BEIJING, March 24 -- History tells that trade wars are a losing game. No one benefits, and everyone ends up a bit bruised.
Despite the risk of triggering a trade war, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive memorandum that could result in heavy tariffs on up to 60-billion-U.S.-dollar imports from China as well as restrictions on Chinese investments.
The unilateral move is a bullying tactic long played by Washington in the face of trade disputes, which uses its superior economic status to force concessions from its partners.
The strategy isn't a wise one, especially in today's world where the economic and trade interests of all countries are intertwined. If a trade war breaks out, no one escapes unscathed.
Some say China benefits more in its trade with the United States, and therefore China would lose more in a trade war; others argue China stands to lose little given its status as the world's second largest economy.
Both arguments miss the mark for one simple reason: trade ties between the world's two largest economies are fundamentally reciprocal. Statistics from the U.S.-China Business Council show that the bilateral economic relationship supports roughly 2.6 million jobs in the United States across a range of industries, among which about 104,000 jobs were created by Chinese investment.
Today, American consumers enjoy low-priced products made in China, and Chinese businesses realize profits in the United States. The relationship is win-win.
The last thing Beijing wants is a trade war spoiling this positive dynamic. But should it happen, the Chinese economy is resilient enough to manage it.
After years of painful adjustment, the Chinese economy today is less dependent on foreign trade, and as the economy continues to expand while the country's debt growth slows, Beijing has a broader macro-economic policy space.
In the meantime, by deepening domestic reforms, promoting industry restructuring and diversifying its export markets, China is capable of turning a crisis into an opportunity for further economic progress.
For example, in Japan's trade war with the United States in the 1980s, Japanese industries were forced to lower their production costs and promote technological innovation. As a result, the country's exports resumed growth after a short period of stagnation. China could follow Japan's lead should a full-blown trade war occur.
Currently, the global economy is in the midst of a delicate recovery. Any protectionist or unilateral move -- such as the one taken by the Trump administration -- could stifle momentum and threaten a long-awaited return to growth.
Trade isn't a zero-sum game, something Washington ought to realize. If not, all parties will be dragged into the abyss of a conflict where no one emerges a winner.
12月大学英语六级阅读理解模拟练习(5)
正确选项和错误选项的特征
12月大学英语六级阅读经典长难句分析 22期
12月大学英语六级阅读经典长难句分析 8期
表演行业已趋向拥挤化
12月大学英语六级阅读理解模拟练习(1)
CET6英语阅读每日一练,附答案
12月大学英语六级阅读经典长难句分析 14期
12月大学英语六级阅读经典长难句分析 16期
英语六级阅读练习:灰尘背后的那些事儿03
12月大学英语六级阅读理解模拟练习(7)
世贸大楼遭袭后给人类留下的健康问题
12月大学英语六级阅读经典长难句分析 4期
12月大学英语六级阅读经典长难句分析 29期
12月大学英语六级阅读经典长难句分析 20期
12月大学英语六级阅读理解模拟练习(12)
12月大学英语六级阅读经典长难句分析 13期
12月大学英语六级阅读经典长难句分析 10期
12月大学英语六级阅读经典长难句分析 19期
12月大学英语六级阅读理解模拟练习(6)
12月大学英语六级阅读经典长难句分析 5期
12月大学英语六级阅读经典长难句分析 6期
12月大学英语六级阅读理解模拟练习(14)
12月大学英语六级阅读理解模拟练习(3)
12月大学英语六级阅读理解模拟练习(17)
12月大学英语六级阅读理解模拟练习(15)
12月大学英语六级阅读经典长难句分析 28期
12月大学英语六级阅读经典长难句分析 23期
12月大学英语六级阅读经典长难句分析 3期
12月大学英语六级阅读经典长难句分析 27期
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |