BEIJING, March 24 -- History tells that trade wars are a losing game. No one benefits, and everyone ends up a bit bruised.
Despite the risk of triggering a trade war, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive memorandum that could result in heavy tariffs on up to 60-billion-U.S.-dollar imports from China as well as restrictions on Chinese investments.
The unilateral move is a bullying tactic long played by Washington in the face of trade disputes, which uses its superior economic status to force concessions from its partners.
The strategy isn't a wise one, especially in today's world where the economic and trade interests of all countries are intertwined. If a trade war breaks out, no one escapes unscathed.
Some say China benefits more in its trade with the United States, and therefore China would lose more in a trade war; others argue China stands to lose little given its status as the world's second largest economy.
Both arguments miss the mark for one simple reason: trade ties between the world's two largest economies are fundamentally reciprocal. Statistics from the U.S.-China Business Council show that the bilateral economic relationship supports roughly 2.6 million jobs in the United States across a range of industries, among which about 104,000 jobs were created by Chinese investment.
Today, American consumers enjoy low-priced products made in China, and Chinese businesses realize profits in the United States. The relationship is win-win.
The last thing Beijing wants is a trade war spoiling this positive dynamic. But should it happen, the Chinese economy is resilient enough to manage it.
After years of painful adjustment, the Chinese economy today is less dependent on foreign trade, and as the economy continues to expand while the country's debt growth slows, Beijing has a broader macro-economic policy space.
In the meantime, by deepening domestic reforms, promoting industry restructuring and diversifying its export markets, China is capable of turning a crisis into an opportunity for further economic progress.
For example, in Japan's trade war with the United States in the 1980s, Japanese industries were forced to lower their production costs and promote technological innovation. As a result, the country's exports resumed growth after a short period of stagnation. China could follow Japan's lead should a full-blown trade war occur.
Currently, the global economy is in the midst of a delicate recovery. Any protectionist or unilateral move -- such as the one taken by the Trump administration -- could stifle momentum and threaten a long-awaited return to growth.
Trade isn't a zero-sum game, something Washington ought to realize. If not, all parties will be dragged into the abyss of a conflict where no one emerges a winner.
SAT作文素材分享5:Spacewoman Stuck
10月份SAT考试作文题目
SAT写作素材分享:challenge authority
SAT写作常考话题分析
6月SAT写作真题
SAT写作素材话题分享:Competition
SAT作文批改实例讲解(五)
SAT作文评分标准与评分过程详解
SAT作文素材分享6:Professor Popsicle' Proves Cold No Barrier
SAT考试写作素材分享:Change
SAT写作素材分享:creativity/curiosity
SAT满分达人教你如何学英语
SAT作文谨慎使用模板
新版SAT官方指南写作范文一
SAT写作素材:The Critical Period
SAT考试作文写作素材:Conscience
SAT考试作文素材:The Roaring Twenties
SAT Essay作文练习话题汇总(一)
SAT写作高分作文的评分规则
1月SAT考试写作真题
SAT作文高分的秘密
SAT写作6分满分范文
1月SAT考试作文题目
5月SAT考试写作真题
12月SAT考试作文题目
SAT作文批改实例(二)
SAT考试作文写作素材:追求Pursuit
SAT写作例子Essay Sample
SAT作文修改实例(三)
SAT满分作文系列(四)
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |