To paraphrase 18th-century statesman Edmund Burke, all that is needed for the triumph of a misguided cause is that good people do nothing. One such cause now seeks to end biomedical research because of the theory that animals have rights ruling out their use in research. Scientists need to respond forcefully to animal rights advocates, whose arguments are confusing the public and thereby threatening advances in health knowledge and care. Leaders of the animal rights movement target biomedical research because it depends on public funding, and few people understand the process of health care research. Hearing allegations of cruelty to animals in research settings, many are perplexed that anyone would deliberately harm an animal.
For example, a grandmotherly woman staffing an animal rights booth at a recent street fair was distributing a brochure that encouraged readers not to use anything that comes from or is tested in animalsno meat, no fur, no medicines. Asked if she opposed immunizations, she wanted to know if vaccines come from animal research. When assured that they do, she replied, Then I would have to say yes. Asked what will happen when epidemics return, she said, Dont worry, scientists will find some way of using computers. Such well-meaning people just dont understand.
Scientists must communicate their message to the public in a compassionate, understandable way -- in human terms, not in the language of molecular biology. We need to make clear the connection between animal research and a grandmothers hip replacement, a fathers bypass operation, a babys vaccinations, and even a pets shots. To those who are unaware that animal research was needed to produce these treatments, as well as new treatments and vaccines, animal research seems wasteful at best and cruel at worst.
Much can be done. Scientists could adopt middle school classes and present their own research. They should be quick to respond to letters to the editor, lest animal rights misinformation go unchallenged and acquire a deceptive appearance of truth. Research institutions could be opened to tours, to show that laboratory animals receive humane care. Finally, because the ultimate stakeholders are patients, the health research community should actively recruit to its cause not only well-known personalities such as Stephen Cooper, who has made courageous statements about the value of animal research, but all who receive medical treatment. If good people do nothing there is a real possibility that an uninformed citizenry will extinguish the precious embers of medical progress.
流利美语随你讲Lesson21
流利美语随你讲Lesson8
趣味英语口语:跟脸面有关的口语
流利美语随你讲Lesson23
英语中颜色的运用!
流利美语随你讲Lesson29
出国留学怎么“吃”?
流利美语随你讲Lesson16
流利美语随你讲Lesson19
流利美语随你讲Lesson24
和人身体有关的短语!
生活口语:预订酒店房间
生活口语:餐桌英语大汇总
生活口语:上海的一天
流利美语随你讲Lesson25
英语中的动物及其文化寓意!
流利美语随你讲Lesson9
爆笑口语:4岁男孩打911求救数学题!
流利美语随你讲Lesson11
流利美语随你讲Lesson15
日常口语:换种方式话廉贵
用各种地道说法表达熬夜
甜蜜口语:N种说法教你说“亲爱的”
“打电话”的六个要点!
生活口语:关于死亡,西方也委婉!
日本人说英语完整搞笑版!
流利美语随你讲Lesson28
流利美语随你讲Lesson20
生活词汇:美国温情脉脉的真实“飞屋”
“猪流感”英文怎么说?
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |