BEIJING, March 24 -- History tells that trade wars are a losing game. No one benefits, and everyone ends up a bit bruised.
Despite the risk of triggering a trade war, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive memorandum that could result in heavy tariffs on up to 60-billion-U.S.-dollar imports from China as well as restrictions on Chinese investments.
The unilateral move is a bullying tactic long played by Washington in the face of trade disputes, which uses its superior economic status to force concessions from its partners.
The strategy isn't a wise one, especially in today's world where the economic and trade interests of all countries are intertwined. If a trade war breaks out, no one escapes unscathed.
Some say China benefits more in its trade with the United States, and therefore China would lose more in a trade war; others argue China stands to lose little given its status as the world's second largest economy.
Both arguments miss the mark for one simple reason: trade ties between the world's two largest economies are fundamentally reciprocal. Statistics from the U.S.-China Business Council show that the bilateral economic relationship supports roughly 2.6 million jobs in the United States across a range of industries, among which about 104,000 jobs were created by Chinese investment.
Today, American consumers enjoy low-priced products made in China, and Chinese businesses realize profits in the United States. The relationship is win-win.
The last thing Beijing wants is a trade war spoiling this positive dynamic. But should it happen, the Chinese economy is resilient enough to manage it.
After years of painful adjustment, the Chinese economy today is less dependent on foreign trade, and as the economy continues to expand while the country's debt growth slows, Beijing has a broader macro-economic policy space.
In the meantime, by deepening domestic reforms, promoting industry restructuring and diversifying its export markets, China is capable of turning a crisis into an opportunity for further economic progress.
For example, in Japan's trade war with the United States in the 1980s, Japanese industries were forced to lower their production costs and promote technological innovation. As a result, the country's exports resumed growth after a short period of stagnation. China could follow Japan's lead should a full-blown trade war occur.
Currently, the global economy is in the midst of a delicate recovery. Any protectionist or unilateral move -- such as the one taken by the Trump administration -- could stifle momentum and threaten a long-awaited return to growth.
Trade isn't a zero-sum game, something Washington ought to realize. If not, all parties will be dragged into the abyss of a conflict where no one emerges a winner.
2009中考英语词汇表 系列S
初中英语 词缀记忆法
词汇笔记 五种词汇的学习方法 超强
初中英语常用词组3 量词词组
从奥巴马演讲词看英语写作词汇的应用
2009中考英语词汇短语集锦 (1)
2009中考英语词汇表 系列R
09年中考英语总复习经典习题讲解3一冠词
2009中考英语词汇表 系列O
09年中考英语总复习经典习题讲解5一代词
2010年中考英语词汇旧词新义:blind
中考英语词汇--“美味水果”大聚会
2010年中考英语词汇旧词新义:deal
2009中考英语词汇表 系列M
初中英语常用词组2 介词短语词组
初中英语常用词组复习1
2010年中考英语词汇旧词新义:cost
高中英语词汇:80后“A到Z”生存法则
2010年中考英语词汇旧词新义:clean
常用英语词语辨析105组(2)
英乐时空Here I Am
09年英语短语集中联想记忆110条
2009中考英语词汇短语集锦 (2)
2009中考英语词汇表 系列JKL
2009中考英语词汇表 系列W
常用英语词语辨析105组(5)
中考英语词汇“for短语”全攻略
2009中考英语词汇表 系列H
张惠妹《排山倒海》英文版
常用英语词语辨析105组(3)
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |