Passage Three
Why the inductive and mathematical sciences, after their first rapid development at the culmination of Greek civilization, advanced so slowly for two thousand yearsand why in the following two hundred years a knowledge of natural and mathematical science has accumulated, which so vastly exceeds all that was previously known that these sciences may be justly regarded as the products of our own timesare questions which have interested the modern philosopher not less than the objects with which these sciences are more immediately conversant. Was it the employment of a new method of research, or in the exercise of greater virtue in the use of the old methods, that this singular modern phenomenon had its origin? Was the long period one of arrested development, and is the modern era one of normal growth? Or should we ascribe the characteristics of both periods to so-called historical accidentsto the influence of conjunctions in circumstances of which no explanation is possible, save in the omnipotence and wisdom of a guiding Providence?
The explanation which has become commonplace, that the ancients employed deduction chiefly in their scientific inquiries, while the moderns employ induction, proves to be too narrow, and fails upon close examination to point with sufficient distinctness the contrast that is evident between ancient and modern scientific doctrines and inquiries. For all knowledge is founded on observation, and proceeds from this by analysis, by synthesis and analysis, by induction and deduction, and if possible by verification, or by new appeals to observation under the guidance of deductionby steps which are indeed correlative parts of one method; and the ancient sciences afford examples of every one of these methods, or parts of one method, which have been generalized from the examples of science.
A failure to employ or to employ adequately any one of these partial methods, an imperfection in the arts and resources of observation and experiment, carelessness in observation, neglect of relevant facts, by appeal to experiment and observationthese are the faults which cause all failures to ascertain truth, whether among the ancients or the moderns; but this statement does not explain why the modern is possessed of a greater virtue, and by what means he attained his superiority. Much less does it explain the sudden growth of science in recent times.
The attempt to discover the explanation of this phenomenon in the antithesis of facts and theories or facts and ideasin the neglect among the ancients of the former, and their too exclusive attention to the latterproves also to be too narrow, as well as open to the charge of vagueness. For in the first place, the antithesis is not complete. Facts and theories are not coordinate species. Theories, if true, are factsa particular class of facts indeed, generally complex, and if a logical connection subsists between their constituents, have all the positive attributes of theories.
Nevertheless, this distinction, however inadequate it may be to explain the source of true method in science, is well founded, and connotes an important character in true method. A fact is a proposition of simple. A theory, on the other hand, if true has all the characteristics of a fact, except that its verification is possible only by indirect, remote, and difficult means. To convert theories into facts is to add simple verification, and the theory thus acquires the full characteristics of a fact.
1. The title that best expresses the ideas of this passage is
[A]. Philosophy of mathematics. [B]. The Recent Growth in Science.
[C]. The Verification of Facts. [C]. Methods of Scientific Inquiry.
2. According to the author, one possible reason for the growth of science during the days of the ancient Greeks and in modern times is
[A]. the similarity between the two periods.
[B]. that it was an act of God.
[C]. that both tried to develop the inductive method.
[D]. due to the decline of the deductive method.
3. The difference between fact and theory
[A]. is that the latter needs confirmation.
[B]. rests on the simplicity of the former.
[C]. is the difference between the modern scientists and the ancient Greeks.
[D]. helps us to understand the deductive method.
4. According to the author, mathematics is
[A]. an inductive science. [B]. in need of simple verification.
[C]. a deductive science. [D]. based on fact and theory.
5. The statement Theories are facts may be called.
[A]. a metaphor. [B]. a paradox.
[C]. an appraisal of the inductive and deductive methods.
[D]. a pun.
Vocabulary
1. inductive 归纳法
induction n.归纳法
2. deductive 演绎法
deduction n。演绎法
3. culmination 到达顶/极点
4. conversant 熟悉的,精通的
5. exercise 运用,实行,执行仪式
singular 卓越的,非凡的,独一无二的
6. conjunction 结合,同时发生
7. omnipotence 全能,无限权/威力
8. Providence (大写)指上帝,天道,天令
9. commonplace 平凡的,陈腐的
10. inquiry 调查,探究(真理,知识等)
11. doctrine 教义,学说,讲义
12. correlative 相互关联的
13. antithesis 对立面,对偶(修辞学中),对句
14. coordinate 同等的,并列的
15. subsist 生存,维持生活
16. attribute 特征,属性
17. connote 意味着,含蓄(指词内涵)
彩票大奖得主亲述:我中大奖后的人生
第四季还没播,就直接预订第五季,这部高分剧真的值得一看
20条最离谱的辞职理由
伦敦奥运奥委会整治官员黄牛党出奇招
纪念计算机科学之父艾伦•图灵100周年诞辰
美国人亚洲择邻居 只为孩子学中文
纽约时报推出中文版网站:期望挺进中国市场
觉得时间不够用?科学家称时间最终将完全停止
睡眠达人不告诉你的三个秘密
世界十大个性建筑盘点
美国交友新招“闻睡衣 找朋友”
巴西监狱:读一本书减四天刑
英男子脚踩两只船 生下12个娃没露馅
帮助母鸡孵蛋的猫咪
调查:美国婴儿潮一代将不留遗产
法师网上走红 不料成微博红人
微软推出自主操系统平板电脑 Surface by Microsoft
睡不着又睡不好?19招教你迅速入睡
艾玛开了个求助热线,帮助职场女性免受骚扰
马斯克的胶囊高铁要来中国
长寿金鱼存活24年 四岁小男孩如今已28
英国9岁小女孩吐槽学校午餐走红
英国最小企业家:6岁女孩开3家糖果店
欧盟:年假期间生病可补休
澳父亲50箱啤酒换儿子一份工作
体育到商场?从体育赛场看商场竞争
三分之二亚洲人实际上自认更富有
成功人士都有的11个好习惯
上班带饭族须知:如何吃的实惠又健康
微软传言可能推出平板电脑
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |