Two separate series of incidents that happened in recent months have had the effect of shocking the nation.
The first was the string of 11 successive suicides by employees of the Shenzhen-based technology firm Foxconn since the beginning of this year. The latest tragedy happened as this writer was working on the column yesterday. The other, six fatal attacks on kindergarten kids and students in various provinces across the country over two months.
The public, understandably, was shocked by the loss of so many lives in such a short period of time. Yet, they were more puzzled at the weird recurrence of such tragedies. Why did such incidents take place despite widespread vigilance and preventive measures undertaken after the first few cases?
Some sociologists and psychologists attributed the phenomenon to psychological stress and mental problems suffered by the attackers as well as those who took their own lives. The experts even cited the Werther effect - copycat acts taking place following widely publicized similar cases.
Such theories are not groundless. In a certain sense, they are quite to the point. Yet, psychological or mental problems are definitely not the root cause of the tragedies. These problems have other deeper causes.
Some insightful critics pointed out that acute social conflicts - widening income gaps between the rich minority and lower and middle-income majority, worsening unemployment, rampant corruption, infringement of the public's interests and rights by the more powerful members of society, and so on - were to blame for such tragedies.
However, we do not seem to be alert enough to the gravity of the problem, or understand to how large an extent these social conflicts have affected these troubled individuals.
We should realize that social injustice may have reached a critical, or inflection point before such large-scale incidents were triggered. The Foxconn suicides and stabbings of schoolchildren are signals indicating this deeper malaise.
Though such incidents may not be all directly linked to specific cases of social injustice, one has to admit that the unfavorable social environment has caused some people to lose hope. These people may be more psychologically fragile than ordinary citizens but they probably would not have resorted to such desperate acts if society had been more fair and harmonious.
The frequency with which such cases of violence are occurring in recent years also indicates that, while we have strived to achieve miraculous economic growth, we have in the process failed to show simultaneous care to creating social justice.
The central government leadership has apparently taken note of the problem. At a press conference held during this year's session of the National People's Congress in March, Premier Wen Jiabao said: "China is in a stage of fast economic development. It is also a time when various kinds of contradictions become more prominent (than before). There are many reasons for these contradictions, of which a major one is the violation of laws in certain localities to infringe upon the public's interests."
The authorities have not only realized the seriousness of the problem of social injustice but also seem to have begun addressing the problem.
At the beginning of this year, the authorities announced, through the NPC meetings and the People's Daily newspaper that decisions would be taken to streamline national income distribution and raise the percentage of residents' income in the total national income and the share of remuneration for labor in primary distribution.
A second major move is the recent decision by the Supreme People's Court (SPC) to sort out petitions with regard to administrative litigations and correct wrongs in administrative litigation verdicts.
These two decisions are significant in the effort to resolve social conflicts and develop social harmony.
While the former tries to increase the common man's income, the latter tries to guarantee the public's right to seek justice in cases of conflict with those in power.
If implemented earnestly, the two undertakings will greatly alleviate public grievances and strengthen "social stability".
The key to the success of the two decisions lies in "implementation". The public, however, seem to be wary of these promises, as many such "decisions" or pledges have not borne fruit.
Hopefully, the public will not be let down once again.
雅思听力填空题怎样看题目的预测词性
用爱去感化考官:雅思口语考题技巧
雅思口语考试三个常见又让人头疼话题
名师指导制定雅思学习计划 学习英语思维
考生必看11年7月11日雅思写作真题解析
四招王牌升级最新雅思口语发音测试
高手破解雅思听力七大“花招”指南
雅思听力配对题特点以及技巧解析
雅思听力“三级跳”法帮考生识别答案
名师指导雅思听力之数字全攻略
名师解析:今年雅思听力单选题出题特点
雅思机经听力篇“千日养兵”和“试兵突击”
雅思写作丰富的句子类型取决于语法的包装
对症下药:“七宗罪” 影响雅思听力
两大法则攻克语法绊脚石稳拿雅思高分
专家指导雅思口语如何构建框架
雅思听力中出现频率最高同意转换
名师解读:雅思听力的“读”和“猜”
绝招高效积累才是雅思词汇的秘籍
雅思听力提高须建立在词汇与语法基础上
雅思写作名师解读:放弃模板重视评分标准
雅思口语话题详解:A Change in Life
雅思口语常考话题详解:Leader
名家支招雅思考试,中国式英语考出好成绩
11年7至10月份雅思考试听力的预测
14个拿下雅思阅读7分的必备王牌法则
雅思口语话题详解:Bike
名师指导:6月雅思考试口语预测
雅思口语常考题详解:influenced
提高雅思写作能力的有效途径研习范文
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |