SAN FRANCISCO, Aug. 13 -- San Francisco and Santa Clara counties in the Bay Area on Tuesday filed a joint lawsuit against the U.S. government's new immigration policy that makes it more difficult for immigrants to obtain residency in the United States.
San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera and Santa Clara County Counsel James Williams filed the lawsuit to challenge the new rule introduced by President Donald Trump's administration and announced by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security on "inadmissibility on public charge grounds."
The federal government disclosed on Monday a change to the "public charge" rule that would allow immigration officials to label any immigrant who receives public benefits, such as housing assistance, health care or food assistance, at any time in the future as a public charge, which would deny them pathway to citizenship or permanent residence in the country.
"This illegal rule is yet another attempt to vilify immigrants," Herrera said. "It makes it easier to unfairly target hard-working, lawful immigrants while sowing fear and confusion in our communities."
He said the new rule would have San Francisco and Santa Clara residents bear the consequences of this "misguided policy," which will shift millions of U.S. dollars in health care costs onto the taxpayers of the two counties.
"The Trump administration's new rule is an unlawful, foolish attack on immigrant communities," said Williams.
"It will hurt all members of our communities by reducing access to critical health and safety-net services that create healthier communities for all of our residents," he said.
San Francisco Mayor London Breed said Tuesday "this lawsuit is about protecting our residents and standing up against a policy that will have devastating effects on the well-being of many San Franciscans."
She vowed to fight against "any and all efforts to divide us, because by targeting our diverse communities, the federal administration is attacking a fundamental aspect of who we are as a city."
Breed slammed the rule as a "bad policy" that will create more homelessness and hunger-struck children.
"It is specifically designed to harm immigrants, who pay billions of dollars in taxes, in order to push a political agenda of divisiveness and intolerance. It is inhumane, and we are taking action to stop it," she added.
逃生必备“紧急救生包”
“书呆子解释”你听得懂吗?
“冷火鸡”真的就是冷火鸡吗?
告白最坏结果:“踢出朋友圈”
词源探究:salary一词竟然来源于salt
“懒人行动主义”你支持吗?
伴随群聊的“小窗口私聊”英文怎么说?
这些东西都有了新说法
社交媒体“过度分享狂”
什么是“宣言珠宝”?
掩饰秃顶的发型用英文怎么表达?
APEC假期“洗肺游”受热捧
阅后即焚的“快照族”
什么是“大规模分散注意力武器”?
同性恋都有“感应雷达”
你是“高智商控”吗?
一进办公室就得“隔间昏迷症”
“穿帮镜头”英语怎么说
社交网上的“生活直播”
各类比赛中的“德比大战”到底指什么?
“难以言说”之物
流量为王?微信有了“刷阅族”
你会选择“女儿职业道路”吗
你身边有“非妈族”吗?
奥巴马陷“拿铁敬礼”门
拿手机当道具的“演戏式通话”
社交媒体上的“情侣自拍”秀
“埃博拉恐慌”蔓延
收到快递后打不开时的“包装怒”
你也想要个“宠物男”?
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |