To paraphrase 18th-century statesman Edmund Burke, all that is needed for the triumph of a misguided cause is that good people do nothing. One such cause now seeks to end biomedical research because of the theory that animals have rights ruling out their use in research. Scientists need to respond forcefully to animal rights advocates, whose arguments are confusing the public and thereby threatening advances in health knowledge and care. Leaders of the animal rights movement target biomedical research because it depends on public funding, and few people understand the process of health care research. Hearing allegations of cruelty to animals in research settings, many are perplexed that anyone would deliberately harm an animal.
For example, a grandmotherly woman staffing an animal rights booth at a recent street fair was distributing a brochure that encouraged readers not to use anything that comes from or is tested in animalsno meat, no fur, no medicines. Asked if she opposed immunizations, she wanted to know if vaccines come from animal research. When assured that they do, she replied, Then I would have to say yes. Asked what will happen when epidemics return, she said, Dont worry, scientists will find some way of using computers. Such well-meaning people just dont understand.
Scientists must communicate their message to the public in a compassionate, understandable way -- in human terms, not in the language of molecular biology. We need to make clear the connection between animal research and a grandmothers hip replacement, a fathers bypass operation, a babys vaccinations, and even a pets shots. To those who are unaware that animal research was needed to produce these treatments, as well as new treatments and vaccines, animal research seems wasteful at best and cruel at worst.
Much can be done. Scientists could adopt middle school classes and present their own research. They should be quick to respond to letters to the editor, lest animal rights misinformation go unchallenged and acquire a deceptive appearance of truth. Research institutions could be opened to tours, to show that laboratory animals receive humane care. Finally, because the ultimate stakeholders are patients, the health research community should actively recruit to its cause not only well-known personalities such as Stephen Cooper, who has made courageous statements about the value of animal research, but all who receive medical treatment. If good people do nothing there is a real possibility that an uninformed citizenry will extinguish the precious embers of medical progress.
盘点雅思听力背景词汇
如何突破英语口语
名师:你该掌握的“英语谚语佳句汇总”(N部分)
真正提高英语听力的八点建议《听力方法》
新东方名师:中高级口译口语话题之家庭教育
英语口语浅谈:用心就好,相信自己
翻译答案
名师支招:英语口语学习方法
如何提高英语水平之听力篇(四)
英语口语学习的三境界
新东方名师:中高级口译口语话题之交通状况
经验交流:提高英语听力的小窍门
新东方名师:中高级口译口语应对策略(1)
托福听力主要题型及解题要点
雅思听力:怎么掌握雅思听力中的词汇衔接
白领必看:实用外企office常用英语
专家支招:练好英语口语的“锦囊妙计”
跟读 提高英语听说能力的有效方法
翻译答案(2)
托福听力:盘点60个最难记的托福听力高频词
新东方:提高英语四六级听力必知技巧
雅思听力备考方法:加强语感和词汇的练习
如何用语调判断说话人的意思
雅思听力:听力的11个评分标准
提高英语听力的六种方法
雅思听力考试的特点和学习方法
看口语书能提高口语水平吗
名师漫谈:如何提高英语听力
词汇的差别:英式英语Vs美式英语
雅思听力技巧:好习惯能有效提高雅思听力成绩
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |