21. The following appeared as part of an editorial in an industry newsletter.
While trucking companies that deliver goods pay only a portion of highway maintenance costs and no property tax on the highways they use, railways spend billions per year maintaining and upgrading their facilities. The government should lower the railroad companies property taxes, since sending goods by rail is clearly a more appropriate mode of ground transportation than highway shipping. For one thing, trains consume only a third of the fuel a truck would use to carry the same load, making them a more cost-effective and environmentally sound mode of transport. Furthermore, since rail lines already exist, increases in rail traffic would not require building new lines at the expense of taxpaying citizens.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
The conclusion of this editorial is that the government should lower property taxes for railroad companies. The first reason given is that railroads spend billions per year maintaining and upgrading their facilities. The second reason is that shipping goods by rail is cost-effective and environmentally sound. This argument is unconvincing for several reasons.
First of all, the argument depends upon a misleading comparison between railroad and truck company expenditures. Although trucking companies do not pay property tax on roads they use, they do pay such taxes on the yards, warehouses and maintenance facilities they own. And while trucking companies pay only a portion of road maintenance costs, this is because they are not sole users of public roads. Railroad companies shoulder the entire burden of maintenance and taxes on their own facilities and tracks; but they distribute these costs to other users through usage fees.
In addition, the author assumes that property taxes should be structured to provide incentives for cost-effective and environmentally beneficial business practices. This assumption is questionable because property taxes are normally structured to reflect the value of property. Moreover, the author seems to think that cost-effectiveness and environmental soundness are equally relevant to the question of tax relief. However, these are separate considerations. The environmental soundness of a practice might be relevant in determining tax structuring, but society does not compensate a business for its cost-efficiency.
Splitting the issues of cost-efficiency and environmental impact highlights an ambiguity in the claim that railway shipping is more appropriate. On the one hand, it may be appropriate, or prudent, for me to ship furniture by rail because it is cost-effective; on the other hand, it might be appropriate, or socially correct, to encourage more railway shipping because it is environmentally sound. The argument thus trades on an equivocation between social correctness on the one hand, and personal or business prudence on the other.
In sum, this argument is a confusion of weak comparisons, mixed issues and equivocal claims. I would not accept the conclusion without first determining: the factors relevant to tax structure, whether specific tax benefits should accrue to property as well as to income and capital gains taxes, whether railway shipping really does provide greater social benefits, and whether it is correct to motivate more railway shipping on this basis.
2012年2月25日雅思的范文:课外活动
2012年6月16日雅思考试阅读的回忆
2012年6月16日,17日雅思口语蹲点话题的汇总
2012年5月10日雅思的范文:Advertisements
2012年5月12日口语考题的回忆
2012年5月19日雅思阅读的回忆
2012年6月14日雅思考试写作的回忆
2012年5月26日雅思考试写作的回忆
名师范文:2012年04月12日雅思写作的范文
英国(2012年4月)真题的范文:男人不适合做家务事
2012年4月21日雅思考试的回忆(网友回忆版)
2012年6月9日/10日雅思考试口语的回忆
2012年6月9日雅思考试阅读的回忆
剑7Test4口语Part2的真题及解析
2012年6月16日雅思的范文:认识邻居
2012年4月12日雅思写作第一时间的回忆
2012年5月19日雅思听力的回忆
2012年5月19日雅思考题的回忆
2012年5月26日雅思的范文:资助艺术
2012年5月12日雅思的范文:监狱教育
2012年3月10日雅思的范文:但愿人长寿
听力部分:2012年3月10日雅思考试的回忆
2012年6月16日雅思考试听力的回忆
2012年6月14日雅思的范文:Scientific Research
2012年6月9日雅思考试听力的回忆
2012年6月9日雅思考试写作的回忆
2012年3月31日真题的范文:老人重要还是儿童更重要?
2012年3月31日雅思写作的回忆
2012年6月9日雅思考试考题的回顾
2012年4月28日雅思写作解析及5月10日考试展望
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |