In recent years, railroads have been combining with each other, merging into super systems, causing heightened concerns about monopoly. As recently as 1995, the top four railroads accounted for under 70 percent of the total ton-miles moved by rails. Next year, after a series of mergers is completed, just four railroads will control well over 90 percent of all the freight moved by major rail carriers.
Supporters of the new super systems argue that these mergers will allow for substantial cost reductions and better coordinated service. Any threat of monopoly, they argue, is removed by fierce competition from trucks. But many shippers complain that for heavy bulk commodities traveling long distances, such as coal, chemicals, and grain, trucking is too costly and the railroads therefore have them by the throat.
The vast consolidation within the rail industry means that most shippers are served by only one rail company. Railroads typically charge such captive shippers 20 to 30 percent more than they do when another railroad is competing for the business. Shippers who feel they are being overcharged have the right to appeal to the federal governments Surface Transportation Board for rate relief, but the process is expensive, time-consuming, and will work only in truly extreme cases.
Railroads justify rate discrimination against captive shippers on the grounds that in the long run it reduces everyones cost. If railroads charged all customers the same average rate, they argue, shippers who have the option of switching to trucks or other forms of transportation would do so, leaving remaining customers to shoulder the cost of keeping up the line. Its a theory to which many economists subscribe, but in practice it often leaves railroads in the position of determining which companies will flourish and which will fail. Do we really want railroads to be the arbiters of who wins and who loses in the marketplace? asks Martin Bercovici, a Washington lawyer who frequently represents shipper.
Many captive shippers also worry they will soon be hit with a round of huge rate increases. The railroad industry as a whole, despite its brightening fortunes, still does not earn enough to cover the cost of the capital it must invest to keep up with its surging traffic. Yet railroads continue to borrow billions to acquire one another, with Wall Street cheering them on. Consider the $10.2 billion bid by Norfolk Southern and CSX to acquire Conrail this year. Conrails net railway operating income in 1996 was just $427 million, less than half of the carrying costs of the transaction. Whos going to pay for the rest of the bill? Many captive shippers fear that they will, as Norfolk Southern and CSX increase their grip on the market.
北京现“求婚新三件”
“金球奖魔咒”真有那么厉害?
快播被吊销“增值电信业务”
“百度动物园”儿童节正式上线
亚马逊“跨境电商平台”落户上海
高考“防作弊举措”
足球场上的“假摔”及其它欺诈行为
“耽美派”文学受中国宅女追捧
世界杯“功能性球衫”被检出有毒物质或致不育
天气闷热 世界杯首现“喝水暂停”
贪官钱太多烧坏“点钞机”
环保部定义“灰霾污染日”
八角游乐园等地铁站将实行“人物同检”
房地产税最早明年启动 新税将“房地合一”
一季度中国银行业“坏账率”创3年最高
“军工企业”高管纷纷落马
中国“本土操作系统”或10月面世
印度发起“米桶挑战”
各地备战高考举措
京沪穗汉将试点“反按揭”
泰国“军事政变”
“点球大战”决胜负
“地方立法权”拟扩大至所有设区市
卡塔尔接受世界杯“贿选”调查
政府采购禁“Win8操作系统”
戛纳评奖背后的故事
西安一民政局离婚“限号”
盘古氏告《变形金刚4》合作方“合同欺诈”
“西瓜办”邀网友买西瓜
“固体废物走私”犯罪同比大增
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |