President Clintons decision on Apr.8 to send Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji packing without an agreement on Chinas entry into the World Trade Organization seemed to be a massive miscalculation. The President took a drubbing from much of the press, which had breathlessly reported that a deal was in the bag. The Cabinet and Whit House still appeared divided, and business leaders were characterized as furious over the lost opportunity. Zhu charged that Clinton lacked the courage to reach an accord. And when Clinton later telephoned the angry Zhu to pledge a renewed effort at negotiations, the gesture was widely portrayed as a flip-flop.
In fact, Clinton made the right decision in holding out for a better WTO deal. A lot more horse trading is needed before a final agreement can be reached. And without the Administrations goal of a bullet-proof agreement that business lobbyists can enthusiastically sell to a Republican Congress, the whole process will end up in partisan acrimony that could harm relations with China for years.
THE HARD PART. Many business lobbyists, while disappointed that the deal was not closed, agree that better terms can still be had. And Treasury Secretary Robert E. Rubin, National Economic Council Director Gene B. Sperling, Commerce Secretary William M. Daley, and top trade negotiator Charlene Barshefsky all advised Clinton that while the Chinese had made a remarkable number of concessions, were not there yet, according to senior officials.
Negotiating with Zhu over the remaining issues may be the easy part. Although Clinton can signal U.S. approval for Chinas entry into the WTO himself, he needs Congress to grant Beijing permanent most-favored-nation status as part of a broad trade accord. And the temptation for meddling on Capital Hill may prove over-whelming. Zhu had barely landed before Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott declared himself skeptical that China deserved entry into the WTO. And Senators Jesse A. Helms and Emest F. Hollings promised to introduce a bill requiring congressional approval of any deal.
The hidden message from these three textile-state Southerners: Get more protection for the U. S. clothing industry. Hoping to smooth the way, the Administration tried, but failed, to budge Zhu on textiles. Also left in the lurch: Wall Street, Hollywood, and Detroit. Zhu refused to open up much of the lucrative Chinese securities market and insisted on cultural restrictions on American movies and music. He also blocked efforts to allow U. S. auto makers to provide fleet financing.
BIG JOB. Already, business lobbyists are blanketing Capitol Hill to presale any eventual agreement, but what theyve heard so far isnt encouraging. Republicans, including Lott, say that the time just isnt right for the deal. Translation: Were determined to make it look as if Clinton has capitulated to the Chinese and is ignoring human, religious, and labor rights violations; the theft of nuclear-weapons technology; and the sale of missile parts to Americas enemies. Beijings fierce critics within the Democratic Party, such as Senator Paul D. Wellstone of Minnesota and House Minority leader Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri, wont help, either.
Just how tough the lobbying job on Capitol Hill will be become clear on Apr. 20, when Rubin lectured 19chief executives on the need to discipline their Republican allies. With business and the White House still trading charges over who is responsible for the defeat of fast-track trade negotiating legislation in 1997, working together wont be easy. And Republicanswith a winksay that theyll eventually embrace Chinas entry into the WTO as a favor to Corporate America. Though not long before they torture Clinton. But Zhu is out on a limb, and if Congress overdoes the criticism, he may be forced by domestic critics to renege. Business must make this much dear to both its GOP allies and the Whit House: This historic deal is too important to risk losing to any more partisan squabbling
1. The main idea of this passage is
. The Contradiction between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party.
. On Chinas entry into WTO.
. Clinton was right.
. Business Lobbyists Control Capitol Hill.
2. What does the sentence Also left in the lurch: Wall Street, Hollywood, Detroit convey?
. Premier Zhu rejected their requirements.
. The three places overdid criticism.
. They wanted more protection.
. They are in trouble.
3. What was the attitude of the Republican Party toward Chinas entry into the WTO?
. Contradictory. .Appreciative.
. Disapproving. . Detestful.
4. Who plays the leading part in the deal in America?
. White House . . Republicans.
. The Democratic Party. . Businessmen.
5. It can be inferred from the passage that
. America will make concessions.
. America will hold out for a better WTO
. Clinton has the right to signal U. S. approval for Chinas entry.
. Democratic party approve Chinas entry into the WTO.
英语六级考试主编推荐:
2012年英语六级考试网络辅导精品全程班优惠中
更多推荐:
2012年英语六级考试阅读理解预测试题及答案汇总
2012年英语六级考试快速阅读技巧指导汇总
2012年大学英语六级考试阅读理解关键句汇总
2012年大学英语六级考试阅读理解答题策略
英语六级考试QQ交流群:124714182、154181147
共2页: 下一页
答案祥解
1. C. 总统是对的。这篇文章摘自Business Weekly. 文章是从商人的角度来看待中国加入WTO,他们希望从谈判中获得更多的利益,而克林顿的同意不同意的目的和他们相符争取更多利益。这篇就是从四方利益最终趋向一致同意中国加入世贸来证明总统结论正确的中心思想。
第一段指出Clinton由打发朱总理回国,不同意中国入世到一百八十度大转弯,在电话中愤怒的朱总理表示再次努力协商。内阁和白宫官员意见分歧,商人对失去机会火冒三丈。
第二段点出克林顿故意拖延以谋取更多的利益的决定是正确的文章的主旨句。商人院外活动集团成员要以政府完美无缺的协议的目标来说服共和党赞成/接受。以免整个过程以党争而告终。
第三,四段是商业方面的高级官员的代表纷纷却说Clinton当中国作出许多优惠让步时,美国不在那里。(意:美国吃亏了现在不要再吃亏了。)克林顿有权签署赞成中国加入世贸组织,可他需要国会批准北京永久性最惠国作为扩大贸易协定的组成部分。再说对国会的干预的诱惑力相当大:就在朱踏上美国本土时,参议院多数派领袖Trent Lott宣布他对中国是该不该入世持怀疑态度,而参议院Tesse A Helms 承诺提出一项要求国会批准任何交易的提案。
第五段讲了朱总理的强硬立场。第六段又是共和党的反对声,使民主党内站在北京以便的批评家也无能为力。
最后一段指出:尽管困难重重,这一历史事件太重要了,不能因党争而冒失失去机会的危险。
A. 民主党和共和党的矛盾。两党之争见上文译注,最终还是一致。 B. 论中国加入世贸组织。文章不是论中国加入而是论美国环绕中国入世贸的种种。 D. 商人院外活动集团成员控制国会。这在第五段中提到商人院外活动集团成员阻挠美国国会事先接受最终协议,但不是主题思想。
2. A. 朱总理拒绝了他们的要求。见难句译注9。
B. 这三个地方批评过头。 C. 他们要求更多的保护。 D. 他们陷入困境。
3. A. 矛盾。共和党一开始就反对。什么对中国该不该加入世贸组织持怀疑态度。第六段说得更露骨,时间不对。意思是他们想把整个事件看起来好象克林顿屈从于中国,忽视了中国违反人权,宗教权,劳动权,偷窃核武器技术,把导弹组成部件买给美国的敌人等事实。最后一段共和党一下子又所他们最终将会接受中国加入世贸组织以表示对整体美国的好感。不管是商人院外活动集团的作用,还是明确指出重开谈判的重要性。这一历史事件太重要绝不能因党争而失去机会。共和党纵然心中不愿,也不得不接受现实。心情是矛盾的。
B. 赞赏。 C. 不赞成。 D. 厌恶。
4. D. 商界。第一段中就点出:商界领袖对失去这次机会火冒三丈。第二段中提到商界院外活动成员要以实实在在的协议来说服共和党国会,免得以党争告终。第三段明确指出:许多商界院外人士一方面对协议未签定表示失望,另方面又同意,还会更好的条件。各种和商界直接关系的高级官员对克林顿劝说。
第五段:纺织,金融股票,汽车以至电影等都是商界的要求。朱总理拒绝的就是商界要求。
第六段提及商界院外活动的成员制止国会事先接受最终协定。
最后一段又是商界使共和党联盟和白宫懂得此事的重要性。
5. A. 美国将会作出让步,见上面注释。商人是绝对不会放弃中国市场的。
B. 美国会故意拖延以求取得更好的条件。这一点恐怕不会,见上文注释。朱总理的强硬立场,商人的见解。 C. 克林顿有签署批准中国入世之权。 D. 民主党赞成中国加入世贸,这两项都是事实
SAT阅读考试特点三个
SAT阅读填空题答题技巧五个
SAT阅读完成句子题答题方法
SAT阅读词汇应用技巧之辨析易混词汇
突破SAT填空题的常用技巧
SAT阅读备考要根据考试特点
SAT阅读方法三个
SAT阅读词汇的记忆原则
SAT阅读技巧之利用介词解题
SAT阅读填空题真题两道
SAT阅读长难句分析4例
如何解答SAT阅读填空题两空型?
SAT阅读答题的规律
两大SAT阅读题型解题方法
SAT阅读答题方法5点
SAT和托福阅读考试的对比
SAT阅读填空高分备考指南
SAT阅读解题技巧之概述题
SAT阅读技巧(记叙文)
SAT阅读填空题常见易混词汇20个
SAT填空题高分攻略
SAT阅读练习题之CDs
SAT阅读填空题练习题5道
SAT阅读考试策略三个
SAT阅读技巧之细节定位题
提高SAT阅读成绩需要抓住主题
SAT阅读高分经验
SAT阅读准备过程一览
SAT阅读判断题型答题方法
SAT阅读常见重要词汇
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |