GMAT考试写作指导：Argument范文二四

　　84. The vice president of Nostrum argues that implementing an increase in health and

　　retirement benefits for employees is not a good idea at this time. His main line of

　　reasoning s that an increase in benefits is both financially unjustified and unnecessary―

　　financially unjustified because last years profits were lower than the preceding years,

　　and unnecessary because Nostrums chief competitor offers lower benefits to its

　　employees and because a recent Nostrum employee survey indicates that two-thirds of

　　the respondents viewed the current benefits package favorably While the argument has

　　some merit, it is not completely convincing.

　　Admittedly the vice presidents reasoning linking employee benefits with

　　company profits seems reasonable on its face. Companies that are not profitable are ill-

　　advised to take on additional costs such as increased employee benefits. However, the

　　fact that Nostrums profits last year were lower than the preceding year does not imply

　　that Nostrum is experiencing financial difficulties that preclude it from increasing

　　employee benefits at this time. Perhaps the previous years profits were extremely large;

　　whereas last years profits, albeit lower, were sufficient to fund an increase in the

　　benefits package without threatening the companys bottom line.

　　Also, the fact that Nostrums chief competitor provides lower benefits to its

　　employees is not a good reason for Nostrum to deny an increase to its employees.

　　Employee loyalty is an important asset to any company, and providing good pay and

　　good benefits are among the best ways to acquire it. Nostrum would be well advised to

　　assure that its employees have little reason to seek employment elsewhere, and

　　especially from its chief competitor.

　　Finally, one can infer from the surveys results that a full one-third of the

　　respondents may have viewed the current benefits package unfavorably. If so, such

　　widespread satisfaction would weaken the vice presidents argument. Lacking more

　　specific information about how these other employees responded, it is impossible to

　　assess the reliability of the surveys results or to make an informed recommendation.

　　In conclusion the vice presidents argument against implementing a benefits

　　increase is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument, he must provide evidence that the

　　increase in benefits would have a negative impact on the companys overall profitability.

　　Additionally, he must provide more information about the manner in which the survey

　　was conducted before we can determine the degree of employee satisfaction of the

　　current benefits