Violence this week in Libya, Egypt and Yemen has once again brought to the fore inherent tensions between free speech, however offensive, and religious dignity. Some political analysts in Cairo invoke the dictum that the remedy for such speech is more speech.
The attacks on US missions in Libya, Egypt and Yemen highlight how easily passions against the nominal ally of those countries can be ignited. An obscure, crudely-made American video mocking the Prophet Muhammed triggered rage and murder.
“This is the price of extremism. If those who made the film wanted an extremist reaction, they got it. They succeeded,” said Said Sadek, a professor of Political Sociology at the American University in Cairo.
Sadek argues extremists on both sides got what they wanted: for one, proof that Islam is violent, for the other, that America is the enemy of their religion - points scored at the expense of those in the middle, including slain US ambassador Chris Stevens.
“The majority of people, Muslims and Christians, are not extremists but they're captives of those extremists on both sides. Each side is provoking something and then the others are responding and they try to push the silent majority into extremism and suspicion and intolerance,” Sadek said.
Sadek says it's an anti-Western political agenda easy to deploy.
“There is a misunderstanding in Muslim countries [about] the relationship between government and media," he said. "They still believe it's like in autocratic regimes: the government orders the media to do this or to do that. President Obama did not order that movie about Islam is made. In fact, he is being accused in America that he is pro-Muslim.”
Libya's government was clear in its condemnation of the Benghazi attack. Egypt's initial response made no direct mention of the death of Ambassador Stevens, although a day later it rejected the``unlawful acts'' against foreign embassies.
“I don't think that the government has enough political capital to actually counter that vision. They cannot state that 'Well, okay, there's an offensive movie but it's not that important and it does not represent the U.S. administration and it's a matter of free speech.' They could never say that,” said Ziad Akl Moussa, a political analyst in Cairo.
It's a dynamic that has played out several times in recent years, with Danish cartoons of the prophet and other western images deemed insulting provoking bursts of outrage.
“It's a contention over putting creativity on a pedestal in the West and actually putting a red line behind it in the East. It doesn't mean that this is wrong and this is right, it simply means that it's different. But we never addressed that,” Moussa said.
He argues until governments frame the question as one of freedom of expression, not a fight over religion, such violence “will happen again and again.”
political capital: 政治资本
“相亲”从娃娃抓起?
狗仔升级版-“黑客狗仔”
名句改编“雪克隆” Snowclone
流动的美食:巴士餐厅 Bustaurant
如何在工作中实现自我满足感
你被“软瘾”困扰了吗?
“百万富翁”新说法
那些“母亲”演化的词
你关注的“热门话题”是什么?
现在流行“裸辞”?
什么是“僵尸债务人”?
隔离尘世的black
你“隐性饥饿”了吗?
阿尔法老婆 vs 花瓶老婆
“药驾”也危险
你是“防御性悲观主义者”吗?
你是“自愿工作狂”吗?
你有诺丁山情结吗?
横扫各国的“中国购物狂”
魅力超男 ubersexual
面试过程中,如何巧妙回答薪资历史问题
新时代的4D男人
实时“地理定位” geolocation
商界里的“打开和服”
不容忽视的“她力量”
你是idle car owner捧车族吗?
少女猎手 Manther
韩国的“卷帘门男人”
你的“快乐物质比”是多少?
同堂假期 Greycation
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |