To paraphrase 18th-century statesman Edmund Burke, all that is needed for the triumph of a misguided cause is that good people do nothing. One such cause now seeks to end biomedical research because of the theory that animals have rights ruling out their use in research. Scientists need to respond forcefully to animal rights advocates, whose arguments are confusing the public and thereby threatening advances in health knowledge and care. Leaders of the animal rights movement target biomedical research because it depends on public funding, and few people understand the process of health care research. Hearing allegations of cruelty to animals in research settings, many are perplexed that anyone would deliberately harm an animal.
For example, a grandmotherly woman staffing an animal rights booth at a recent street fair was distributing a brochure that encouraged readers not to use anything that comes from or is tested in animalsno meat, no fur, no medicines. Asked if she opposed immunizations, she wanted to know if vaccines come from animal research. When assured that they do, she replied, Then I would have to say yes. Asked what will happen when epidemics return, she said, Dont worry, scientists will find some way of using computers. Such well-meaning people just dont understand.
Scientists must communicate their message to the public in a compassionate, understandable way -- in human terms, not in the language of molecular biology. We need to make clear the connection between animal research and a grandmothers hip replacement, a fathers bypass operation, a babys vaccinations, and even a pets shots. To those who are unaware that animal research was needed to produce these treatments, as well as new treatments and vaccines, animal research seems wasteful at best and cruel at worst.
Much can be done. Scientists could adopt middle school classes and present their own research. They should be quick to respond to letters to the editor, lest animal rights misinformation go unchallenged and acquire a deceptive appearance of truth. Research institutions could be opened to tours, to show that laboratory animals receive humane care. Finally, because the ultimate stakeholders are patients, the health research community should actively recruit to its cause not only well-known personalities such as Stephen Cooper, who has made courageous statements about the value of animal research, but all who receive medical treatment. If good people do nothing there is a real possibility that an uninformed citizenry will extinguish the precious embers of medical progress.
让你决战雅思听力考场的6个必胜技巧
雅思听力备考攻略
雅思考试辅导:听力题型2
屠鸭大牛帮你搞定雅思听力Section 4
雅思听力重要词汇汇总
专家解析雅思听力的出题陷阱
雅思听力考试的难点在哪里?
雅思听力选择题的2个高分技巧
雅思听力选择题及填空题同义转换原则透析
雅思听力备考强化阶段需小心出题陷阱
如何调节雅思听力考试的紧张心理
雅思听力Section 4该如何应对?
雅思真题听力场景精练:新生报到与培训(5)
雅思听力测验的一些小技巧
雅思真题听力场景精练:新生报到与培训(3)
雅思听力中的恐怖澳音
雅思听力单词句子到篇章 练好听感不马虎
名师指导如何拿下雅思听力高分
雅思听力考试技巧--把握主题
解读雅思听力考试中的正态分布原则
雅思听力考试中常碰到的地名
如何捕捉雅思听力中的数字
雅思考试听力试题评分准则评析
雅思听力高分如何拿:声音就是语音
专家告诉你雅思听力的反应速度如何提高
雅思听力外围突击法:善用英语资讯巧练习(上)
考生分享雅思听力水平的提高办法
名师为你解析雅思听力之“读”和“猜”
雅思听力外围突击法:善用英语资讯巧练习(下)
雅思听力考试常用地名总结
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |