Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
参考答案:AABDB
2011年实用口语练习:静观其变
口语情景对话:走遍美国精选 做游戏ACT 3 - 2
疯狂口语要素精选 7
口语情景对话:走遍美国精选 偷得浮生半日闲ACT 3 - 1
奥运会实用英语口语200句:这是一个非常受人欢迎的目的地
新东方英语口语开口篇:描述外貌(3)
地道口语:职场必备的五个简单句子
实用口语:关于兔子的英语口语
英语流行语:你跟谁“合得来”?
实用口语:英语口语要素精选 18
2011年实用口语练习:一起来找“茶”
新东方英语口语开口篇:打招呼(3)
新东方英语口语开口篇:询问称呼(2)
实用口语:选举 Elections
实用盘点:赞美他人时必备口语
实用英语:如何用英语砍价
实用口语情景轻松学:说一说旅行要准备的东西
疯狂口语要素精选 13
英语口语主题:交际英语热门话题47个(21--生日派对)
新东方英语口语开口篇:Age 年龄(4)
口语情景对话:一个真正的斯图尔特家的后代ACT 1 - 3
实用口语情景轻松学:你能借我点儿钱吗?
大学新生常用口语:熟悉校园和同学
2011年实用口语练习:歉意怎么说出口(2)
地道口语:用21句表达沮丧
口语:“血肉之躯”用英语怎么说?
实用口语情景轻松学:你最喜欢哪个季节?
学会用英文的感叹句
地道口语:如何用英语聊电影
老外“精神不好”时会说些什么
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |