36. This newsletter article claims that Professor Taylors foreign-language program at
Jones University is a model of foreign language instruction. This conclusion is based on
a study in which foreign language tests were given to students at 25 other universities.
The study shows that first-year language students at Jones speak more fluently after just
10 to 20 weeks in the program than do 90 percent of foreign-language majors at other
colleges at graduation. Despite these impressive statistics, I am unconvinced by this
argument for two reasons.
To begin with, the assumption here is that students from Professor Taylors
program have learned more than foreign language students at other universities.
However, we are not given enough information about the study to be sure that this
comparison is reliable. For example, the article does not tell us whether the foreign
language students at Jones were given the tests; it only reports that the tests in question
were given to students at 25 other colleges. If Jones students were not tested, then no
basis exists for comparing them to students at the other universities. In addition, the
article does not indicate whether students at all the universities, including Jones, were
given the same tests. If not, then again no basis exists for the comparison.
Furthermore, we cannot tell from this article whether the universities in the study,
or their students, are comparable in other ways. For instance, Jones might be a
prestigious university that draws its students from the top echelon of high school
graduates, while the other universities are lower-ranked schools with more lenient
admission requirements. In this event, the study wouldnt tell us much about Professor
Taylors program, for the proficiency of his students might be a function of their
superior talent and intelligence.
In conclusion, the statistics cited in the article offer little support for the claim
about Taylors program. To strengthen the argument, the author must show that the
universities in the study, including Jones, were comparable in other ways, that their
foreign language students were tested identically, and that Taylors program was the
only important difference between students tested at Jones and those tested at the other
2016秋苏教译林版三年级上册Unit 4《My family》word教案1
2016秋苏教译林版英语四年级上册Unit 1《1 I like dogs》(第一课时)word教案
2016秋苏教译林版英语四年级上册Unit 5《Our new home》(第二课时)word教案
2016秋苏教译林版三年级上册Unit 6《Colours》word教案
2016秋苏教译林版英语四年级上册Unit 5《Our new home》(第四课时)word教案
2016秋苏教译林版英语四年级上册Unit 5《Our new home》(第一课时)word教案
苏教牛津版英语四下《Unit6 period1》教学设计
苏教牛津版英语四下《Unit8 period1》教学设计
2016秋苏教译林版英语四年级上册Unit 1《1 I like dogs》(第二课时)word教案
2014秋江苏译林版六上《Unit 2 What a day》word五课时教案
2016秋苏教译林版英语四年级上册Unit 2《Let’s make a salad》(第三课时)word教案
2016秋苏教译林版三年级上册Unit 8《Happy New Year》word教案
2016秋苏教译林版三年级上册Unit 7《Would you like a pie》word教案
2014秋江苏译林版六上《Unit 6 Keep our city clean》word第一课时教案
2016秋苏教译林版英语四年级上册Unit 4《I can play basketball》(第二课时)word教案
2016秋苏教译林版英语四年级上册Unit 3《How many》(第三课时)word教案
2014秋江苏译林版六上《Unit 2 What a day》word教案
2014秋江苏译林版小学英语五年级上册教学计划
2016秋苏教译林版英语四年级上册Unit 4《I can play basketball》(第三课时)word教案
2014秋江苏译林版六上《Unit 6 Keep our city clean》word第二课时教案
苏教牛津版英语四下《Unit9》教学设计
2014秋江苏译林版五上《Unit 8 At Christmas》word教案
2016秋苏教译林版英语四年级上册Unit 6《At the snack bar》(第三课时)word教案
2016秋苏教译林版英语四年级上册Unit 1《1 I like dogs》(第四课时)word教案
苏教牛津版英语四下《Unit7》教学设计
苏教牛津版英语四下《Unit6》教学设计
2014秋江苏译林版六上《Unit 1 The king’s new cloths》word教案教案
2016秋苏教译林版英语四年级上册Unit 4《I can play basketball》(第四课时)word教案
2016秋苏教译林版英语四年级上册Unit 1《1 I like dogs》(第三课时)word教案
2016秋苏教译林版英语四年级上册Unit 5《Our new home》(第三课时)word教案
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |