You dont have to look very far to find out why the official reactions to medical findings have been so lukewarm. The answer is simply money. Tobacco is a wonderful commodity to tax. Its almost like a tax on our daily bread. In tax revenue alone, the government of Britain collects enough from smokers to pay for its entire educational facilities. So while the authorities point out ever so discreetly that smoking may, conceivable, be harmful, it doesnt do to shout too loudly about it.
This is surely the most short-sighted policy you could imagine. While money is eagerly collected in vast sums with one hand, it is paid out in increasingly vaster sums with the other. Enormous amounts are spent on cancer research and on efforts to cure people suffering from the disease. Countless valuable lives are lost. In the long run, there is no doubt that everybody would be much better-off if smoking were banned altogether.
Of course, we are not ready for such a drastic action. But if the governments of the world were honestly concerned about the welfare of their peoples, youd think theyd conduct aggressive anti-smoking campaigns. Far from it! The tobacco industry is allowed to spend staggering sums on advertising. Its advertising is as insidious as it is dishonest. We are never shown pictures of real smokers coughing up their lungs early in the morning. That would never do. The advertisement always depict virile, clean-shaven young men. They suggest it is manly to smoke, even positively healthy! Smoking is associated with the great open-air life, with beautiful girls, true love and togetherness. What utter nonsense!
For a start, governments could begin by banning all cigarette and tobacco advertising and should then conduct anti-smoking advertising campaigns of their own. Smoking should be banned in all public places like theatres, cinemas and restaurants. Great efforts should be made to inform young people especially of the dire consequences of taking up the habit. A horrific warning say, a picture of a deaths head should be included in every packet of cigarettes that is sold. As individuals, we are certainly weak, but if governments acted honestly and courageously, they could protect us from ourselves.
1. Why do a few governments take timid measures toward smoking?
[A] because they are afraid of people.
[B] Because diseases cost a lot.
[C] Because they are afraid of the cutting down of their revenue.
[D] Because they are afraid of manufacturers.
2. The tone of this passage is
[A] critical.
[B] ironical.
[C] distaste.
[D] amusing.
3. What does the sentence because you are in good company mean?
[A] you are backed by the government.
[B] You are not alone.
[C] You have good colleagues.
[D] Governments are blind to evils of smoking too.
4. What is the best title of this passage?
[A] World Governments should conduct serious campaigns against smoking.
[B] World governments take timid measures against smoking.
[C] smoking is the most important source of income to many countries.
[D] tobacco industry spends a large sum of money on medical research.
MH370机长无异常行为
盘点全国政协委员两会提案
中外最强毒舌: 该不该买苹果表
钟南山:中国治霾十年可见成效
第72届金球奖完整获奖名单[1]
国际英语资讯:UK to impose 14-day quarantine on new arrivals as COVID-19 deaths hit 36,393
马凯:严重腐败现象是山西省的毒瘤
惊呆了:迷你猪长成了庞然大物
出国旅游季:盘点各个国家的免费福利[1]
又到旅游季:给你推荐带上旅途的10本书(组图)[1]
2017两会代表精彩语录之五
2017两会代表精彩语录之三
全国人大关于涉港决定(草案)的说明来了
新疆确有人越境参加IS
神秘食物:让男人长出令女人着迷的长长眼睫毛
2017两会代表精彩语录之八
2017年时装新趋势[1]
朱莉获封全球最受尊敬女性
新晋洗脑神曲PPAP,你听过了吗?
2017两会代表精彩语录之七
2017两会代表精彩语录之二
美国2游客罗马斗兽场刻字被抓
盘点:中国十大突出壮举[1]
英文名可透露你的职业?
委员:莫让“神翻译”逍遥“法”外[1]
英国单亲家庭比例高居西欧之首
盘点口味奇特的日本零食[1]
美国漫威之父斯坦•李将把猴王拍成电影
2017两会代表精彩语录之十
习近平:自然生态与政治生态两手抓
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |