In recent years, railroads have been combining with each other, merging into super systems, causing heightened concerns about monopoly. As recently as 1995, the top four railroads accounted for under 70 percent of the total ton-miles moved by rails. Next year, after a series of mergers is completed, just four railroads will control well over 90 percent of all the freight moved by major rail carriers.
Supporters of the new super systems argue that these mergers will allow for substantial cost reductions and better coordinated service. Any threat of monopoly, they argue, is removed by fierce competition from trucks. But many shippers complain that for heavy bulk commodities traveling long distances, such as coal, chemicals, and grain, trucking is too costly and the railroads therefore have them by the throat.
The vast consolidation within the rail industry means that most shippers are served by only one rail company. Railroads typically charge such captive shippers 20 to 30 percent more than they do when another railroad is competing for the business. Shippers who feel they are being overcharged have the right to appeal to the federal governments Surface Transportation Board for rate relief, but the process is expensive, time-consuming, and will work only in truly extreme cases.
Railroads justify rate discrimination against captive shippers on the grounds that in the long run it reduces everyones cost. If railroads charged all customers the same average rate, they argue, shippers who have the option of switching to trucks or other forms of transportation would do so, leaving remaining customers to shoulder the cost of keeping up the line. Its a theory to which many economists subscribe, but in practice it often leaves railroads in the position of determining which companies will flourish and which will fail. Do we really want railroads to be the arbiters of who wins and who loses in the marketplace? asks Martin Bercovici, a Washington lawyer who frequently represents shipper.
Many captive shippers also worry they will soon be hit with a round of huge rate increases. The railroad industry as a whole, despite its brightening fortunes, still does not earn enough to cover the cost of the capital it must invest to keep up with its surging traffic. Yet railroads continue to borrow billions to acquire one another, with Wall Street cheering them on. Consider the $10.2 billion bid by Norfolk Southern and CSX to acquire Conrail this year. Conrails net railway operating income in 1996 was just $427 million, less than half of the carrying costs of the transaction. Whos going to pay for the rest of the bill? Many captive shippers fear that they will, as Norfolk Southern and CSX increase their grip on the market.
雅思写作范文:智能机器人能否代替人?(一)
雅思小作文的五大误解
雅思大作文话题:职业与生活
雅思写作范文:老年人住家里or养老院?
雅思写作高分密钥:逻辑连接词
22个经典雅思大作文题目论据拓展
雅思写作范文:出国学习的利弊 何时是最佳年龄?
雅思写作范文:考虑未来比关注现在更重要?
各类型雅思小作文写作技巧介绍
雅思写作范文:广告误导消费者,政府应采取措施吗?
重视评分标准 突破雅思写作高分
雅思写作范文:男女分校的利弊
雅思写作提纲:古迹是否应该保留
雅思写作范文:政府应不应该鼓励市民移居小城市?
雅思写作需“四重视一巧用”
雅思写作范文:国际援助是否应该?
雅思写作提纲:青少年犯罪与毒品滥用
雅思写作范文:如何保护濒临灭绝的动物
雅思写作提纲:考试利弊
雅思写作范文:独居的利弊
雅思写作范文:政府应该把钱花在何处?(五)
雅思写作提纲:频繁跳槽的原因及解决
雅思写作提纲:科技产品利弊
雅思写作范文:汽车在现代生活中的利弊
雅思写作范文:妇女犯罪率提高的原因和解决
雅思写作提纲:如何对待罪犯
雅思写作范文:智能机器人能否代替人?(二)
雅思写作范文:电脑替代老师?(二)
雅思写作提纲:明星是否应该拿高薪?
雅思写作范文:电脑替代老师?(一)
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |