78. The following appeared in the editorial section of a monthly business newsmagazine.
Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
In this editorial, the author argues that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer, in support of this claim the author reasons that since wages paid to employees should increase as the risk of physical injury increases, the converse should be true as well. Hence, by decreasing the risk of injury, employers could decrease the wages paid to workers and thereby save money. This argument is unconvincing for two reasons.
To begin with the author assumes that because companies would agree that as risk of injury increases wages should also increase, they would also agree that as risk decreases wages should also decrease accordingly. This is tantamount to the assumption that risk of injury is the primary factor that determines workers wages. It is obvious that few employers, and even fewer employees, would agree that this is the case. To adopt this position one would have to disregard education, experience, and skill as equally important factors in determining the wages paid to workers.
Secondly, the authors reasoning suggests that the only benefit of a safer workplace is the savings employers could realize from lower wages. This is obviously not true. The costs associated with accidents on the job could far outweigh any savings that could be realized by paying workers lower wages.
In conclusion, the authors argument is unconvincing. Risk of injury is an important factor to consider in determining the wages paid to workers but is not the only such factor. Furthermore, there are far better reasons for employers to make
the workplace safer than the one presented by the author.
much可修饰哪些词语
both, either, neither, all, any, none
副词在句中的位置特点
fairly, quite, rather, very 与 pretty的用法区别
副词的主要句法功能
不定代词
反身代词不用作定语
英语焦点副词
不定代词用作状语
代词比较辩异 one,that 和it
anyone/any one;no one/none;every/each
first与at first的用法区别
英语副词的句法功能
指示代词
形容词和副词比较级的常用句型及应用
many, much
人称代词的用法
并列人称代词的排列顺序
no longer,not...any longer与no more,not...any more
very, much 与 very much
ago 与 before的用法区别
比较等级前常见修饰语归纳
英语副词的分类
关系代词
疑问代词
代词的指代问题
物主代词
"the"的妙用
fairly, quite, rather, very, pretty的语法区别
与反身代词连用的常用动词搭配
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |