21. The following appeared as part of an editorial in an industry newsletter.
While trucking companies that deliver goods pay only a portion of highway maintenance costs and no property tax on the highways they use, railways spend billions per year maintaining and upgrading their facilities. The government should lower the railroad companies property taxes, since sending goods by rail is clearly a more appropriate mode of ground transportation than highway shipping. For one thing, trains consume only a third of the fuel a truck would use to carry the same load, making them a more cost-effective and environmentally sound mode of transport. Furthermore, since rail lines already exist, increases in rail traffic would not require building new lines at the expense of taxpaying citizens.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
The conclusion of this editorial is that the government should lower property taxes for railroad companies. The first reason given is that railroads spend billions per year maintaining and upgrading their facilities. The second reason is that shipping goods by rail is cost-effective and environmentally sound. This argument is unconvincing for several reasons.
First of all, the argument depends upon a misleading comparison between railroad and truck company expenditures. Although trucking companies do not pay property tax on roads they use, they do pay such taxes on the yards, warehouses and maintenance facilities they own. And while trucking companies pay only a portion of road maintenance costs, this is because they are not sole users of public roads. Railroad companies shoulder the entire burden of maintenance and taxes on their own facilities and tracks; but they distribute these costs to other users through usage fees.
In addition, the author assumes that property taxes should be structured to provide incentives for cost-effective and environmentally beneficial business practices. This assumption is questionable because property taxes are normally structured to reflect the value of property. Moreover, the author seems to think that cost-effectiveness and environmental soundness are equally relevant to the question of tax relief. However, these are separate considerations. The environmental soundness of a practice might be relevant in determining tax structuring, but society does not compensate a business for its cost-efficiency.
Splitting the issues of cost-efficiency and environmental impact highlights an ambiguity in the claim that railway shipping is more appropriate. On the one hand, it may be appropriate, or prudent, for me to ship furniture by rail because it is cost-effective; on the other hand, it might be appropriate, or socially correct, to encourage more railway shipping because it is environmentally sound. The argument thus trades on an equivocation between social correctness on the one hand, and personal or business prudence on the other.
In sum, this argument is a confusion of weak comparisons, mixed issues and equivocal claims. I would not accept the conclusion without first determining: the factors relevant to tax structure, whether specific tax benefits should accrue to property as well as to income and capital gains taxes, whether railway shipping really does provide greater social benefits, and whether it is correct to motivate more railway shipping on this basis.
SAT阅读 题目中常见的修辞手段(2)
SAT阅读考试内容说明
SAT阅读技巧双篇对比文章
SAT阅读高分的答题窍门
分析SAT阅读文章特点
SAT阅读获得高分须知
SAT阅读 假设题的解题思路
SAT阅读填空部分逻辑关系解读
SAT阅读 词汇是突破的重点
SAT阅读速度慢的原因及提高办法
SAT阅读实例 Machine learning
SAT阅读提分之多看外国名著
SAT阅读高分技巧之句型
SAT阅读中的四大题型说明
巧用“略读”搞定SAT阅读长段落
处理SAT填空题要多加留意中心结构词
如何构建SAT阅读思维攻克难题
SAT阅读 怎样抓取文章主题的技巧说明
超级详细的SAT阅读笔记
攻克长篇SAT考试文章的阅读方法
SAT备考资料整理推荐
攻克SAT阅读要突破的四个关卡
SAT阅读素材:Machine learning
推荐三个好的的SAT阅读考试方法
SAT阅读"读不懂"的原因是什么
SAT阅读 应该怎样备考
SAT阅读:填鸭式备考时大忌
4道SAT阅读句子练习题
SAT阅读破解生词的方法
SAT小说类文章的阅读技巧
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |