Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
参考答案:
1-5 AABDB
美国人视角:享受奥运,向中国学习
英国全民打赌:谁为准王妃凯特做嫁衣
捷克男主持效仿Lady Gaga穿鲜肉装
网通电信宣布:台湾地震受损电缆恢复运作
奥运前夕中国加紧空气治理
英皇后人选引热议 卡梅伦力挺卡米拉
百万张奥运门票发放全国中小学
玛丽亚凯莉带孕大秀59美元平价钻戒
纳达尔进入奥运状态
欧盟报告称立陶宛为“谋杀之都”
奥运给北京树起新地标
漂亮妈妈多生女 美男渐成稀缺品
北京奥运村迎来首批“村民”
双语:天桥骄子主持客串绯闻女孩第四季
大小贾斯汀共享“恋爱秘籍”:冷静承诺
NASA首次发现土星卫星中含有氧气
双语欣赏:温总理诗作《仰望星空》
北京奥运主题歌《我和你》传递温暖
双语:未来“台湾塔”
奥运金牌:快乐和忧愁天注定?
诗词英译:沉醉东风-秋日湘阴道中
北京安检可能减少奥运乐趣
高价蓝光影碟超清晰画质纯属骗人?
双语:《绝望主妇》第七季被爆有新主妇加入
北京奥运 贵宾云集
郎平率美国女排出征北京奥运
牛津字典收录微博词汇 网络用语受宠
走马观花看美国:体验世界过山车之最
北京奥运闭幕式:贝克汉姆“领衔”伦敦8分钟
奥运双语八卦:中国羽坛的夫妻档
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |