下面GMAT思为大家整理了GMAT写作攻略:背模板三重境界,供考生们参考,以下是详细内容。
2. 中间段
First, the argument is based on a false analogy. The arguer simply assumes that airplane mechanics and automobile maintenance crews perform many similar functions, but he does not provide any evidence that their functions are indeed comparable. As we know, the structure, operation and function of airplanes and those of automobiles differ conspicuously. It is true that both the airplane and the automobile need refueling and engine maintenance, but even here there exist fundamental differences: the structure and the building materials of each others engines are different, so is the oil they use. Therefore, even though the two-week Quality-Care Seminar proved effective in improving the performance of the maintenance crews in the automobile racing industry, there is no guarantee that it will work just as well for airplane mechanics.
Second, the arguer commits a fallacy of hasty generalization. Even if the maintenance of the airline has been improved as a result of sending its mechanics to the Seminar, which is, of course , unwarranted assumption, it does not follow that there will be greater profits as well as greater customer satisfaction for airline. As we know, customer satisfaction depends on several major factors other than good maintenance of the airplane. For instance, customers are generally concerned about the punctuality, the on-board service, the ticket price, the luggage handling procedure and even the discount, all of which are ignored by the arguer. Besides, the arguer does not provide any solid information concerning how the airplane can improve its profits. Unless Get-Away Airlines can significantly increase its customers or passengers and at the same time cut down its costs, both of which are unknown from this argument, there is no guarantee that it will inevitably harvest greater profits. Actually, the arguers recommendation of investing in this training program a the only way to increase customer satisfaction an profits would most probably turn out to be ineffective and misleading.
In the first place, the arguer fails to take into account the geographical factors in the analysis. While we informed that there are wide geographical differences in the nation of Claria, and that many citizens are experiencing rising costs of electricity, the arguer fails to make clear the exact number of those citizens or their percentage in the national population, as well as the geographical distribution of these citizens. If only a small portion of the whole population are experiencing the rising costs of electricity while most familiars do not have similar experience, then the reason might be that the former do not use electricity sparingly. In this case, the rising costs of those families have nothing to do with what kind of electric appliance they use to cool their house. Or if only families living in hot areas are spending more money on cooling, then it is unwise to require citizens living in temperate and frigid zones to install both fans and air conditioners, in the absence of all this information, it is impossible for us to install both fans and air conditioners. In the absence of all this information, it is impossible for us to evaluate the recommended policy that is intended to help every household nationwide to reduce their electricity cost.
In the second place , the comparison in this argument is incomplete and selective, the arguer discovers that using fans alone is more cost effective than using air conditions alone, and that using both fans and air conditioners are the least expensive way of cooling. However, the arguer fails to provide any information regarding the actual amount of time for using, respectively, fans alone, air conditioners alone, and both fans and air conditioners in those three groups of surveyed families. It is very likely that these three groups of families are located in three very different climatic regions of Claria, and hence the amount of days of the year during which they need to cool their houses varies significantly. Families living in cooler areas of the nation certainly cool their houses for fewer hours and hence use less electricity than families living in hot areas, no matter what cooling appliance they use. Unless we are certain that the surveyed families ling in the same climatic region, or that they need to cool their houses for the same amount of hours in the same year although they live in different regions, which is very unlikely, we have every reason to doubt the trustworthiness of this comparative study. Furthermore on electricity may be using more electricity for purposes other than cooling. Unless the arguer also takes this factor into consideration, the comparison is unconvincing.
以上就是GMAT写作攻略:背模板三重境界的详细内容,考生可针对文中介绍的方法进行有针对性的备考。最后,GMAT预祝大家在GMAT考试中取得好成绩!
浪漫英文情书精选:My Heart And Soul我的灵魂
英语美文:生命这个奇迹
精选英语美文阅读:山居秋暝
精选英语美文阅读:一封未发出的英文情书《但是你没有》
精选英语美文阅读:被忽略的爱 Helpless love
伤感美文:人生若只如初见
双语美文欣赏:孤独人生
人生哲理:年轻无悔 别停下追寻梦想的脚步
浪漫英文情书精选:Don't Give Up不要放弃
26个英文字母蕴含的人生哲理
浪漫英文情书精选:Keep You Forever永远温存着你
精选英语美文阅读:爱的奇迹 Keep on Singing
精美散文:守护自己的天使
英语美文:A Psalm of Life 人生礼颂
英文《小王子》温情语录
如果生命可以重来(双语)
英语美文:一双丝袜(有声)
精美散文:爱你所做 做你所爱
精选英语散文欣赏:微笑挽救生命
精选英语美文阅读:假如生活欺骗了你
态度决定一切 Attitude Is Everything
英语晨读:潘多拉
最美的英文情诗:请允许我成为你的夏季
浪漫英文情书精选:Is It Love?这是爱么?
英语美文:红色 Red (双语)
生命可以是一座玫瑰花园
美文欣赏:海边漫步
英语美文30篇系列之21
英语美文欣赏:A beautiful song
精选英语美文阅读:你见或者不见我(中英对照)
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |