授们的Facebook
2015考研英语阅读油价
2015考研英语阅读窃听风暴
2015考研英语阅读金色降落伞
2015考研英语阅读小行星探测
2015考研英语阅读索尼管理权重回日本人手里
2015考研英语阅读石油勘探
2015考研英语阅读为股票做广告
2015考研英语阅读合作关系的演变
2015考研英语阅读腹地美景
2015考研英语阅读听起来很美
2015考研英语阅读太阳能关税
2015考研英语阅读数字画
2015考研英语阅读衍生品清算
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |