Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
参考答案:AABDB
揭秘太阳的“雀斑”——黑子
烟花的盛开,并非都为喜事
腐国人民的酒吧时间
一场没有孩子的旅行
80后是“无忧”的一代?
回忆里美妙的门廊生活
寿司的起源故事
法式传奇美味:牛角面包
就算月亮破了,爸爸也能补
英美文化:美国的公共汽车
重新站起来,再试一次
人体的健康晴雨表:指甲
有志者事竟成If you Think You can, You can
日常情景对话:医院探病
家乡花园尽头的宝藏
情景对话:订婚
玩俄罗斯方块有助忘记痛苦?
我们生活在一个“包装”出来的时代
传递爱,让爱再生爱
团队精神=忘记“小我”
趣话金融:有毒资产Toxic Debts & Toxic Assets
调查显示,仍有三成成年人需抱着玩偶入睡
神秘的死亡之谷风帆石
我的人生信条之锱铢必较
静电:干燥季节里的“爆炸剂”
真正的爱,是未必说得出口的爱
在我当后妈的日子里
日常情景对话:关于时间
美国的餐厅文化你知道多少
一千颗玻璃弹珠的故事
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |