Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
参考答案:
1-5 AABDB
雅思阅读:Choices题型攻略小总结
如何发现雅思阅读中的信号 词
雅思阅读制胜关键,巧记词汇做“有米之炊 ”
胡敏:给“蜗居”“蚁族” 一代的箴言
雅思阅读考试题型展望
雅思阅读 Summary (Part 2 )
雅思阅读关键 :掌握英语同义词
突破雅思阅读考试的 关键
雅思阅读单选题如何 做对
实例讲解雅思阅读单选题如何 做对
雅思阅读七大高分 法则
雅思阅读泛读中雅思词汇的 心有灵犀
四大绝招助考生稳拿雅思阅读 高分
雅思阅读:浅析同义转换在中的重要性
浅谈雅思阅读哪一 篇更难
跨过雅思阅读障碍: 解析生词种类做到对症下药
雅思阅读多项选择题变化 多端
雅思阅读:趋势分析及备考方法
雅思阅读怎样对付文中的生词 的问题
雅思阅读真题类似文章 :蚂蚁智力
雅思阅读文章 (航海日志与气候)解析及答案
雅思阅读疑难杂症 巧应对
边玩边学、提高雅思阅读能力 (上)
雅思阅读判断题NOTGIVEN 全攻略
雅思阅读长难句
雅思阅读技巧 利用构词法猜测词义
雅思阅读围绕题型怎样备考
超实用 !雅思阅读全面应对法
雅思阅读考试真题词汇收集——摩斯电码
雅思阅读:泛读中雅思词汇的心有灵犀
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |