考研英语报刊文章阅读及剖析(7)
Behind the brewing war over protecting patients records in an age of HMOs and online medicine.
Technology is a two-edged sword. Rarely is this as clear as it is in the realm of health care. Technology allows doctors to test their patients for genetic defects--and then to turn around and spread the results throughout the world via the Internet. For someone in need of treatment, that s good news. But for someone in search of a job or an insurance policy, the tidings can be all bad.
Last week President Bill Clinton proposed a corollary to the patients bill of rights now before Congress: a right to medical privacy. Beginning in 2002, under rules set to become law in February, patients would be able to stipulate the conditions under which their personal medical data could be divulged. They would be able to examine their records and make corrections. They could learn who else had seen the information. Improper use of records by a caregiver or insurer could result in both civil and criminal penalties. The plan was, said Clinton, an unprecedented step toward putting Americans back in control of their own medical records.
While the administration billed the rules as an attempt to strike a balance between the needs of consumers and those of the health-care industry, neither doctors nor insurance companies were happy. The doctors said the rules could actually erode privacy, pointing to a provision allowing managed-care plans to use personal information without consent if the purpose was health-care operations. That, physicians said, was a loophole through which HMOs and other insurers could pry into the doctor-patient relationship, in the name of assessing the quality of care. Meanwhile, the insurers protested that the rules would make them vulnerable to lawsuits. They were especially disturbed by a provision holding them liable for privacy breaches by business partners such as lawyers and accountants. Both groups agreed that privacy protections would drive up the cost of health care by at least an additional $3.8 billion, and maybe much more, over the next five years. They also complained about the increased level of federal scrutiny required by the new rules enforcement provisions.
One aim of the rules is to reassure patients about confidentiality, thereby encouraging them to be open with their doctors. Today various cancers and sexually transmitted diseases can go untreated because patients are afraid of embarrassment or of losing insurance coverage. The fear is real: Clinton aides noted that a January poll by Princeton Survey Research Associates found that one in six U.S. adults had at some time done something unusual to conceal medical information, such as paying cash for services.
By EVAN THOMAS Newsweek; 11/08/99, Vol. 134 Issue 19, p67, 1/2p, 1c
1. The author begins his article with technology is a two-edged sword to _____________.
[A] show that doctors improper use of technology can end up in bad results
[B] call on peoples attention to the potential danger technology can bring to us
[C] warn of the harm patients are prone to suffer
[D] show the advantages and disadvantages of technology
2. According to the proposal made by President Clinton, patients will be able to do the following EXCEPT _____________.
[A] enjoy more rights to their medical records
[B] be open with their doctors
[C] decide how to use their medical information
[D] sue their insurers for improper use of their medical records
3. Doctors tend to think that the rules _____________.
[A] may ruin doctor-patient relationship
[B] can do more harm than good
[C] will prevent doctors from doing medical research
[D] will end up in more health care cost and poorer medical service
4. The example of the January poll by Princeton Survey Research Associates is used to show that __________________.
[A] American patients concealment of their medical information has become a big concern
[B] a large portion of patients would rather leave their diseases untreated
[C] concealing medical information is widespread in the U.S.
[D] paying cash for medical service is a common practice among American patients
5. From the article we can learn that ________________.
[A] American government will tighten its control over the use of patients personal information.
[B] doctors and insurers are both against the rules for the same reasons
[C] patients are entitled to have complete control of their medical information
[D] the new rules put insurers in a very disadvantageous position
答案:A B B A D
词汇注释
brewing adj. 酝酿中的;逐渐形成的;即将发生的
HMO: Health Maintenance Organization 医疗保健机构
tidings n. 消息
corollary n. 必然的结果;推论
stipulate v. 规定,保证
divulge v. 泄露, 暴露
bill v. 宣布,宣告
managed-care plan: n. 管理式医疗保健计划
loophole n. 漏洞
pry v. 探查,侦查,窥探
provision n. 规定
liable adj. 有责任的
breach n. 违背;不履行
难句突破
1.The doctors said the rules could actually erode privacy, pointing to a provision allowing managed-care plans to use personal information without consent if the purpose was health-care operations.
主体句式:The doctors said
结构分析:本句中pointing to 这个作伴随状语的分词短语又包含了一个介词without引出的方式状语和由if引导的条件状语从句,使得句子的结构变得较为复杂。
句子译文:医生认为这些法规实际上是在破坏隐私权,因为其中一条规定允许管理式医疗保健计划在开展医疗保健工作时可以不经许可使用个人信息。
妹妹患癌 姐姐替她生下宝宝
逗比小萝莉:不想让弟弟长大哭晕
美国石油大王婚变,巨额财产如何分割?
土拨鼠太胖卡在洞里 俄罗斯夫妇路过相救
房祖名、柯震东更多吸毒细节曝光
2017年艾美奖《绝命毒师》成最大赢家
女大学生现身说法三种危险情况如何自我防范
研究:婚礼越盛大 婚姻越幸福
纽约发型师行善 免费为穷人理发
纳尼?Hello Kitty 原型居然不是猫
MH370残骸位置锁定印度洋58处地点
美国两名埃博拉病人康复出院
朋友借钱忘了还?3招帮你巧妙化解
17种讨人厌微博朋友圈 你中了几箭
天才or吃货?宝宝出生三天会抓奶瓶
你会辞掉高薪工作去追求理想吗
职场潜规则 工作中你该如何道歉
泰坦尼克号沉没原因新解 气候异常
加州出奇招吸引赴美旅游的中国游客
警惕社交媒体的10个不良影响
德艺术家沙滩埋30金条 英国民众掀起寻金热
未来器官移植靠什么 3D打印部件愈加成熟
埃博拉疫情防控:“肥皂桶挑战”
剑桥大学禁养狗 院长指狗为猫
世卫组织建议对电子烟双重监管
阿里巴巴云计算有多强大?
招聘人员不会告诉你的十件事
美通缉犯参加冰桶挑战 暴露行踪被抓
麦当劳正失去对年轻人的吸引力
喵星人的一小步:Hello Kitty被日本科学家送入太空
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |