18. The following is an excerpt from a memo written by the head of a governmental department.
Neither stronger ethics regulations nor stronger enforcement mechanisms are necessary to ensure ethical behavior by companies doing business with this department. We already have a code of ethics that companies doing business with this department are urged to abide by, and virtually all of these companies have agreed to follow it. We also know that the code is relevant to the current business environment because it was approved within the last year, and in direct response to specific violations committed by companies with which we were then working―not in abstract anticipation of potential violations, as so many such codes are.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
In this argument, the head of a government department concludes that the department does not need to strengthen either its ethics regulations or its enforcement mechanisms in order to encourage ethical behavior by companies with which it does business. The first reason given is that businesses have agreed to follow the departments existing code of ethics. The second reason is that the existing code is relevant to the current business environment. This argument is unacceptable for several reasons.
The sole support for the claim that stronger enforcement mechanisms are unnecessary comes from the assumption that companies will simply keep their promises to follow the existing code. But, since the department head clearly refers to rules violations by these same businesses within the past year, his faith in their word is obviously misplaced. Moreover, it is commonly understood that effective rules carry with them methods of enforcement and penalties for violations.
To show that a strengthened code is unnecessary, the department head claims that the existing code of ethics is relevant. In partial clarification of the vague term relevant, we are told that the existing code was approved in direct response to violations occurring in the past year. If the full significance of being relevant is that the code responds to last years violations, then the department head must assume that those violations will be representative of all the kinds of ethics problems that concern the department. This is unlikely; in addition, thinking so produces an oddly short-sighted idea of relevance.
Such a narrow conception of the relevance of an ethics code points up its weakness. The strength of an ethics code lies in its capacity to cover many different instances of the general kinds of behavior thought to be unethical―to cover not only last years specific violations, but those of previous years and years to come. Yet this author explicitly rejects a comprehensive code, preferring the existing code because it is relevant and not in abstract anticipation of potential violations.
In sum, this argument is naive, vague and poorly reasoned. The department head has not given careful thought to the connection between rules and their enforcement, to what makes an ethics code relevant, or to how comprehensiveness strengthens a code. In the final analysis, he adopts a backwards view that a history of violations should determine rules of ethics, rather than the other way around.
英国俚语背后的故事:乱七八糟
英国惊悚故事:《无头骑士》
名家散文鉴赏:An Illusion,一种错觉
英国俚语背后的故事:叫错树即不分青红皂白
英国俚语背后的故事:节日盛装
英国俚语背后的故事:猴子捞月
英国惊悚故事旋即:《房顶的工人》
你知道你缺乏什么维生素吗?
英国俚语背后的故事:自己眼中有梁木
你未必了解的、目标明确对你的工作的意义(一)
你应该知道的十条人生哲理,你全听说过吗
12种为你带来大钱的方法
英国惊悚故事:《茂林路》
机智能助你成功,但若不机智将会发生什么
英国俚语背后的故事:鸡尾酒的来历
错过这些想法,错过的可能是人生的成功
英国俚语背后的故事:数豆子就是目光短浅吗?
英语俚语背后的故事:draw the longbow
英国俚语背后的故事:条条大路通罗马
英国俚语背后的故事:古风式微笑
爱因斯坦哲理散文:人乃为了别人而活
英国俚语背后的故事:拳击手为何击打空气
双语美文:月亮给我的人生启示
英语俚语背后的故事:“驴”年马月
英国俚语背后的故事:四面楚歌
双语美文:微笑与寿命的关系
英国俚语背后的故事:幸福青鸟
英国俚语背后的故事:老大哥的含义
名家散文鉴赏:Three Passions I have Lived for(吾之三愿)
英国俚语背后的故事:患难之交
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |