1 Computers have been taught to play not only checkers, but also championship chess, which is a fairly accurate yardstick for measuring the computers progress in the ability to learn from experience.
2 Because the game requires logical reasoning, chess would seem to be perfectly suited to the computer .all a programmer has to do is give the computer a program evaluating the consequences of every possible response to every possible move, and the computer will win every time. In theory this is a sensible approach; in practice it is impossible. Today, a powerful computer can analyze 40 000 moves a second. That is an impressive speed. But there are an astronomical number of possible moves in chessliterally trillions. Even if such a program were written , there is no computer capable of holding that much data.
3 Therefore, if the computer is to compete at championship levels, it must be programmed to function with less than complete data. It must be able to learn from experience, to modify its own programm, to deal with a relatively unstructured situationin a word, to think for itself . In fact, this can be done. Chess-playing computers have yet to defeat world champion chess players, but several have beaten human players of only slightly lower ranks. The computers have had programs to carry them through the early, mechanical stages of their chess games. But they have gone on from there to reason and learn, and sometimes to win the game.
4 There are other proofs that computers can be programmed to learn, but this example is sufficient to demonstrate the point. Granted , winning a game of chess is not an earthshaking event even when a computer does it . But there are many serious human problems which ban be fruitfully approached as games. The Defense Department uses computers to play war games and work out strategies for dealing with international tensions. Other problemsinternational and interpersonal relations , ecology and economics , and the ever-increasing threat of world faminecan perhaps be solved by the joint efforts of human beings and truly intelligent computers .
Notes
1. check:a game played on a checkerboard by two players ,each using 12 pieces
2. ecology:the relationship between organisms and their environment 生态关系,生态学
SAT和托福的阅读对比
超级详细的SAT阅读笔记
SAT阅读题中表述态度的词汇总
SAT阅读备考中的五大难点
SAT阅读考试结构与测试技能
SAT阅读填空部分逻辑关系解读
SAT长阅读形式及答题原则介绍
SAT结构化阅读方法 攻克阅读难题不是梦
SAT阅读 词汇是突破的重点
处理SAT填空题要多加留意中心结构词
SAT阅读"读不懂"的原因是什么
如何构建SAT阅读思维攻克难题
SAT阅读 题目中常见的修辞手段(2)
攻克长篇SAT考试文章的阅读方法
备考SAT阅读需要克服的四大坏习惯
SAT阅读实例 Machine learning
SAT阅读提分之多看外国名著
SAT阅读:你必须掌握的文学术语
SAT阅读中常出现的句式汇总
备考SAT阅读的3个步骤
SAT阅读考试内容及题型介绍
分析SAT阅读文章特点
巧用“略读”搞定SAT阅读长段落
SAT阅读技巧双篇对比文章
SAT阅读破解生词的方法
SAT阅读速度慢的原因及提高办法
SAT阅读 题目中常见的修辞手段(1)
SAT阅读考试的记分规则
SAT填空题最大的考察点单词
SAT阅读素材:Machine learning
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |