The common view in social science of love relationships is not that opposites attract but that like attracts like. People fall in Jove with others who share their interests and whose personalities are similar. Hill, Rubin, and Peplau found only slight support for this view. On a great many characteristics, couples were not alike. On others, couples were only somewhat alike. Couples did tend to be about the same age, to be equally good looking, to have similar IQ scores, to be of the same religion, and to want the same number of children. But on each of these things, quite a few couples differed from one another. In fact, on only one question did most agree: on whether they were in love .
The early interviews failed to find that being alike was very important in bringing couples together. The follow-up interviews found that similarities were much more important in keeping couples together. Those who were together after two years were much more closely matched than couples who broke up, especially in terms of age, IQ, college plans, and looks. Thus, couples were much more likely to break up if one person was a lot smarter, better looking, or older. It is easy to imagine why these differences would matter. If one person is much smarter or more mature than the other, this could cause conflicts. If one person is much better looking, he or she will have more chances for other relationships.
Yet other things that would seem as important turned out not to matter. Those who stayed together differed not at all from those who broke up in how alike they were on religion, sex role ideas, beliefs about sex, idealism, or the number of children they wanted. Surely, one might suppose that marked difference in sex role attitudes could cause friction or that religious differences might lead to breakups. But there was no evidence of this.
In fact, conflict was not one of the main reasons people gave for breaking up. Most said they broke up because they got bored with the other person. Often this caused one of the pair to become interested in someone else, thus prompting the split. Perhaps surprisingly, the woman got involved with someone else far more often than the man. Also, women were much more likely to suggest a breakup than men, regardless of the grounds. However, people were more likely to remain friends after the breakup if the man asked for the split. This suggests that the man is more sensitive to rejection.
26. The subject of article is_______.
A. dating couples B. similarities within couples
C. dating selections of college men D. patterns in marriage and divorce
27. The view that like attracts like _______.
A. was proved false B. received slight support
C. was definitely proved D. is unpopular in social science
28. One similarity that seemed important to the success of a relationship was__
A. religion B. number of children wanted
C. sex roles D. physical attractiveness
29. The main reason for breakups was_______.
A. conflict B. boredom
C. family pressure D. money problems
30. The article implies that_______.
A. less attractive people are more faithful
B. good-looking people have troublesome problems
C. money is more important than looks for men
D. all of the above are true
答案:
26. A 27. B 28. D 29. B 30. A
黄金泡沫破碎 金价大跌
爬楼梯还是坐电梯
冥冥之中很玄乎 迷信并非一无是处
Treasure Every Minute 珍惜每一分钟
南非总统祖马就前总统曼德拉去世发表全国讲话
EQ很重要:14个信号证明你的情商高
法国通过法案 嫖客初犯罚1500欧元
求职面试时你需要留心的14件事
阿里巴巴28亿港元投资海尔
大概9点36分拍:派对拍照黄金时间
如何让自己成为不可或缺的人才?
曼德拉“世纪葬礼”在即 南非当局压力大
南非前总统曼德拉逝世 享年95岁
宠物可视电话:主人出门在外照样交流
寒潮来袭美国多地降雪降温 加州4人被“冻死”
美面包师建成世界最大姜饼屋 打破吉尼斯纪录
底特律破产:汽车城破产背后的原因
35000英尺上的飞机用餐攻坚战
梦想经不起等待 今天起就行动吧!
卡梅伦答中国网友:帮催《神探夏洛克》更新
南非国父曼德拉去世 全球政要表示哀悼
如果这些事没发生过就好了
人手一个的奢侈品手袋还能算奢侈品吗?
冬日时尚健康保暖热饮大推荐
外语拟退出统一高考 高考英语改革引热议
李彦宏成中国首富 身价122亿美元
Good Qualitiess of a Neighbor 一个好邻居应有的素质
医患关系暧昧 怎样避免误诊
外媒看中国:中国多地遭遇严重雾霾天气
生活需要运气:10招让你变得更幸运
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |