To paraphrase 18th-century statesman Edmund Burke, all that is needed for the triumph of a misguided cause is that good people do nothing. One such cause now seeks to end biomedical research because of the theory that animals have rights ruling out their use in research. Scientists need to respond forcefully to animal rights advocates, whose arguments are confusing the public and thereby threatening advances in health knowledge and care. Leaders of the animal rights movement target biomedical research because it depends on public funding, and few people understand the process of health care research. Hearing allegations of cruelty to animals in research settings, many are perplexed that anyone would deliberately harm an animal.
For example, a grandmotherly woman staffing an animal rights booth at a recent street fair was distributing a brochure that encouraged readers not to use anything that comes from or is tested in animalsno meat, no fur, no medicines. Asked if she opposed immunizations, she wanted to know if vaccines come from animal research. When assured that they do, she replied, Then I would have to say yes. Asked what will happen when epidemics return, she said, Dont worry, scientists will find some way of using computers. Such well-meaning people just dont understand.
Scientists must communicate their message to the public in a compassionate, understandable way -- in human terms, not in the language of molecular biology. We need to make clear the connection between animal research and a grandmothers hip replacement, a fathers bypass operation, a babys vaccinations, and even a pets shots. To those who are unaware that animal research was needed to produce these treatments, as well as new treatments and vaccines, animal research seems wasteful at best and cruel at worst.
Much can be done. Scientists could adopt middle school classes and present their own research. They should be quick to respond to letters to the editor, lest animal rights misinformation go unchallenged and acquire a deceptive appearance of truth. Research institutions could be opened to tours, to show that laboratory animals receive humane care. Finally, because the ultimate stakeholders are patients, the health research community should actively recruit to its cause not only well-known personalities such as Stephen Cooper, who has made courageous statements about the value of animal research, but all who receive medical treatment. If good people do nothing there is a real possibility that an uninformed citizenry will extinguish the precious embers of medical progress.
盘点2011年度步入婚姻殿堂的明星夫妻
水浒故事:倒拔垂杨柳
掩耳盗铃
75%的人会揭发上司不法行为(双语)
一只口渴的狗
情人节约会指南:经典妙语帮你“俘获芳心”
贵阳最美女孩:90后少女寒夜跳河救人
约翰尼-德普被曝与女友争吵不断 恋情告急
双语美文:西方情人节的传统
l played with some kangaroos
有关清明节的英语作文
伊索寓言7
披着狮皮的驴The ass in the lions skin
Facebook上市:扎克伯格的公开信(双语)
伊索寓言9
嫁妆给多少? 游戏“愤怒的新娘”走红网络
怎样度过浪漫情人节(双语)
元宵节来历传说之关于元宵节点彩灯的来历
盘点2011年最受关注的英语词汇和名字(双语)
“情人节”礼物——播种爱情
小人儿的礼物的故事
这个情人节 送什么给“他”?
怎样轻松摆脱“节后忧虑症”(双语)
伊索寓言——老 鬣 狗
双语:情人节表白秘籍 教你写封甜蜜情书
最新研究:散播流言也有好处?!(双语)
2012最值得期待的10件事
BBC:IE浏览器用户智商低?
双语揭秘:“反情人节”的损招
伊索寓言之受伤的狼和精明的羊
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |