Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
参考答案:AABDB
百万张奥运门票发放全国中小学
英国全民打赌:谁为准王妃凯特做嫁衣
北京安检可能减少奥运乐趣
奥运前夕中国加紧空气治理
双语:天桥骄子主持客串绯闻女孩第四季
双语:研究称人类无法分辨男女
欧盟报告称立陶宛为“谋杀之都”
奥运给北京树起新地标
漂亮妈妈多生女 美男渐成稀缺品
双语:新型电脑芯片可让电脑提速20倍
郎平率美国女排出征北京奥运
美国人视角:享受奥运,向中国学习
威廉准新娘订婚白裙网上火热拍卖
谷歌街景拍到有人街头生孩子 旁边医院毫不知情
北京奥运村迎来首批“村民”
荷兰新推宠物狗啤酒 主人可与狗共饮
民众提前45小时排队买奥运门票
孩子开销大怎么办?
北京奥运机动车限行措施昨日启动
双语:七旬 “女巫” 被活活烧死
360度看伦敦 世界最清晰全景图出炉
英皇后人选引热议 卡梅伦力挺卡米拉
资讯热词:“绩效工资”怎么说?
网通电信宣布:台湾地震受损电缆恢复运作
奥运电影经典台词11句
双语:“气球”带我空中翱翔
罗格北京奥运会开幕式致辞全文
北京奥运 贵宾云集
研究发现:人类大脑无法判断对方性别
双语:七旬老妇成世界最年长母亲
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |