The common view in social science of love relationships is not that opposites attract but that like attracts like. People fall in Jove with others who share their interests and whose personalities are similar. Hill, Rubin, and Peplau found only slight support for this view. On a great many characteristics, couples were not alike. On others, couples were only somewhat alike. Couples did tend to be about the same age, to be equally good looking, to have similar IQ scores, to be of the same religion, and to want the same number of children. But on each of these things, quite a few couples differed from one another. In fact, on only one question did most agree: on whether they were in love .
The early interviews failed to find that being alike was very important in bringing couples together. The follow-up interviews found that similarities were much more important in keeping couples together. Those who were together after two years were much more closely matched than couples who broke up, especially in terms of age, IQ, college plans, and looks. Thus, couples were much more likely to break up if one person was a lot smarter, better looking, or older. It is easy to imagine why these differences would matter. If one person is much smarter or more mature than the other, this could cause conflicts. If one person is much better looking, he or she will have more chances for other relationships.
Yet other things that would seem as important turned out not to matter. Those who stayed together differed not at all from those who broke up in how alike they were on religion, sex role ideas, beliefs about sex, idealism, or the number of children they wanted. Surely, one might suppose that marked difference in sex role attitudes could cause friction or that religious differences might lead to breakups. But there was no evidence of this.
In fact, conflict was not one of the main reasons people gave for breaking up. Most said they broke up because they got bored with the other person. Often this caused one of the pair to become interested in someone else, thus prompting the split. Perhaps surprisingly, the woman got involved with someone else far more often than the man. Also, women were much more likely to suggest a breakup than men, regardless of the grounds. However, people were more likely to remain friends after the breakup if the man asked for the split. This suggests that the man is more sensitive to rejection.
26. The subject of article is_______.
A. dating couples B. similarities within couples
C. dating selections of college men D. patterns in marriage and divorce
27. The view that like attracts like _______.
A. was proved false B. received slight support
C. was definitely proved D. is unpopular in social science
28. One similarity that seemed important to the success of a relationship was__
A. religion B. number of children wanted
C. sex roles D. physical attractiveness
29. The main reason for breakups was_______.
A. conflict B. boredom
C. family pressure D. money problems
30. The article implies that_______.
A. less attractive people are more faithful
B. good-looking people have troublesome problems
C. money is more important than looks for men
D. all of the above are true
26. A 27. B 28. D 29. B 30. A
07—08年广东高考英语读写任务的真题
高考英语作文技巧:如何写好读写任务的文章
2008年高考的英语作文
五大高考名师预测高考英语作文4有关“跨文化”的话题
高考英语任务型的写作集训(4)
高考英语作文的专项训练:任务型写作训练(9)
高考英语作文常用开头用语
2009年高考辽宁卷的英语作文
广东高考英语新题型读写任务写作答题的指导
高考英语作文的专项训练:任务型写作训练(5)
09年高考英语作文题目的预测
经典英语写作的资料:高考英语作文万能模板
有关友谊的英语作文高考英语作文的范文
高考英语任务型写作的集训(5)
高考英语作文:端午节的由来以及风俗
五大高考名师预测高考英语作文 6“教育、校园类”的话题
高考英语写作:怎么迎合评卷老师的胃口四步曲
高考英语一箭双雕的法则:提高阅读带动写作
几种典型的英语作文开头引述的方法
五大高考名师预测高考英语作文 2“诚实、诚信”的话题
2009年安徽高考英语新题型的专练:任务型读写
2008年高考江苏卷的英语作文
2009年高考英语作文是给心理辅导老师写信
高考英语任务型的写作集训(3)
高考英语作文专项训练:任务型的写作训练(3)
2008年高考辽宁卷的英语作文
高考英语作文的模版
高考英语任务型写作的集训(6)
高中英语的日记:五一劳动节
高考英语阅卷的人眼中一类文的关键——凝练
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |