In recent years, railroads have been combining with each other, merging into super systems, causing heightened concerns about monopoly. As recently as 1995, the top four railroads accounted for under 70 percent of the total ton-miles moved by rails. Next year, after a series of mergers is completed, just four railroads will control well over 90 percent of all the freight moved by major rail carriers.
Supporters of the new super systems argue that these mergers will allow for substantial cost reductions and better coordinated service. Any threat of monopoly, they argue, is removed by fierce competition from trucks. But many shippers complain that for heavy bulk commodities traveling long distances, such as coal, chemicals, and grain, trucking is too costly and the railroads therefore have them by the throat.
The vast consolidation within the rail industry means that most shippers are served by only one rail company. Railroads typically charge such captive shippers 20 to 30 percent more than they do when another railroad is competing for the business. Shippers who feel they are being overcharged have the right to appeal to the federal governments Surface Transportation Board for rate relief, but the process is expensive, time-consuming, and will work only in truly extreme cases.
Railroads justify rate discrimination against captive shippers on the grounds that in the long run it reduces everyones cost. If railroads charged all customers the same average rate, they argue, shippers who have the option of switching to trucks or other forms of transportation would do so, leaving remaining customers to shoulder the cost of keeping up the line. Its a theory to which many economists subscribe, but in practice it often leaves railroads in the position of determining which companies will flourish and which will fail. Do we really want railroads to be the arbiters of who wins and who loses in the marketplace? asks Martin Bercovici, a Washington lawyer who frequently represents shipper.
Many captive shippers also worry they will soon be hit with a round of huge rate increases. The railroad industry as a whole, despite its brightening fortunes, still does not earn enough to cover the cost of the capital it must invest to keep up with its surging traffic. Yet railroads continue to borrow billions to acquire one another, with Wall Street cheering them on. Consider the $10.2 billion bid by Norfolk Southern and CSX to acquire Conrail this year. Conrails net railway operating income in 1996 was just $427 million, less than half of the carrying costs of the transaction. Whos going to pay for the rest of the bill? Many captive shippers fear that they will, as Norfolk Southern and CSX increase their grip on the market.
实例解析雅思听力选择题中的比较考点
雅思听力的六个高分策略分享
雅思听力笔记能用到的字母缩写词
拿下雅思听力高分需要先克服的三个问题
雅思听力选择题的审题方法介绍
打造雅思听力高分的三个细节讲解
雅思听力答案拼写的注意事项
八大雅思听力场景词汇整理
雅思听力出题原则简介
解读雅思听力中的基本数字考点
五个雅思听力的提高要点解读
雅思听力备考的立体复习法介绍
雅思听力常用替换原则介绍
雅思听力多选题的特点及解题思路指导
雅思听力考试时需要当心的5类陷阱
雅思听力备考的6个建议
拿下雅思听力高分的三招
雅思听力的三个常见失分点介绍
雅思听力备考初期的常见问题及解决方法
实例解析雅思听力考试中的条件词陷阱
解读雅思听力的两种常见衔接手段
24条雅思听力备考建议分享
解读雅思听力机经使用的四个阶段
雅思听力词汇的记忆备考方法
雅思听力的九个常见问题分享
突破雅思听力满分的五点经验分享
实例解析四种雅思听力关键词后置情况
雅思听力中长段子的精听方法介绍
快速提高 雅思听力魔鬼训练法
雅思听力Section 1常考场景分析
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |