The following appeared in the editorial section of a newspaper. As public concern over drug abuse has increased, authorities have become more vigilant in their efforts to prevent illegal drugs from entering the country. Many drug traffickers have consequently switched from marijuana, which is bulky, or heroin, which has a market too small to justify the risk of severe punishment, to cocaine. Thus enforcement efforts have ironically resulted in an observed increase in the illegal use of cocaine. Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
The conclusion in this argument is that increased vigilance by drug enforcement authorities has resulted in an increase in the illegal use of cocaine. The author reaches this conclusion on the grounds that drug traffickers have responded to increased enforcement efforts by switching from bulkier and riskier drugs to cocaine. Presumably, the authors reasoning is that the increased enforcement efforts inadvertently brought about an increase in the supply of cocaine which, in turn, brought about the observed increase in the illegal use of cocaine. This line of reasoning is problematic in two important respects.
In the first place, the author has engaged in after this, therefore because of this reasoning. The only reason offered for believing that the increased vigilance caused the increase in cocaine use is the fact that the former preceded the latter. No additional evidence linking the two events is offered in the argument, thus leaving open the possibility that the two events are not causally related but merely correlated. This in turn leaves open the possibility that factors other than the one cited are responsible for the increase in cocaine use.
In the second place, the author assumes that an increase in the supply of cocaine is sufficient to bring about an increase in its use. While this is a tempting assumption, it is a problematic one. The presumption required to substantiate this view is that drug users are not particular about which drugs they use, so that if marijuana and heroin are not available, they will switch to whatever drug is available―cocaine in this case. The assumption does not seem reasonable on its face. Marijuana, heroin, and cocaine are not alike in their effects on users; nor are they alike in the manner in which they are ingested or in their addictive properties. The view that drug users choice of drugs is simply a function of supply overlooks these important differences.
In conclusion, the author has failed to establish a causal link between increased enforcement efforts and the observed increase in illegal cocaine use. While the enforcement activities may have been a contributing factor, to show a clear causal connection the author must examine and rule out various other factors.
墙
水
新冠疫情导致美国四成低收入劳动者失业
活力四射的初三岁月
谁说不相容?
体坛英语资讯:Hungarian swimming champion Boglarka Kapas tests positive for COVID-19
越来越多种动物被确诊新冠病毒
请天鹅捎去祝福
梦想·坚持·超越
新《白雪公主》
520上新!央行发行心形纪念币
国内英语资讯:Guangdong, Hong Kong, Macao studying mutual recognition of quarantine measures, virus testin
粉笔灰的味道
有人夸我的裙子很美
新研究:男人的肺似乎更易感染新冠病毒
体坛英语资讯:World Athletics postpones three more Diamond League events
让世界充满爱
疲惫和轻巧的脚步
国内英语资讯:China firmly opposes U.S. restrictions on Chinese tech giant Huawei
球台下的脚步
恩情无限,真诚回馈
国内英语资讯:Chinese health official urges targeted, effective measures to avert epidemic rebounds
我是怎样学好地理的
彼岸
国内英语资讯:Chinas top legislature proposes to adjust agenda of standing committee session
国内英语资讯:Palace Museum livestreams Chinese culture to celebrate Intl Museum Day
暖心!世卫组织给武汉中学生手写回信,这中文太工整了!
脚步
体坛英语资讯:Chinese Olympic Committee supports IOC decision on new dates for Tokyo 2020
美国首都华盛顿特区“居家令”延长至6月8日
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |