The common view in social science of love relationships is not that opposites attract but that like attracts like. People fall in Jove with others who share their interests and whose personalities are similar. Hill, Rubin, and Peplau found only slight support for this view. On a great many characteristics, couples were not alike. On others, couples were only somewhat alike. Couples did tend to be about the same age, to be equally good looking, to have similar IQ scores, to be of the same religion, and to want the same number of children. But on each of these things, quite a few couples differed from one another. In fact, on only one question did most agree: on whether they were in love .
The early interviews failed to find that being alike was very important in bringing couples together. The follow-up interviews found that similarities were much more important in keeping couples together. Those who were together after two years were much more closely matched than couples who broke up, especially in terms of age, IQ, college plans, and looks. Thus, couples were much more likely to break up if one person was a lot smarter, better looking, or older. It is easy to imagine why these differences would matter. If one person is much smarter or more mature than the other, this could cause conflicts. If one person is much better looking, he or she will have more chances for other relationships.
Yet other things that would seem as important turned out not to matter. Those who stayed together differed not at all from those who broke up in how alike they were on religion, sex role ideas, beliefs about sex, idealism, or the number of children they wanted. Surely, one might suppose that marked difference in sex role attitudes could cause friction or that religious differences might lead to breakups. But there was no evidence of this.
In fact, conflict was not one of the main reasons people gave for breaking up. Most said they broke up because they got bored with the other person. Often this caused one of the pair to become interested in someone else, thus prompting the split. Perhaps surprisingly, the woman got involved with someone else far more often than the man. Also, women were much more likely to suggest a breakup than men, regardless of the grounds. However, people were more likely to remain friends after the breakup if the man asked for the split. This suggests that the man is more sensitive to rejection.
26. The subject of article is_______.
A. dating couples B. similarities within couples
C. dating selections of college men D. patterns in marriage and divorce
27. The view that like attracts like _______.
A. was proved false B. received slight support
C. was definitely proved D. is unpopular in social science
28. One similarity that seemed important to the success of a relationship was__
A. religion B. number of children wanted
C. sex roles D. physical attractiveness
29. The main reason for breakups was_______.
A. conflict B. boredom
C. family pressure D. money problems
30. The article implies that_______.
A. less attractive people are more faithful
B. good-looking people have troublesome problems
C. money is more important than looks for men
D. all of the above are true
26. A 27. B 28. D 29. B 30. A
雅思阅读图表题解 答方法
闲话雅思阅读之 “潜规则”
雅思考试阅读解析对策:
雅思考试阅读部分技巧: 判断与猜测词义
雅思阅读满分怎么考 ?
一位外国父亲教的人生信条 (双语)
高中生必须掌握 的雅思阅读考试四大技能
雅思指导: 把握文章脉络在阅读中的作用
雅思辅导: 雅思阅读问与答
雅思考试阅读的基本 技能及方法
雅思阅读指导 :把握文章脉络在阅读中的作用
首考雅思阅读9分心得 :平时培养阅读速度
雅思考试阅读策略:攻心为上、 战略为辅
攻克雅 思阅读要注意五点
雅思阅读长句难句 分析练习
《盗梦空间》 经典台词中英对照
雅思阅读: 词汇量之外的四大重点
雅思阅读模拟篇章 How to increase sales
回炉烤鸭二次雅思考试攻略: 从阅读下手
雅思高分心得: 平时阅读速度要注意培养
漫话雅思阅读文章结构: 自然科学篇
雅思阅读准备宇宙探索 之超级地球
如何自学雅思阅读
雅思阅读秘笈: 结构阅读法
雅思阅读 是非判断题的方向性解题原则
雅思阅读:备考中 最需注意的四个问题
雅思阅读基本功 难句倒装句型
阅读背景:生活中的颜 色的不同涵义
温故知新: 雅思学术类阅读旧题重现统计
一战9分经验谈 :拼的是英语实力
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |