To paraphrase 18th-century statesman Edmund Burke, all that is needed for the triumph of a misguided cause is that good people do nothing. One such cause now seeks to end biomedical research because of the theory that animals have rights ruling out their use in research. Scientists need to respond forcefully to animal rights advocates, whose arguments are confusing the public and thereby threatening advances in health knowledge and care. Leaders of the animal rights movement target biomedical research because it depends on public funding, and few people understand the process of health care research. Hearing allegations of cruelty to animals in research settings, many are perplexed that anyone would deliberately harm an animal.
For example, a grandmotherly woman staffing an animal rights booth at a recent street fair was distributing a brochure that encouraged readers not to use anything that comes from or is tested in animalsno meat, no fur, no medicines. Asked if she opposed immunizations, she wanted to know if vaccines come from animal research. When assured that they do, she replied, Then I would have to say yes. Asked what will happen when epidemics return, she said, Dont worry, scientists will find some way of using computers. Such well-meaning people just dont understand.
Scientists must communicate their message to the public in a compassionate, understandable way -- in human terms, not in the language of molecular biology. We need to make clear the connection between animal research and a grandmothers hip replacement, a fathers bypass operation, a babys vaccinations, and even a pets shots. To those who are unaware that animal research was needed to produce these treatments, as well as new treatments and vaccines, animal research seems wasteful at best and cruel at worst.
Much can be done. Scientists could adopt middle school classes and present their own research. They should be quick to respond to letters to the editor, lest animal rights misinformation go unchallenged and acquire a deceptive appearance of truth. Research institutions could be opened to tours, to show that laboratory animals receive humane care. Finally, because the ultimate stakeholders are patients, the health research community should actively recruit to its cause not only well-known personalities such as Stephen Cooper, who has made courageous statements about the value of animal research, but all who receive medical treatment. If good people do nothing there is a real possibility that an uninformed citizenry will extinguish the precious embers of medical progress.
2016年中考英语词组辨析:some time/ sometime/ sometimes/some times
2016年中考英语词组辨析:work / job
2016年中考英语词组辨析:think much(well) of/ think highly of
2016年中考英语词组辨析:sound/ voice/ noise
2016年中考英语词组辨析:on time/ in time
2016年中考英语词组辨析:talk with/ talk of/ talk on/ talk about
2016年中考英语词组辨析:about/ on
2016年中考英语词组辨析:pardon/ sorry/ excuse/
2016年中考英语词组辨析:point to/ point at
2016年中考英语词组辨析:personal/ personnel
2016年中考英语词组辨析:ache/pain
2016年中考英语词组辨析:subject/ theme/ topic
2016年中考英语词组辨析:police/ policeman
2016年中考英语词组辨析:towards/ to / for
2016年中考英语词组辨析:very / right / ju
2016年中考英语词组辨析:point / score
2016年中考英语词组辨析:surprise/ surprising/ surprised
2016年中考英语词组辨析:a bit/ a little
2016年中考英语词组辨析:that/ who/ which
2016年中考英语词组辨析:worth/ worthy
2016年中考英语词组辨析:quick/ fast / rapid /soon
2016年中考英语词组辨析:alive/ living/ the living/ live/ dead
2016年中考英语词组辨析:till/ until
2016年中考英语词组辨析:anyone/ any one
2016年中考英语词组辨析:river/ stream/ brook
2016年中考英语词组辨析:steal/ rob
2016年中考英语词组辨析:quite/ rather/ very
2016年中考英语词组辨析:thanks for/ thanks to
2016年中考英语词组辨析:see sb doing sth/ do sth
2016年中考英语词组辨析:above/over/on/upon
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |