下面GMAT思为大家整理了GMAT写作:满分作文必备模板,供考生们参考,以下是详细内容。
In this argument, the author concludes that To support his conclusion, the author points out that. In addition, the author reasons that Further more, he also assumes that . At first glance, the authors argument appears to be somehow appealing, while a close examination will reveal how groundless it is. We do not have to look very far to see the invalidity of this argument. This argument is problematic for the following reasons.
In the first place, this argument rests on a gratuitous assumption that .The author unfairly assumes that. However, the assumption is questionable because the author provides no evidence to support this argument. The arguer fails to take into account other facts that might contribute to the result that It is likely that , it is also likely that Any of these scenarios, if true, would show that Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility.
In the second place, the argument commits a logic fallacy of after this and therefore because of this. In no case can the mere fact that be cited as evidence to support the assumption that there is a causal-effect relationship between A and B. Moreover, that just because B can be statistically correlated with A does not necessarily mean that A is the cause of B. In fact, the author has obviously neglected the possibility of other alternative facts such as, or may contribute to a certain extent to B. It may be only a coincidence that . Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to , this assumption in question can not be accepted.
In the third place, the evidence that the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is rarely sufficient to establish a general conclusion. Unless the arguer can show that A1 is representative of all A, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted. In fact, in face of such limited evidence, it is fallacious to draw any conclusion at all.
In the fourth place, the argument has also committed a false analogy fallacy. The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects, and the author assumes without justification that all things are equal, and that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. There is, however, no guarantee that this is the case. Nor does the author cite any evidence to support this assumption. Lacking this assumption, the conclusion that is entirely unfounded. In fact, it is highly doubtful that the facts drawn from B are applicable to A. Differences between A and B clearly out weight the similarities, thus making the analogy highly less than valid. For example, A, however, B Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do
In addition, the conclusion unjustifiably relies on the poll while the validity of the survey itself is doubtful. The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who, when, how and by whom the survey is conducted, neither does it mention what is the sample size, or how the samples are selected. Until these questions are answered the results are worthless as evidence to support that.
Besides, the author assumes that A and B are mutually exclusive alternatives. However, the author has never offered any reasons or evidences for imposing an either/or choice. Common sense and observation tells us that adjoining both A and B might produce better results.
To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the author claims. To make the argument more convincing concerning. , the arguer would have to provide more information that. The arguer should also demonstrate that.to make this argument logically acceptable.
Since the author commits the above mentioned logical mistakes and fails to consider the whole situation comprehensively, his ideas should not be adopted. The conclusion would be strengthened if he.
In conclusion, the arguer fails to substantiate his claim that . Because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer claims. To strengthen the argument, the arguer must convince us that. In addition, the arguer could have to provide more precise information to support his claim.
It is entirely possible that management has become lax regarding any number of factors that can affect the bottom line such as inferior products, careless product pricing, inefficient production, poor employee expense monitoring, ineffective advertising, sloppy buying policies and other wasteful spending.
以上就是GMAT写作:满分作文必备模板的详细内容,考生可针对文中介绍的方法进行有针对性的备考。最后,GMAT预祝大家在GMAT考试中取得好成绩!
美国民众:川普你快关了推特吧!别出来丢人了
四川省成都市2016届高考英语阅读理解二轮提升训练(42)(含解析)
2016最震撼的6个科学事件
四川省成都市2016届高考英语阅读理解二轮提升训练(3)(含解析)
奥巴马离任倒计时:最后1次访谈 搬家准备让贤
2016届四川青神高考英语二轮复习阅读理解选练(3)
2016届山东省胶州市高考英语二轮写作赏析精编(3)
四川省成都市2016届高考英语阅读理解二轮提升训练(31)(含解析)
2016届安徽芜湖市高考英语二轮阅读理解基础练习(3)
四川省成都市2016届高考英语阅读理解二轮提升训练(1)(含解析)
2016届山东省胶州市高考英语二轮写作赏析精编(5)
四川省成都市2016届高考英语阅读理解二轮提升训练(48)(含解析)
四川省成都市2016届高考英语阅读理解二轮提升训练(36)(含解析)
智商不足怎么破?神经科学家说有一个好方法!
四川省成都市2016届高考英语阅读理解二轮提升训练(50)(含解析)
2016届四川青神高考英语二轮复习阅读理解选练(4)
四川省成都市2016届高考英语阅读理解二轮提升训练(2)(含解析)
2016届山东省胶州市高考英语二轮写作赏析精编(1)
四川省成都市2016届高考英语阅读理解二轮提升训练(41)(含解析)
春运这场最壮观的人口迁徙老外今年又来围观了
美公司拟建4800米“抗霾楼”
四川省成都市2016届高考英语阅读理解二轮提升训练(29)(含解析)
四川省成都市2016届高考英语阅读理解二轮提升训练(37)(含解析)
美文赏析:请先洗干净你自己的杯子
四川省成都市2016届高考英语阅读理解二轮提升训练(40)(含解析)
四川省成都市2016届高考英语阅读理解二轮提升训练(27)(含解析)
四川省成都市2016届高考英语阅读理解二轮提升训练(45)(含解析)
2016届四川青神高考英语二轮复习阅读理解选练(2)
白宫最佳CP 奥巴马与拜登基情满满
2016届山西长治高考英语二轮复习阅读理解精练(5)
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |