8. Based upon a survey among workers that indicates a high level of interest in the
topics of corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, the author
concludes that workers are not apathetic about management issues. Specifically, it is
argued that since 79 percent of the 1200 workers who responded to survey expressed
interest in these topics, the notion that workers are apathetic about management issues is
incorrect. The reasoning in this argument is problematic in several respects.
First, the statistics cited in the editorial may be misleading because the total
number of workers employed by the corporation is not specified. For example, if the
corporation employs 2000 workers, the fact that 79 percent of the nearly 1200
respondents showed interest in these topics provides strong support for the conclusion.
On the other hand, if the corporation employs 200,000 workers, the conclusion is much
weaker.
Another problem with the argument is that the respondents views are not
necessarily representative of the views of the work force in general. For example,
because the survey has to do with apathy, it makes sense that only less apathetic workers
would respond to it, thereby distorting the overall picture of apathy among the work
force. Without knowing how the survey was conducted, it is impossible to assess
whether or not this is the case.
A third problem with the argument is that it makes a hasty generalization about
the types of issues workers are interested in. It accords with common sense that workers
would be interested in corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, since
these issues affect workers very directly. However, it is unfair to assume that workers
would be similarly interested in other management issues ones that do not affect them or
affect them less directly.
In conclusion, this argument is not convincing as it stands. To strengthen it, the
author would have to show that the respondents account for a significant and
representative portion of all workers. Additionally, the author must provide evidence of
workers interest other management topics not just those that affect workers directly.
试论雅思阅读平行阅读法的局限性
剑桥雅思6阅读全面分析
雅思阅读背景资料:笔译口译
TRUE、 FALSE 、NOT GIVEN的内在涵义及判断方法
在澳洲遭抢劫
雅思A类阅读判断题标准探讨(一)
雅思阅读中的相关信号词
如何读懂雅思文章(一)
雅思阅读提升策略
谈雅思阅读考试应该如何准备
段落信息配对题解法初探
雅思阅读基本技巧谈
攻克雅思考试学术类阅读的五大心法
雅思阅读战报
《雅思阅读真经2》勘误与答疑(上)
5月雅思阅读题型走势分析
张楠:分析1月26日雅思阅读考试形势
全年阅读考试盘点
刘洪波谈留学:澳大利亚和英国留学费用比较
雅思阅读部分答案
Harvey的阅读回忆:眼镜蛇毒
雅思阅读捷径-剑桥真题中同义替换词和考点
雅思样题—Academic Reading
《雅思阅读真经2》勘误与答疑(下)
《雅思阅读真经》问题解答
雅思名师刘洪波谈雅思词汇学习(下)
乐宁名师白冰谈阅读--如何背阅读单词
雅思阅读考试战况分析
Harvey的阅读回忆:Rhythms of Nature
浅谈提高雅思阅读能力
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |