Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
参考答案:
1-5 AABDB
2015考研英语阅读一级方程式赛车
2015考研英语阅读微软和PC行业
2015考研英语阅读金融技术公司
2015考研英语阅读自食其药
2015考研英语阅读非洲大陆掀起消费潮
2015考研英语阅读自由交易巨人
2015考研英语阅读反垄断和航空公司
2015考研英语阅读新兴市场的跨国公司
2015考研英语阅读动物如何感知时间
2015考研英语阅读睡眠与月相
2015考研英语阅读叙利亚偏离正轨
2015考研英语阅全球房价
2015考研英语阅读中国的资产管理公司
2015考研英语阅读审美和金钱
2015考研英语阅读大灭绝
2015考研英语阅读私募股权融资
2015考研英语阅读更安静的交通
2015考研英语阅读意大利时尚
2015考研英语阅读中国的利率
2015考研英语阅读土耳其的宗教
2015考研英语阅读德国商业银行
2015考研英语阅读微博
2015考研英语阅读癌症遗传学
2015考研英语阅读医药公司和癌症
2015考研英语阅读英做自己的愤怒的小鸟
2015考研英语阅读掘金超级富豪
2015考研英语阅读日本的消费税
2015考研英语阅读Facebook对你没好处
2015考研英语阅读全球健康
2015考研英语阅读打折心理学
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |